Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA. LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Constitutional Law. She is working as a content writer who is passionate in Content creation. Her area of interest are Constitutional law and Co-operate Law. She is also into teaching, baking, reading and gardening.
![Challenge On Confiscation Order under CGST Act Dismissed on Availability of Statutory Appeal: Kerala HC Allows To Redeem 331.33 g Gold on Payment of Fine [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Kerala-High-Court-CGST-Act-Kerala-HC-Allows-To-Redeem-Gold-Statutory-Appeal-Taxscan.jpg "Challenge On Confiscation Order under CGST Act Dismissed on Availability of Statutory Appeal: Kerala HC Allows To Redeem 331.33 g Gold on Payment of Fine [Read Order]")
Challenge On Confiscation Order under CGST Act Dismissed on Availability of Statutory Appeal: Kerala HC Allows To Redeem 331.33 g Gold on Payment of Fine [Read Order]
The High Court of Kerala allowed to redeem 331.33 gram gold on payment of fine in lieu of Confiscation. The bench found that the challenge on...
![Challenge on GST Applicability over Promotional and Referral Services To Foreign Universities & Colleges: Kerala HC Directs to File Appeal Before GSTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Kerala-high-court-gst-GST-Applicability-GSTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Challenge on GST Applicability over Promotional and Referral Services To Foreign Universities & Colleges: Kerala HC Directs to File Appeal Before GSTAT [Read Order]")
GST Refund Application cannot be Rejected citing Limitation when Deficiences Cured by Subsequent Filing: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court viewed that the rejection of the application for refund filed by the petitioner by communication on the ground that the second application filed by the petitioner was beyond the...
![GST Refund Application cannot be Rejected citing Limitation when Deficiences Cured by Subsequent Filing: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/GST-Refund-Kerala-HC-Kerala-High-Court-Subsequent-Filing-GST-Refund-Application-Refund-Application-taxscan.jpeg "GST Refund Application cannot be Rejected citing Limitation when Deficiences Cured by Subsequent Filing: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Orissa HC Allows Revocation of OGST Registration On Depositing all Taxes, Interest, Late Fee, Penalty [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court allowed the revocation of Orissa Goods and Service Tax ( OGST ) registration on depositing all taxes, interest, late fee, penalty. The delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso...
![Orissa HC Allows Revocation of OGST Registration On Depositing all Taxes, Interest, Late Fee, Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Orissa-High-Court-OGST-Registration-Orissa-Goods-and-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Orissa HC Allows Revocation of OGST Registration On Depositing all Taxes, Interest, Late Fee, Penalty [Read Order]")
Challenge on Validity of S. 16(2)(C) & S. 16(4)Â of CGST Act: Kerala HC Directs to Claim ITC applying Benefit under GST Circular [Read Order]
In a case challenging the validity of section 16(2)(c) and section 16 (4) of the central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST )Act, 2017,the High Court of Kerala directed to claim Input Tax Credit ( ITC )...
![Challenge on Validity of S. 16(2)(C) & S. 16(4)Â of CGST Act: Kerala HC Directs to Claim ITC applying Benefit under GST Circular [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Kerala-HC-CGST-Act-Benefit-under-GST-Circular-Kerala-HC-Directs-to-Claim-ITC-ITC-CGST-taxscan.jpeg "Challenge on Validity of S. 16(2)(C) & S. 16(4)Â of CGST Act: Kerala HC Directs to Claim ITC applying Benefit under GST Circular [Read Order]")
Income Tax Refund Application u/s 119(2)(b) Filed after Nine Years not Condonable: Kerala HCÂ [Read Order]
In a recent judgement, the High Court of Kerala held that income tax refund application under section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed after nine years is not condonable. The Income Tax...
Secured Creditor Is Liable To Pay Liquidator's Fees Under Rule 21A Of IBC Liquidation Regulations: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the fee of the liquidator has to be paid within 90 days from the liquidation commencement date as provided...
Mere Cash Deposit Cannot Be Considered as Income: ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Surat bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that mere cash deposits could not be considered income and deleted the tax addition under section 69 of the Income...
![Mere Cash Deposit Cannot Be Considered as Income: ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-Mere-Cash-Deposit-ITAT-Deletes-Income-Tax-Addition-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Dinesh-Chandra-Dudhwala-Assessing-Officer-ITAT-news-Commissioner-of-Income-tax-NFAC-CIT-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Cash Deposit Cannot Be Considered as Income: ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]")
Petition u/s 7 of IBC Can be Admit on Default Committed Prior To S.10A Period: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has found that date of default has been noted in the NeSL portalon a date which is much prior to Section 10A period and held...
