Saagarika Gopinath
Final year BBA LLB( Hons) law student at Government Law College
![Time-Barred Proceedings: CESTAT holds Service Tax Penalty ‘Unjustified’ for being without Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ESTAT-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Penalty-Time-barred-service-tax-proceedings-service-tax-proceedings-taxscan.jpg "Time-Barred Proceedings: CESTAT holds Service Tax Penalty ‘Unjustified’ for being without Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
Time-Barred Proceedings: CESTAT holds Service Tax Penalty ‘Unjustified’ for being without Jurisdiction [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that the service tax penalty was unjustified and without jurisdiction...
![Absence of Cross Examination to Prove Clandestine Removal: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Excise-Duty-Demand-Cross-Examination-Clandestine-Removal-taxscan.jpg "Absence of Cross Examination to Prove Clandestine Removal: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]")
![ITAT upholds Reopening of Income Tax Assessment: grants partial relief w.r.t. unexplained cash deposits [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Assessment-Income-Tax-Assessment-Reopening-unexplained-cash-deposits-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds Reopening of Income Tax Assessment: grants partial relief w.r.t. unexplained cash deposits [Read Order]")
![No Withholding of GST Registration Cancellation for Assessing Petitioners Liability: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Delhi-High-Court-GST-Registration-GST-GST-Registration-Cancellation-Delhi-HC-Taxscan.jpg "No Withholding of GST Registration Cancellation for Assessing Petitioners Liability: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Delhi HC dismisses Petition Challenging Bail in Rs.200 Crore fake GST invoice Case: Statutory Bail u/s 167 Recognized as Constitutional Right [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner of Central Tax, GST Delhi (West) dismissed a petition challenging bail in a Rs. 200 crore fake GST invoice case. In this case,...
![Delhi HC dismisses Petition Challenging Bail in Rs.200 Crore fake GST invoice Case: Statutory Bail u/s 167 Recognized as Constitutional Right [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GST-Goods-and-Service-Tax-GST-Delhi-Fake-GST-invoice-case-bail-TAXSCAN.jpg "Delhi HC dismisses Petition Challenging Bail in Rs.200 Crore fake GST invoice Case: Statutory Bail u/s 167 Recognized as Constitutional Right [Read Order]")
No Service Tax on Joint Venture Movie Screening Agreements: CESTAT quashes Demand and Penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee and held that the demand and penalty in the impugned...
![No Service Tax on Joint Venture Movie Screening Agreements: CESTAT quashes Demand and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CESTAT-Mumbai-Service-Tax-Joint-Venture-Joint-Venture-Movie-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Service Tax on Joint Venture Movie Screening Agreements: CESTAT quashes Demand and Penalty [Read Order]")
Relief to Jio: CESTAT rules no basis for Recovery of Interest or Penalty under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CCR [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. In this case, the...
![Relief to Jio: CESTAT rules no basis for Recovery of Interest or Penalty under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CCR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CESTAT-ruling-on-Jio-Penalty-Under-Rule-6-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Jio: CESTAT rules no basis for Recovery of Interest or Penalty under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CCR [Read Order]")
No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the impugned order and the appellants’ Customs Broker license was restored. In this...
![No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CBLR-regulations-CBLR-Taxscan.jpg "No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]")