Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA. LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Constitutional Law. She is working as a content writer who is passionate in Content creation. Her area of interest are Constitutional law and Co-operate Law. She is also into teaching, baking, reading and gardening.
![No Bar on Corporate Debtor from Contesting Application u/s 9 of IBC even in absence of Demand Notice: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-NCLAT-New-delhi-Corporate-Debtor-Section-9-of-IBC-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Bar on Corporate Debtor from Contesting Application u/s 9 of IBC even in absence of Demand Notice: NCLAT [Read Order]")
No Bar on Corporate Debtor from Contesting Application u/s 9 of IBC even in absence of Demand Notice: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) New Delhi bench has held that the Corporate Debtor cannot be prevented from opposing the...
![Even on the Strength of endorsed bill of entry, CENVAT Credit is admissible: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CENVAT-Credit-1.jpg "Even on the Strength of endorsed bill of entry, CENVAT Credit is admissible: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Averment in Service Tax Appeals as Date on adjudication orders is earlier than Orders dispatch date: CESTAT directs read judication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Appeals-TAXSCAN.jpg "Averment in Service Tax Appeals as Date on adjudication orders is earlier than Orders dispatch date: CESTAT directs read judication [Read Order]")
![Discrpency in Excise Duty Computaion: CESTAT Directs to recompute after Deducting Value of Bought out items, value of clearances to SEZ units etc [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-rulling.jpg "Discrpency in Excise Duty Computaion: CESTAT Directs to recompute after Deducting Value of Bought out items, value of clearances to SEZ units etc [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Allows SSI exemption to Sabari Kitchen Service as per CBEC Circular [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-SSI-exemption-Sabari-Kitchen-Service-Kitchen-Service-CBEC-Circular-CBEC-Sabari-Kitchen-Service-as-per-CBEC-Circular-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Allows SSI exemption to Sabari Kitchen Service as per CBEC Circular [Read Order]")
Possession of Machinery Hypothecated Remains to Corporate Debtor in absence of Lease Deed By Third Party: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi has held that if no lease deed is presented that would allow a third party to claim ownership of the machinery, the corporate debtor will...
![Possession of Machinery Hypothecated Remains to Corporate Debtor in absence of Lease Deed By Third Party: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-NCLAT-Delhi-Corporate-Debtor-Taxscan.jpg "Possession of Machinery Hypothecated Remains to Corporate Debtor in absence of Lease Deed By Third Party: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Delayed Trial & Prolonged Custody of Accused of PMLA Offence: Supreme Court Grants Bail [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court granted bail to the accused of the offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), citing prolonged incarceration and the likelihood of delay in the completion of...
Income Tax Dept or GST dept cannot Retain Cash Seized Prior to Finalisation of Proceedings: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court has held that Income Tax department or GST department cannot retain illegal cash seizied prior to a finalisation of respective proceedings initiated by them. The appellants...
![Income Tax Dept or GST dept cannot Retain Cash Seized Prior to Finalisation of Proceedings: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/GST-I-income-Tax-Dept-Kerala-High-Court-GST-dept-Cash-Seized-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Income Tax Dept or GST dept cannot Retain Cash Seized Prior to Finalisation of Proceedings: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi held that a creditor may be considered a "Secured Creditor" under section 3(30) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by...
![Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/WhatsApp-Image-2025-02-20-at-10.40.51-AM.jpeg "Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) New Delhi has ruled that a financial creditor's ability to seek redress under Section 7 of the law is not in any way restricted by a dispute that...
![Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pending-Arbitration-Prohibit-Financial-Creditors-Financial-Creditors-dispute-even-Pending-Arbitration-avail-remedy-section-7-of-IBC-IBC-taxscan.jpg "Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Failure to maintain record of goods received on subcontracting: CESTAT upholds Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the confiscation under section 111 of the Cutoms Act, 1962 as asseessee failed to maintain record...
![Failure to maintain record of goods received on subcontracting: CESTAT upholds Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Failure-maintain-record-goods-subcontracting-CESTAT-Confiscation-111-of-Customs-Act-taxscan.jpg "Failure to maintain record of goods received on subcontracting: CESTAT upholds Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act [Read Order]")