Franklin Joshva
![Dept Denies CENVAT Credit u/r 4 of CCR: CESTAT Confirms Eligibility Citing Complete Details Available in Bills/Invoices u/r 9(2) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Kolkata-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CENVAT-Credit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Dept Denies CENVAT Credit u/r 4 of CCR: CESTAT Confirms Eligibility Citing Complete Details Available in Bills/Invoices u/r 9(2) [Read Order]")
Dept Denies CENVAT Credit u/r 4 of CCR: CESTAT Confirms Eligibility Citing Complete Details Available in Bills/Invoices u/r 9(2) [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) confirmed the appellant's eligibility for CENVAT Credit stating...
![AO adds Rs. 24 lakhs u/s 69A Income Tax Act: ITAT confirms Agriculture Income, reduces addition to Rs. 2 lakhs to prevent Revenue Loss [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-Surat-Income-Tax-Act-Agriculture-Income-taxscan.jpg "AO adds Rs. 24 lakhs u/s 69A Income Tax Act: ITAT confirms Agriculture Income, reduces addition to Rs. 2 lakhs to prevent Revenue Loss [Read Order]")
![Exchange Gain can be Adjusted from Total Income by Reducing it from Block of Assets u/s 43A and ICDS: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-Section-43A-of-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Exchange Gain can be Adjusted from Total Income by Reducing it from Block of Assets u/s 43A and ICDS: ITAT [Read Order]")
![CIT(A) cannot Direct Reopening u/s 150(1) if Time Limit beyond 6 years u/s 150(2) has Expired: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CIT-Time-Limit-CITA-cannot-Direct-Reopening-taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) cannot Direct Reopening u/s 150(1) if Time Limit beyond 6 years u/s 150(2) has Expired: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT confirms Rs. 35.83 Lakh LTCG Addition, rejects Sauda Chitthi Claim for Enhanced Acquisition Cost due to Absence in Previous Financial Records [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Long-Term-Capital-Gain-LTCG-addition-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "ITAT confirms Rs. 35.83 Lakh LTCG Addition, rejects Sauda Chitthi Claim for Enhanced Acquisition Cost due to Absence in Previous Financial Records [Read Order]")
PCIT revises to disallow Expenditure u/s 14A: ITAT clarifies S.14A Non-Obstante Clause applies prospectively from 01.04.2022 [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was a Non-Obstante clause that can be applied prospectively from 01.04.2022 and quashed...
![PCIT revises to disallow Expenditure u/s 14A: ITAT clarifies S.14A Non-Obstante Clause applies prospectively from 01.04.2022 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-PCIT-Disallow-Expenditure-Disallow-Expenditure-Section-14A-Section-14A-PCIT-Revises-Non-Obstante-Clause-taxscan.jpg "PCIT revises to disallow Expenditure u/s 14A: ITAT clarifies S.14A Non-Obstante Clause applies prospectively from 01.04.2022 [Read Order]")
AO added Rs.89,49,138 u/s 69A as unexplained money, Taxpayer submitted paper book explaining each entries: ITAT Remands Matter for Reconsideration [Read Order]
The Ranchi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the addition of Rs. 89,49,138 under section 69A of the Income Tax Act matter back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...
![AO added Rs.89,49,138 u/s 69A as unexplained money, Taxpayer submitted paper book explaining each entries: ITAT Remands Matter for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-Section-69A-unexplained-money-Taxpayer-submitted-paper-book-ITAT-Remands-Matter-Assessing-Officer-AO-taxscan.jpg "AO added Rs.89,49,138 u/s 69A as unexplained money, Taxpayer submitted paper book explaining each entries: ITAT Remands Matter for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
Non-Compliance Due to Notice for Seven AYs Issued in Short Period: ITAT Deletes 6 Penalties, Upholds Only One [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted penalties levied on seven assessment years due to non-compliance citing all notices served in a short period and upheld only one...
![Non-Compliance Due to Notice for Seven AYs Issued in Short Period: ITAT Deletes 6 Penalties, Upholds Only One [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Non-Compliance-6-Penalties-Seven-AYs-ITAT-Deletes-ITAT-Surat-year-penalty-Short-Period-taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance Due to Notice for Seven AYs Issued in Short Period: ITAT Deletes 6 Penalties, Upholds Only One [Read Order]")
CIT(A) Fails to consider written submission and issued notice via email despite opted No in Form 35: ITAT Quashes Ex Parte order [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the Ex-parte order citing the Commissioner of Income Tax [appeal] [CIT(A)] failed to consider the written submission of the...
![CIT(A) Fails to consider written submission and issued notice via email despite opted No in Form 35: ITAT Quashes Ex Parte order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-CITA-issued-notice-via-email-despite-ITAT-Quashes-ITAT-Quashes-Ex-Parte-order-taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) Fails to consider written submission and issued notice via email despite opted No in Form 35: ITAT Quashes Ex Parte order [Read Order]")
AO Adds Rs. 2.37 Crore u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) for Valuation Discrepancy in Agricultural Land Purchase: ITAT directs to obtain DVO report [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to obtain the District Valuation Officer (DVO) report, as the AO added Rs. 2.37 under section...
![AO Adds Rs. 2.37 Crore u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) for Valuation Discrepancy in Agricultural Land Purchase: ITAT directs to obtain DVO report [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/agricultural-land-valuation.jpg "AO Adds Rs. 2.37 Crore u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) for Valuation Discrepancy in Agricultural Land Purchase: ITAT directs to obtain DVO report [Read Order]")
Cash Deposits from Business Income during Demonetization cannot be treated as Unexplained Entirely: ITAT upholds 20% of Additions due to Unknown Source
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that the cash deposits made during demonetization out of business income cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits completely....
Non-compliance due to notice issue only via email: ITAT Remands Cash deposits during Demonetization Matter [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the matter concerning cash deposits made by the assessee during demonetization for fresh assessment considering the notice was...
![Non-compliance due to notice issue only via email: ITAT Remands Cash deposits during Demonetization Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/cash-deposit.jpeg "Non-compliance due to notice issue only via email: ITAT Remands Cash deposits during Demonetization Matter [Read Order]")