![Non‑Cooperation with RP and Related‑Party Diversions Prove Intent to Defraud Creditors: NCLAT Upholds S.66 Directions Against Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/500x300_2112868-non-cooperation-rp-related-party-diversions-prove-intent-defraud-creditors-taxscan.webp "Non‑Cooperation with RP and Related‑Party Diversions Prove Intent to Defraud Creditors: NCLAT Upholds S.66 Directions Against Directors [Read Order]")
Non‑Cooperation with RP and Related‑Party Diversions Prove Intent to Defraud Creditors: NCLAT Upholds S.66 Directions Against Directors [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, has upheld an NCLT Kolkata order directing the suspended directors of Dagcon ...
![Benami Attachment Cannot Breach the “Impregnable Firewall” of NCLT‑Approved Resolution Plan: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/250x150_2114211-benami-attachment-cannot-breach-impregnable-firewall-nclt-approved-resolution-plan-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Benami Attachment Cannot Breach the “Impregnable Firewall” of NCLT‑Approved Resolution Plan: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![No Procedural Lapse by Resolution Professional: NCLAT Upholds Order Rejecting Repayment Plans of Guarantors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/250x150_2111276-nclat-chennai-resolution-professional-repayment-plans-guarantors-no-procedural-lapse-order-reject-taxscan.webp "No Procedural Lapse by Resolution Professional: NCLAT Upholds Order Rejecting Repayment Plans of Guarantors [Read Order]")
NCLT alone has Jurisdiction Over Personal Guarantor Insolvency when CIRP Is Pending: Bombay HC orders Transfer of Proceedings
The Bombay High Court held that insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors must be filed before, or transferred to, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) when the corporate debtor is ...
Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, ruled that suspended directors of a corporate debtor cannot demand access to valuation reports rejected by the...
![Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/13/500x300_2111901-suspended-directors-no-right-valuation-reports-rejected-coc-ibc-nclat-taxscan.webp "Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, in a recent case has held that the unexplained Rs 10.54 cr withdrawals demonstrated an intent to defraud creditors, attracting...
![Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/500x300_2112853-cash-withdrawals-show-intent-defraud-under-nclat-nclt-order-against-directors-taxscan.webp "Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]")
Shareholder Has Locus to Challenge Collusive CIRP: NCLAT Holds “Any Person Aggrieved” u/s 61 Must Be Read Widely, Distinguishes Park Energy Case [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, has delivered a detailed and consequential judgment holding that shareholders can be “aggrieved persons” under Section 61 of the...
![Shareholder Has Locus to Challenge Collusive CIRP: NCLAT Holds “Any Person Aggrieved” u/s 61 Must Be Read Widely, Distinguishes Park Energy Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/19/500x300_2113269-shareholder-cirp-nclat-any-person-aggrieved-park-energy-case-taxscan.webp "Shareholder Has Locus to Challenge Collusive CIRP: NCLAT Holds “Any Person Aggrieved” u/s 61 Must Be Read Widely, Distinguishes Park Energy Case [Read Order]")
![No Time Limitation for Section 66(1) Fraudulent Trading Actions: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/500x300_2111091-nclat-fraudulent-trading-no-time-limitation-taxscan.webp "No Time Limitation for Section 66(1) Fraudulent Trading Actions: NCLAT [Read Order]")
NCLAT Sets Aside Private Sale of Corporate Power Ltd, Directs Liquidator to Hold Fresh Swiss Challenge Auction with EMD Capped at 10% of ₹265 Cr Reserve Price
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi, has issued a significant ruling in the liquidation of Corporate Power Limited (CPL), setting aside the earlier...
Authorisation Lapse in Insolvency Petition: NCLAT allows 98 Homebuyers to cure the defect [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi, has permitted 98 homebuyers to cure the authorisation defect in their insolvency petition filed under Section 7 of...
