Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Income Tax Hearing Date cannot be Advanced without Intimating Assessee: Orissa HC sets aside Order rejecting S. 154 Application [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court has held that an income tax authority cannot advance a scheduled hearing date and pass an adverse order without duly informing...
![Revenue Sharing with Diagnostic Labs Not Taxable as BSS: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand on Hospital [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/250x150_2113380-revenue-sharing-diagnostic-labs-not-taxable-bss-cestat-service-tax-demand-hospital-taxscan.webp "Revenue Sharing with Diagnostic Labs Not Taxable as BSS: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand on Hospital [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Quashes Customs duty on Silk Fabric Imports, Rules Non-Return of Seized Laptop Violates Natural Justice and Remits Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/250x150_2113364-customs-duty-silk-fabric-imports-cestat-taxscan.jfif "CESTAT Quashes Customs duty on Silk Fabric Imports, Rules Non-Return of Seized Laptop Violates Natural Justice and Remits Matter [Read Order]")
![Cancellation of GST Registration for Return Default Reversible if Returns Filed and Dues Cleared: Gujarat HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/500x300_2113535-cancellation-of-gst-registration-return-default-reversible-returns-filed-dues-cleared-gujarat-hc-taxscan.webp "Cancellation of GST Registration for Return Default Reversible if Returns Filed and Dues Cleared: Gujarat HC [Read Order]")
![Tripura HC Quashes VAT Penalty Notices Issued 9 Years After Transactions and Post Refund Claim as Violative of Art 14 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113288-tripura-hc-vat-penalty-notices-refund-claim-vat-penalty-vat-notice-taxscan.webp "Tripura HC Quashes VAT Penalty Notices Issued 9 Years After Transactions and Post Refund Claim as Violative of Art 14 [Read Order]")
Income Tax Hearing Date cannot be Advanced without Intimating Assessee: Orissa HC sets aside Order rejecting S. 154 Application [Read Order]
The High Court observed that once a hearing date is fixed, the authority is duty-bound to make sure that any advancement of the date is duly intimated to the assessee.
![SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/750x450_2111025-scn-lacks-precise-bas-classification-cestat-sets-aside-service-tax-demand-against-amway-distributor-taxscan.webp "SCN Lacks Precise BAS Classification: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand against Amway Distributor [Read Order]")
![Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113176-chhattisgarh-hc-scn-writ-jurisdiction-state-beverages-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "Writ Jurisdiction Not Invocable at SCN Stage: Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses State Beverages Corporation’s Plea on Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/06/500x300_2110562-service-tax-demand-trst-3-cestat-taxable-value-before-levy-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand Based only on ITR–ST-3 Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Holds Revenue must Establish Taxable Value before Levy [Read Order]")
![When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2111017-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.jfif "When Dept Admits No Service Tax Liability, It cannot Deny Refund of Deposit made during Investigation on Limitation: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
![Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110695-construction-govt-residential-quarters-gsphcl-taxable-cestat-drops-service-tax-demand-works-contract-upholds-gta-liability.webp "Construction of Govt. Residential Quarters to GSPHCL Not Taxable: CESTAT Drops Service Tax Demand on Works Contract but Upholds GTA Liability [Read Order]")
![Revenue Sharing with Diagnostic Labs Not Taxable as BSS: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand on Hospital [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/20/750x450_2113380-revenue-sharing-diagnostic-labs-not-taxable-bss-cestat-service-tax-demand-hospital-taxscan.webp "Revenue Sharing with Diagnostic Labs Not Taxable as BSS: CESTAT Sets aside Service Tax Demand on Hospital [Read Order]")
![Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/750x450_2112853-cash-withdrawals-show-intent-defraud-under-nclat-nclt-order-against-directors-taxscan.webp "Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]")
Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]
The appellate tribunal found that massive cash withdrawals, undocumented related‑party payments, and non‑cooperation with the Resolution Professional (RP) established a clear pattern of fraudulent conduct.
Kavi Priya
![Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Bangalore-Service-Tax-liquidated-damages-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on liquidated damages collected from supplier on account of non-performance of the contracts: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Yogitha S. Yogesh
Rupesh Sharma
Saagarika Gopinath
Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]
The appellate tribunal found that massive cash withdrawals, undocumented related‑party payments, and non‑cooperation with the Resolution Professional (RP) established a clear pattern of fraudulent conduct.
![Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete Supreme Court Cases [Part VI]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/18/500x300_2113034-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-complete-supreme-court-cases-part-6-taxscan.webp "Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete Supreme Court Cases [Part VI]")
