- Home
- »
- Eeva Mary Sanil

Eeva Mary Sanil
![ITAT Quashes PCITs Order u/s 263 Against Bharti Airtel, Holds Interest and Penalty on License Fee as Revenue Expenditure [Read Order] ITAT Quashes PCITs Order u/s 263 Against Bharti Airtel, Holds Interest and Penalty on License Fee as Revenue Expenditure [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-ruling-PCIT-order-Bharti-Airtel-tax-taxscan.jpg)
ITAT Quashes PCIT's Order u/s 263 Against Bharti Airtel, Holds Interest and Penalty on License Fee as Revenue Expenditure [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of...
Relief to LG Electronics: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Call Centre Services for After-Sales Support [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has held that LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. is entitled to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid for call...
Standard Form for Waiver of SCN and Personal Hearing Not a Substitute for Statutory Obligation: Delhi HC rules Seizure Without SCN Illegal [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court ordered the release of goods detained by customs authorities. The court cited a failure to issue a proper show cause notice as required under Section 124 of...
Failure to Consider Assessee's Delay Condonation Request u/s 249(3): ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) after it erroneously dismissed the...
Export Proceeded after Customs Clearance and Receival of Foreign Remittance: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 114 [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) recently held that a penalty cannot be imposed if there is no customs violation. It observed that the export...
ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271D: Penalty Held Invalid as Section 153C Assessment Quashed due to Lack of Incriminating Material [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside a penalty of ₹3,50,000 imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT) initially...