Kavi Priya
Content writer at Taxscan with a passion for clear, engaging legal content. I simplify tax and law topics while sharpening my research and communication skills.
![Relief for BPL Ltd: CESTAT Rules Payment Received from JVA as Pure Reimbursement for Business Transfer Delay, Not Manpower Supply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/500x300_2068501-cestat-bpl-ltd-jva-taxscan.webp "Relief for BPL Ltd: CESTAT Rules Payment Received from JVA as Pure Reimbursement for Business Transfer Delay, Not Manpower Supply [Read Order]")
Relief for BPL Ltd: CESTAT Rules Payment Received from JVA as Pure Reimbursement for Business Transfer Delay, Not Manpower Supply [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the payments received by BPL Ltd from its joint...
![Customs Revisional Order Based on Another’s Case Without Assessing Taxpayer’s Defense: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/250x150_2068151-revision-order-taxscan.webp "Customs Revisional Order Based on Another’s Case Without Assessing Taxpayer’s Defense: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]")
![Setback to Indian National Congress: ITAT denies ₹199 Crore Income Tax Exemption Over Late Filing & Cash Donations Breach [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/250x150_2068191-indian-national-congress-taxscan.webp "Setback to Indian National Congress: ITAT denies ₹199 Crore Income Tax Exemption Over Late Filing & Cash Donations Breach [Read Order]")
SEBI Not Required to Issue Separate Demand Notices for Interest Recovery: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court of India ruled that SEBI is not required to issue a separate demand notice to recover interest on unpaid penalties, as the original adjudication order itself serves as a valid...
![SEBI Not Required to Issue Separate Demand Notices for Interest Recovery: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2068132-sebi-sebi-not-required-to-issue-separate-demand-notices-separate-demand-notices-taxscan.webp "SEBI Not Required to Issue Separate Demand Notices for Interest Recovery: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
ED’s Attachment Order u/s 5(1) of PMLA Not Open to Writ Challenge Without Exhausting Remedies Under the Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Kerala High Court held that a provisional attachment order issued by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002,...
![ED’s Attachment Order u/s 5(1) of PMLA Not Open to Writ Challenge Without Exhausting Remedies Under the Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2068003-eds-attachment-order-section-51-of-pmla-eds-attachment-order-taxscan.webp "ED’s Attachment Order u/s 5(1) of PMLA Not Open to Writ Challenge Without Exhausting Remedies Under the Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and related evidence proved the appellant’s active involvement...
![MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067975-mou-proves-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxscan.webp "MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]")
S. 35C(1A) of Central Excise Act Limits Adjournments to Three: CESTAT dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution [Read Order]
M/s Alcons Infratech vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service TaxThe Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that an appeal cannot be...
![S. 35C(1A) of Central Excise Act Limits Adjournments to Three: CESTAT dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067998-central-excise-act-adjournments-cestat-appeal-taxscan.webp "S. 35C(1A) of Central Excise Act Limits Adjournments to Three: CESTAT dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution [Read Order]")
Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under 'Supply of Tangible Goods Service', not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that providing cash vans with drivers to banks falls under the category of “Supply of Tangible Goods...
![Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under Supply of Tangible Goods Service, not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067978-cash-vans-taxscan.webp "Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under Supply of Tangible Goods Service, not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]")