Franklin Joshva
![Renting of Residential Property to Govt for Backward Class Girl’s Hostel Exempt from GST: AAR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/02/500x300_2072365-renting-residential-property-govt-backward-class-girls-hostel-gst-aar-taxscan.webp "Renting of Residential Property to Govt for Backward Class Girl’s Hostel Exempt from GST: AAR [Read Order]")
Renting of Residential Property to Govt for Backward Class Girl’s Hostel Exempt from GST: AAR [Read Order]
The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that the supply of renting services provided to the Social Justice and Special Assistance...
![Reassessment After 4 Years With Same Set of Facts Which Already Available During Original Assessment Legally Bad: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/250x150_2071302-reassessment-set-of-facts-available-original-assessment-legally-bad-itat-taxscan.webp "Reassessment After 4 Years With Same Set of Facts Which Already Available During Original Assessment Legally Bad: ITAT [Read Order]")
![BroadBand and Bandwidth Charges Not a Royalty: ITAT Dismisses TDS claim of Revenue [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/250x150_2071310-budget-2024-union-budget-2024-budget-updates-budget-news-industry-demands-in-budget-industry-suggestions-for-tds-troublesome-tds-claim-tds-credit-taxscan.webp "BroadBand and Bandwidth Charges Not a Royalty: ITAT Dismisses TDS claim of Revenue [Read Order]")
Addition For Extrapolated Wages Restricted to Date of Survey Due to Lack of Evidence: ITAT Deletes ₹1.02 Cr Addition [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has deleted an addition of Rs. 1,02,10,256/- for extrapolated wages and salary payments and held that such extrapolation beyond ...
![Addition For Extrapolated Wages Restricted to Date of Survey Due to Lack of Evidence: ITAT Deletes ₹1.02 Cr Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/500x300_2071430-lack-of-evidence-taxscan.webp "Addition For Extrapolated Wages Restricted to Date of Survey Due to Lack of Evidence: ITAT Deletes ₹1.02 Cr Addition [Read Order]")
Form 10 ID must be Filed within Due Date Specified u/s 139(1) for availing Concessional Rate u/s 115BAB : ITAT [Read Order]
The Raipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that Form 10ID must be filed within the due date specified under Section 139(1) for availing for the concessional tax rate under...
![Form 10 ID must be Filed within Due Date Specified u/s 139(1) for availing Concessional Rate u/s 115BAB : ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/500x300_2071446-itat-itat-ahmedabad-itat-restores-matter-to-ao-taxscan.webp "Form 10 ID must be Filed within Due Date Specified u/s 139(1) for availing Concessional Rate u/s 115BAB : ITAT [Read Order]")
Retired Partner Liable for Firm's GST Dues if No Timely Intimation about Date of Retirement to Commissioner: Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses Writ [Read Order]
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a writ petition and upheld the liability of a retired partner for GST dues of the firm M/s Foreigners Auto Zone due to failure in providing timely ...
![Retired Partner Liable for Firms GST Dues if No Timely Intimation about Date of Retirement to Commissioner: Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses Writ [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/500x300_2071494-retired-partner-gst-taxscan.webp "Retired Partner Liable for Firms GST Dues if No Timely Intimation about Date of Retirement to Commissioner: Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses Writ [Read Order]")
Unexplained Credit Addition u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Citing Retraction of Statements and Documentary Evidence [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 6,93,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and ruled that the loan transaction...
![Unexplained Credit Addition u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Citing Retraction of Statements and Documentary Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/500x300_2071634-unexplained-credit-unexplained-credit-addition-section-68-of-the-income-tax-act-taxscan.webp "Unexplained Credit Addition u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Citing Retraction of Statements and Documentary Evidence [Read Order]")
Foreign Exchange Loss Allowed as Revenue Expenditure: ITAT Deletes Disallowance Citing Non-Capitalization [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the disallowance of foreign exchange loss amounting to Rs. 1,12,449 and ruled that such loss arising from revenue transactions...
![Foreign Exchange Loss Allowed as Revenue Expenditure: ITAT Deletes Disallowance Citing Non-Capitalization [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070957-foreign-exchange-loss-revenue-expenditure-itat-deletes-disallowance-citing-non-capitalization-taxscan.webp "Foreign Exchange Loss Allowed as Revenue Expenditure: ITAT Deletes Disallowance Citing Non-Capitalization [Read Order]")
Section 14A Disallowance Restricted to Exempt Income Investments: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Rejects Retrospective Amendment Application [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that disallowance should be restricted to investments that actually yielded exempt income, rejecting the Revenue’s contention for ...
![Section 14A Disallowance Restricted to Exempt Income Investments: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Rejects Retrospective Amendment Application [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070951-itat-mumbai-section-14a-disallowance-income-investments-taxscan.webp "Section 14A Disallowance Restricted to Exempt Income Investments: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Rejects Retrospective Amendment Application [Read Order]")
Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to 12.5% Gross Profit: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Citing Judicial Precedent [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] order restricting bogus purchase addition to 12.5% of gross profit and dismissed...
![Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to 12.5% Gross Profit: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Citing Judicial Precedent [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070917-bogus-purchase-addition-taxscan.webp "Bogus Purchase Addition Restricted to 12.5% Gross Profit: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Order, Citing Judicial Precedent [Read Order]")