Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![Income Tax order passed against Struck off Company despite being Informed: ITAT quashes Notice and Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/500x300_2120894-income-tax-order-passed-against-struck-company-despite-being-informed-itat-quashes-notice-order-taxscan.webp "Income Tax order passed against Struck off Company despite being Informed: ITAT quashes Notice and Order [Read Order]")
Income Tax order passed against Struck off Company despite being Informed: ITAT quashes Notice and Order [Read Order]
The income tax order passed against a struck off company was quashed by the Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ). It was ...
![Invoices, E-Way Bills and Bank Payments Prove Purchases: ITAT deletes 100% Disallowance on alleged Bogus Purchase, Limits to 10% [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/250x150_2120920-itat-delhi-invoices-e-way-bills-bank-payments-taxscan.webp "Invoices, E-Way Bills and Bank Payments Prove Purchases: ITAT deletes 100% Disallowance on alleged Bogus Purchase, Limits to 10% [Read Order]")
![No Separate Rent provided by Co-tenants: ITAT Grants relief to Landlord based on Tenant’s Bank Records [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/250x150_2120903-no-separate-rent-provided-by-co-tenants-taxscan.webp "No Separate Rent provided by Co-tenants: ITAT Grants relief to Landlord based on Tenant’s Bank Records [Read Order]")
Budget 2026: ‘No Sweeping Changes Expected’, Bertelsmann India CFO says awaiting Clearer Income Tax Rules
As the Union Budget 2026 approaches, Bertelsmann India Investments CFO Jayesh Bavle said he does not expect major changes in the taxation, and added that clearer rules will be key for the effective...
No “Comparative ITC Benefit” available when project Commenced wholly in Post-GST Period, S. 171 Not Triggered: GSTAT [Read Order]
‘Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 applies only in cases involving reduction in tax rate or increase in ITC, particularly in projects spanning pre-GST and post- GST periods’ ruled the GST Appellate...
![No “Comparative ITC Benefit” available when project Commenced wholly in Post-GST Period, S. 171 Not Triggered: GSTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/500x300_2120879-comparative-itc-benefit-available-project-commenced-wholly-post-gst-period-s-171-triggered-gstat-taxscan.webp "No “Comparative ITC Benefit” available when project Commenced wholly in Post-GST Period, S. 171 Not Triggered: GSTAT [Read Order]")
Rebate u/s 87A allowable to STCG and LTCG Taxed under New Regime, Not Applicable on VDA Transfers: ITAT [Read Order]
The Indore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that rebate under Section 87A is allowable against tax payable on Short-Term Capital Gains ( STCG ) under Section 111A and...
![Rebate u/s 87A allowable to STCG and LTCG Taxed under New Regime, Not Applicable on VDA Transfers: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/20/500x300_2120862-stcg-and-ltcg-itat-taxscan.jfif "Rebate u/s 87A allowable to STCG and LTCG Taxed under New Regime, Not Applicable on VDA Transfers: ITAT [Read Order]")
Whatsapp Chat confirms Counsel’s Negligence Caused Delay in Filing Income tax Appeal: ITAT Restores matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Indore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that delay in filing income tax appeal was due to the negligence of the counsel. The tribunal accepted the proof of whatsapp chat...
![Whatsapp Chat confirms Counsel’s Negligence Caused Delay in Filing Income tax Appeal: ITAT Restores matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/500x300_2120797-whatsapp-chat-confirms-counsels-negligence-caused-delay-filing-income-tax-appeal-taxscan.webp "Whatsapp Chat confirms Counsel’s Negligence Caused Delay in Filing Income tax Appeal: ITAT Restores matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Deeming Provision of S. 69A applies only when ‘Money Found’ with Taxpayer and Not Explained: ITAT [Read Order]
The deeming provision under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 applies only when “money” is found with the assessee and the assessee fails to explain its nature and source, ruled the Income...
![Deeming Provision of S. 69A applies only when ‘Money Found’ with Taxpayer and Not Explained: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/500x300_2120788-section-69a-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Deeming Provision of S. 69A applies only when ‘Money Found’ with Taxpayer and Not Explained: ITAT [Read Order]")
ESOP Cost allowable as Business Expenditure u/s 37: ITAT allows Yatra’s ₹93L Claim Despite same Issue Pending before SC [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Delhi Bench allowed that ESOP (Employee Stock Option Plan) expenditure to Yatra as business deduction under Section37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...
![ESOP Cost allowable as Business Expenditure u/s 37: ITAT allows Yatra’s ₹93L Claim Despite same Issue Pending before SC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/500x300_2120774-esop-itat-taxscan.jfif "ESOP Cost allowable as Business Expenditure u/s 37: ITAT allows Yatra’s ₹93L Claim Despite same Issue Pending before SC [Read Order]")
No Capital Gain Tax in JDA Execution Year without Consideration & with Limited Possession: ITAT [Read Order]
‘Where no consideration is received and possession is handed over only for limited purpose of development, no capital gains can be said to have accrued in the year of execution of the JDA’, held the...
![No Capital Gain Tax in JDA Execution Year without Consideration & with Limited Possession: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/500x300_2120761-no-capital-gain-tax-jda-execution-year-without-consideration-taxscan.webp "No Capital Gain Tax in JDA Execution Year without Consideration & with Limited Possession: ITAT [Read Order]")