Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA. LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Constitutional Law. She is working as a content writer who is passionate in Content creation. Her area of interest are Constitutional law and Co-operate Law. She is also into teaching, baking, reading and gardening.
![Mere Typographical error in demand notice would not invalidate recovery proceedings Initiated by Union Bank of India: DRT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/05/500x300_2059368-union-bank-india-taxscan.webp "Mere Typographical error in demand notice would not invalidate recovery proceedings Initiated by Union Bank of India: DRT [Read Order]")
Mere Typographical error in demand notice would not invalidate recovery proceedings Initiated by Union Bank of India: DRT [Read Order]
The Lucknow bench of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) has held that mere typographical error in demand notice would not invalidate recovery ...
![30 days Delay in filing appeal under NCLT rules can be condoned on sufficient cause : NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/05/250x150_2059363-image.webp "30 days Delay in filing appeal under NCLT rules can be condoned on sufficient cause : NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty on Co noticee is invalid when main case is settled under SVLDRS: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/250x150_2059100-cestat-cestat-ahmedabad-under-svldrs-svldrs-penalty-on-co-noticee-co-noticee-noticee-case-main-noticee-case-customs-taxscan.webp "Penalty on Co noticee is invalid when main case is settled under SVLDRS: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Dispute Over Ownership of Property during Liquidation Process under Company Law: Madras HC directs Official Liquidator to value building through ITCOT within 60 days [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/250x150_2059029-property-dispute-liquidation.webp "Dispute Over Ownership of Property during Liquidation Process under Company Law: Madras HC directs Official Liquidator to value building through ITCOT within 60 days [Read Order]")
Absence of Express Reference for Conveyance in Confiscation Order does not Exclude It from Confiscation u/s130 CSGT Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court, in its recent ruling, held that the absence of an express reference to the conveyance in the confiscation order does not exclude it from confiscation under section 130 of the...
![Absence of Express Reference for Conveyance in Confiscation Order does not Exclude It from Confiscation u/s130 CSGT Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2058923-confiscation-cgst-taxscan.webp "Absence of Express Reference for Conveyance in Confiscation Order does not Exclude It from Confiscation u/s130 CSGT Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Declaration of Value of Goods Cannot be Treated as Suppression Merely Being Incorrect: CESTAT quashes Penalty under Customs Act [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that the declaration of the value of goods was a bonafide declaration and merely because it is...
![Declaration of Value of Goods Cannot be Treated as Suppression Merely Being Incorrect: CESTAT quashes Penalty under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2058909-2041840-penalty-us-2711c-estimated-itat-penalty-absence-concealment-taxscan-1.webp "Declaration of Value of Goods Cannot be Treated as Suppression Merely Being Incorrect: CESTAT quashes Penalty under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Demand of Service Tax cannot be Solely based on Income Tax Data in Form 26AS: CESTAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]
In a recent case, the New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that the service tax demand cannot be based solely on Income Tax Data in Form 26AS...
![Demand of Service Tax cannot be Solely based on Income Tax Data in Form 26AS: CESTAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2058908-income-tax-update-form-26as-taxscan.webp "Demand of Service Tax cannot be Solely based on Income Tax Data in Form 26AS: CESTAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]")
![Kerala HC Upholds validity of SCN Served on Adult Member of Noticee u/s 153 of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2058904-notice-customs-taxscan.webp "Kerala HC Upholds validity of SCN Served on Adult Member of Noticee u/s 153 of Customs Act [Read Order]")
Industrial gases in VITT transported by carrier agency upon issue of Consignment Note qualify as GTA service and not renting and leasing: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Industrial gases in VITT transported by carrier agency upon issue of a consignment note qualify as...
![Industrial gases in VITT transported by carrier agency upon issue of Consignment Note qualify as GTA service and not renting and leasing: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2058898-industrial-gases-1.webp "Industrial gases in VITT transported by carrier agency upon issue of Consignment Note qualify as GTA service and not renting and leasing: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Security services qualify as input service u/r 2(l) of CCR, as service utilized for manufacture of dutiable final products: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that security services qualify as input services under rule 2(l) ofthe Cenvat Credit Rules...
![Security services qualify as input service u/r 2(l) of CCR, as service utilized for manufacture of dutiable final products: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2058878-security.webp "Security services qualify as input service u/r 2(l) of CCR, as service utilized for manufacture of dutiable final products: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Mandatory Personal hearing u/s 28(8) of Customs Act cannot be denied by relying on special provision S.122A: Kerala HC
The Kerala High Court has held that a mandatory hearing opportunity is to be granted under section 28(8) of the Customs Act, 1962 and it cannot be denied by the department by relying on a special...
