Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA. LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Constitutional Law. She is working as a content writer who is passionate in Content creation. Her area of interest are Constitutional law and Co-operate Law. She is also into teaching, baking, reading and gardening.
![Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/WhatsApp-Image-2025-02-20-at-10.40.51-AM.jpeg "Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi held that a creditor may be considered a "Secured Creditor" under section 3(30) of...
![Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pending-Arbitration-Prohibit-Financial-Creditors-Financial-Creditors-dispute-even-Pending-Arbitration-avail-remedy-section-7-of-IBC-IBC-taxscan.jpg "Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Failure to maintain record of goods received on subcontracting: CESTAT upholds Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Failure-maintain-record-goods-subcontracting-CESTAT-Confiscation-111-of-Customs-Act-taxscan.jpg "Failure to maintain record of goods received on subcontracting: CESTAT upholds Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act [Read Order]")
![Madras HC Directs to Allow Refund of Wrongly Paid GST under RCM, treating it as supply of service [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Madras-High-Court-RCM-GST-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Directs to Allow Refund of Wrongly Paid GST under RCM, treating it as supply of service [Read Order]")
![Debt of Related Party Cannot Assign to Refrian From Participating in CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-CoC-National-Company-Law-Appellate-Tribunal-Corporate-Debtor-CIRP-Resolution-Professional-Section-21-Taxscan.jpg "Debt of Related Party Cannot Assign to Refrian From Participating in CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Assessment of Two or More Bills of Entry or Shipping Bills Together is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has stated that two or more bills of entry or shipping bills cannot be taken together and assessed. The bench...
![Assessment of Two or More Bills of Entry or Shipping Bills Together is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-Bills-of-Entry-Shipping-Bills-taxscan.jpg "Assessment of Two or More Bills of Entry or Shipping Bills Together is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Cenvat Credit of Service Tax Refund Rejected in GST Regime: Madras HC directs to allow Recredit [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Madras High Court directed to allow recredit Cenvat Credit of service tax refund rejected in In GST regime. The taxpayer couldnot avail the cenvat credit due to the introduction...
![Cenvat Credit of Service Tax Refund Rejected in GST Regime: Madras HC directs to allow Recredit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Cenvat-Credit-Service-Tax-Refund-Rejected-GST-Regime-Madras-HC-taxscan.jpg "Cenvat Credit of Service Tax Refund Rejected in GST Regime: Madras HC directs to allow Recredit [Read Order]")
Procurement of "Holographic Labels" from Govt. for Affixing in Alcoholic Liquor Bottles is Procurement of "Goods": Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the High Court of Madras has held that procurement of "Holographic Labels" from Govt. for affixing in Alcoholic liquor bottles is procurement of "goods”. The court further held...
![Service Tax Demand not valid when Tax and Interest Paid much before Issuing SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/show-cause-notice.jpg "Service Tax Demand not valid when Tax and Interest Paid much before Issuing SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Jurisdiction of PCIT not Invokable in absence of any Incorrectness and Incompleteness in Fact Appreciation by AO: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) Jaipur bench while allowing the appeal has held that the jurisdiction of the Principle Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) is not invokable in absence of any...
![Jurisdiction of PCIT not Invokable in absence of any Incorrectness and Incompleteness in Fact Appreciation by AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-Delhi-ITAT-ITAT-Dismisses-Revenues-Tax-Appeal-Lack-of-Jurisdiction-Appropriate-Bench-Grants-Liberty-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Jurisdiction of PCIT not Invokable in absence of any Incorrectness and Incompleteness in Fact Appreciation by AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
AAR Rules in Favor of Hindustan Zinc: ITC not applicable to Goods or Services received for Increasing Tailing Dam Height [Read Order]
In a ruling in case of Hindustan Zinc, the Rajasthan Authority of Advance Ruling ( AAR ) has held that Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) not applicable on on goods/services received for increasing tailing-dam...
![AAR Rules in Favor of Hindustan Zinc: ITC not applicable to Goods or Services received for Increasing Tailing Dam Height [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Hindustan-Zinc-AAR-case.jpg "AAR Rules in Favor of Hindustan Zinc: ITC not applicable to Goods or Services received for Increasing Tailing Dam Height [Read Order]")