Franklin Joshva
![Procedural delay in filing form 67 cannot override objectives of DTAA: ITAT directs to grant FTC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Delay-in-Filing-form-67-Foreign-tax-credit-taxscan.jpeg "Procedural delay in filing form 67 cannot override objectives of DTAA: ITAT directs to grant FTC [Read Order]")
Procedural delay in filing form 67 cannot override objectives of DTAA: ITAT directs to grant FTC [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that procedural delay of filing form 67Â cannot override the objectives of DTAA...
![Contributions to approved Superannuation Fund deductible u/s 36(1)(iv) of Income Tax if within Prescribed Limits: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Contributions to approved Superannuation Fund deductible u/s 36(1)(iv) of Income Tax if within Prescribed Limits: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Only Exempt Income-Yielding Investments to be Considered for S.14A disallowance: ITAT directs for recalculation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-section-14A-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-income-yielding-investments-taxscan.jpg "Only Exempt Income-Yielding Investments to be Considered for S.14A disallowance: ITAT directs for recalculation [Read Order]")
![Disallowance of TDS Credit on IMP Transfer Due to assessed in wrong AY: ITAT directs to give Credit in Relevant AY [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-IMP-Transfer-Due-TDS-credit-Taxscan.jpg "Disallowance of TDS Credit on IMP Transfer Due to assessed in wrong AY: ITAT directs to give Credit in Relevant AY [Read Order]")
![ITAT Reduces Gross Margin on Unaccounted Cash Receipts to 6% from 12% Set by CIT(A) Considering Totality of Facts [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Gross-Margin-ITAT-Reduces-Gross-Margin-Unaccounted-Cash-Cash-Receipts-to-6-from-12-Totality-of-Facts-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Reduces Gross Margin on Unaccounted Cash Receipts to 6% from 12% Set by CIT(A) Considering Totality of Facts [Read Order]")
ITAT upholds AO's Disallowance of STCL Due to Adjustment already made in Previous AY but Deletes Penalty Citing Lack of Justification [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the disallowance of short-term capital loss which was already adjusted in the previous assessment year (AY) but deleted the penalty...
![ITAT upholds AOs Disallowance of STCL Due to Adjustment already made in Previous AY but Deletes Penalty Citing Lack of Justification [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Upholds-STCL-AOs-Disallowance-STCL-Due-to-Adjustment-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-previous-assessment-year-Commissioner-of-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds AOs Disallowance of STCL Due to Adjustment already made in Previous AY but Deletes Penalty Citing Lack of Justification [Read Order]")
AO fails to convert Limited Scrutiny to Complete, Any Addition made outside prescribed scope is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that the Assessing Officer ( AO ) cannot examine any other issue in Limited scrutiny except for which it was notified and any...
![AO fails to convert Limited Scrutiny to Complete, Any Addition made outside prescribed scope is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Invalid-additions-outside-scrutiny-scope-taxscan.jpg "AO fails to convert Limited Scrutiny to Complete, Any Addition made outside prescribed scope is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Delay in Filing of Form 67 not ground to Deny Relief u/s 90 of Income Tax: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Delay-filing-of-form-67-deny-Relief-Income-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Delay in Filing of Form 67 not ground to Deny Relief u/s 90 of Income Tax: ITAT [Read Order]")
Non-Payment of Advance Tax Not Ground for Appeal Dismissal: ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded a case involving an addition of Rs. 1,45,39,000 back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] for fresh...
![Non-Payment of Advance Tax Not Ground for Appeal Dismissal: ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Advance-Tax-Non-Payment-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Payment of Advance Tax Not Ground for Appeal Dismissal: ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Genuineness of Business Transaction Affirmed: ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.90 Lakh Addition for Director's Loan [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition of Rs. 4.90 lakh made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and affirmed the genuineness of a business...
![Genuineness of Business Transaction Affirmed: ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.90 Lakh Addition for Directors Loan [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Delhi-ITAT-Unexplained-Cash-Unexplained-Cash-Credits-Taxscan-1.jpg "Genuineness of Business Transaction Affirmed: ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.90 Lakh Addition for Directors Loan [Read Order]")
Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 98 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Citing Taxpayer’s Illiteracy [Read Order]
The Rajkot Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has condoned a 98-day delay in filing an appeal and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication, emphasizing...
![Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 98 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Citing Taxpayer’s Illiteracy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Filing-Appeal-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 98 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Citing Taxpayer’s Illiteracy [Read Order]")
Unregistered Agreement Not Valid for Capital Gains: ITAT Deletes Rs. 30.5 Lakh and Rs. 2.3 Cr Additions for Property Transaction [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions of Rs. 30.5 lakh under Section 56(vii)(b) and Rs. 2.3 crore as short-term capital gains, holding that an...
![Unregistered Agreement Not Valid for Capital Gains: ITAT Deletes Rs. 30.5 Lakh and Rs. 2.3 Cr Additions for Property Transaction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/agreement.jpg "Unregistered Agreement Not Valid for Capital Gains: ITAT Deletes Rs. 30.5 Lakh and Rs. 2.3 Cr Additions for Property Transaction [Read Order]")