Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![SCN Demanded IGST, But Final Order Imposes CGST & SGST with Penalty: Allahabad HC Finds Order wholly Contrary to Original SCN [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/500x300_2053207-scn-scn-demanded-igst-final-order-imposes-cgst-sgst-cgst-sgst-cgst-sgst-with-penalty-taxscan.webp "SCN Demanded IGST, But Final Order Imposes CGST & SGST with Penalty: Allahabad HC Finds Order wholly Contrary to Original SCN [Read Order]")
SCN Demanded IGST, But Final Order Imposes CGST & SGST with Penalty: Allahabad HC Finds Order wholly Contrary to Original SCN [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court stayed the operation of a final GST adjudication order that imposed Central and State GST (CGST and SGST) demands along with...
![[TAXSCAN 360] Income Tax Rectification: Time Limits and Grounds for Seeking Rectification u/s 154](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/250x150_2053181-taxscan-360-income-tax-rectification-income-tax-rectification-income-tax-taxscan.webp "[TAXSCAN 360] Income Tax Rectification: Time Limits and Grounds for Seeking Rectification u/s 154")
![RTI Appeal Over GST Appeal Data Dismissed: CIC warns CPIO of GST Appellate Office for Ignoring Hearing Notice [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/250x150_2053172-gst-apeal.webp "RTI Appeal Over GST Appeal Data Dismissed: CIC warns CPIO of GST Appellate Office for Ignoring Hearing Notice [Read Order]")
![15 Lines Extracted from 10-Page GST Reply: Madras HC Criticises Dept for Not Considering Reply Properly or Seeking Additional Documents [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/250x150_2053101-madras-high-court-gst-reply-additional-documents-taxscan.webp "15 Lines Extracted from 10-Page GST Reply: Madras HC Criticises Dept for Not Considering Reply Properly or Seeking Additional Documents [Read Order]")
At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that before passing an ex-parte order, the tax authority must send at least one reminder notice through Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (RPAD) or any other valid...
![At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050643-gst-reminder-gst-reminder-must-be-sent-via-rpad-via-rpad-taxscan.webp "At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Reopening of Assessment Without Complying with S. 143(2) Procedure Is Bad in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050631-procedure-procedure-is-bad-in-law-madras-high-court-taxscan.webp "Reopening of Assessment Without Complying with S. 143(2) Procedure Is Bad in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be granted without reducing the amount allowed under Section 80IB. The first question...
![Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050629-income-tax-deduction-income-tax-deduction-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]")
GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has condoned a 58-day delay in filing a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) appeal, caused by the pendency of a rectification application, and directed the authorities to hear ...
![GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050617-gst-appeal-filing-gst-appeal-pendency-in-rectification-application-taxscan.webp "GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]")
GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand of ₹16.67 crore raised against a tollway company, holding that the proceedings were mechanical and failed to consider the...
![GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050620-madras-hc-gst-demand-mismatch-itc-taxscan.webp "GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")
Capital Gains Exemption u/s 54F Allowable for Purchase of Residential Property Using Sale Proceeds of Land, as Construction Agreement Was Signed Prior to Sale: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that capital gains exemption under Section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is allowable when the assessee invests sale proceeds...
![Capital Gains Exemption u/s 54F Allowable for Purchase of Residential Property Using Sale Proceeds of Land, as Construction Agreement Was Signed Prior to Sale: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050452-exemption-site-img.webp "Capital Gains Exemption u/s 54F Allowable for Purchase of Residential Property Using Sale Proceeds of Land, as Construction Agreement Was Signed Prior to Sale: ITAT [Read Order]")
