- Home
- »
- Eeva Mary Sanil

Eeva Mary Sanil
![ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Re-examine Gift from HUF Under Section 56(2)(vii) of Income Tax Act 1961 [Read Order] ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Re-examine Gift from HUF Under Section 56(2)(vii) of Income Tax Act 1961 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-Hindu-Undivided-Family-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg)
ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Re-examine Gift from HUF Under Section 56(2)(vii) of Income Tax Act 1961 [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Surat bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...
Failure to File Copy of Financial Statement u/s 137 of Companies Act: MCA imposes Penalty on Company and Board of Directors
In a recent order of adjudication passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA ), the Registrar of Companies imposed a fine of ₹3.3 lakhs on the company and its board of directors for the...
ITAT Sets Aside ₹4.16 Cr Tax Addition, Citing Misinterpretation of Section 69A and Procedural Lapse [Read Order]
The Raipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the assessment order in the case of Harish Pandey, directing the assessing officer (AO) to conduct a fresh assessment. The...
ITAT Allows Amortization of Surface Rights u/s 35E, Upholds Mining Lease Expenditure as Business Right [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the amortisation of surface rights for mining can be allowed under Section 35E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and that the...
The Burden of Proof on Taxpayer: ITAT dismisses Appeal as Assessee fails to Justify Unexplained Cash Disposits [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the tax addition against an assessee who failed to provide the source of his bank deposits. The tribunal dismissed the appeal after...
ITAT Quashes Penalty for Non-Compliance to Statutory Notices During COVID-19, Citing Reasonable Cause [Read Order]
The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside a penalty proceeding of ₹20,000 levied under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty was imposed for non-compliance...