Major Announcements Expected? FM Addresses Press After 4-Hour GST Council Meeting
The Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitaraman presided over the 53rd meeting of the GST Council today (22nd June 2024) at New Delhi with Revenue...
![Refund Application for Unutilized ITC cannot be rejected due to Non-Registration of GST: Himachal Pradesh HC orders Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court-GST-Refund-application-for-Input-Tax-Credit-Input-Tax-Credit-taxscan.jpg "Refund Application for Unutilized ITC cannot be rejected due to Non-Registration of GST: Himachal Pradesh HC orders Reconsideration [Read Order]")
![Denial of Increased Material / Wage Costs and GST Claim: Patna HC Remands case to BUIDCo’s Chief General Manager [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-Goods-service-tax-Patna-high-court-Patna-hc-remands-case-GST-claim-TAXSCAN.jpg "Denial of Increased Material / Wage Costs and GST Claim: Patna HC Remands case to BUIDCo’s Chief General Manager [Read Order]")
![Hearing Opportunity is Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act for determination of Tax Liability by Revenue Authorities: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-GST-act-Allahabad-High-Court-Tax-Liability-hearing-on-tax-liaility-Revenue-Authorities-taxscan.jpg "Hearing Opportunity is Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act for determination of Tax Liability by Revenue Authorities: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![Retired Employee Faces Inquiry Six Years After Retirement Over Alleged GST Irregularities: Allahabad HC orders Hearing on Merit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-GST-Irregularities-Allahabad-High-Court-Retired-Employee-Inquiry-post-retirement-inquiry-taxscan.jpg "Retired Employee Faces Inquiry Six Years After Retirement Over Alleged GST Irregularities: Allahabad HC orders Hearing on Merit [Read Order]")
Personal Hearing under GST Act Mandatory not only when requested but also for Adverse Orders: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent and significant ruling, the Madras High Court observed that the Personal Hearing under Section 75(4) of GST Act ( Goods and Services Tax ), 2017 is mandatory not only when requested but...
![Personal Hearing under GST Act Mandatory not only when requested but also for Adverse Orders: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-Act-Madras-High-Court-GST-Section-754-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-updates-GST-news-taxscan.jpg "Personal Hearing under GST Act Mandatory not only when requested but also for Adverse Orders: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Quantification of Tax Liability cannot be done u/s 130 of GST Act: Allahabad HC Sets aside Ex Parte Order [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court delivered a significant judgement quashing an ex parte order by the appellate authority stating that the quantification of tax liability cannot be done under Section 130 of...
![Quantification of Tax Liability cannot be done u/s 130 of GST Act: Allahabad HC Sets aside Ex Parte Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/site-img-12.jpg "Quantification of Tax Liability cannot be done u/s 130 of GST Act: Allahabad HC Sets aside Ex Parte Order [Read Order]")
Confiscation of 3.5 kg of Gold Bars Seized u/s 111 of Customs Act: Allahabad HC dismisses Revenue Appeals due to Low Monetary Limit [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court dismissed appeals challenging an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) which had set aside the confiscation of 3.5 kg of gold bars valued...
![Confiscation of 3.5 kg of Gold Bars Seized u/s 111 of Customs Act: Allahabad HC dismisses Revenue Appeals due to Low Monetary Limit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Allahabad-HC-Revenue-Appeals-Gold-Bars-Seized-Confiscation-of-Gold-Bars-Low-Monetary-Limit-taxscan.jpg "Confiscation of 3.5 kg of Gold Bars Seized u/s 111 of Customs Act: Allahabad HC dismisses Revenue Appeals due to Low Monetary Limit [Read Order]")
Voluntary Disclosure does not align with Provisions for Misreporting or Suppression u/s 270A(9) of GST Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that voluntary disclosure misreporting of GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) during scrutiny negated the basis for misreporting under the Section...
![Voluntary Disclosure does not align with Provisions for Misreporting or Suppression u/s 270A(9) of GST Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-rajasthan-high-court-Voluntary-Disclosure-Provisions-for-Misreporting-Suppression-Provisions-taxscan.jpg "Voluntary Disclosure does not align with Provisions for Misreporting or Suppression u/s 270A(9) of GST Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]")
Bombay HC quashes Maharashtra VAT Order passed after Expiry of Four Years from End Relevant Period [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court held that assessment order under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act having been passed after expiry of four years from the end of the year containing period to...
![Bombay HC quashes Maharashtra VAT Order passed after Expiry of Four Years from End Relevant Period [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Bombay-high-court-Maharashtra-VAT-order-VAT-tax-act-assessment-orders-TAXSCAN.jpg "Bombay HC quashes Maharashtra VAT Order passed after Expiry of Four Years from End Relevant Period [Read Order]")
