![Hearing Opportunity is Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act for determination of Tax Liability by Revenue Authorities: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-GST-act-Allahabad-High-Court-Tax-Liability-hearing-on-tax-liaility-Revenue-Authorities-taxscan.jpg "Hearing Opportunity is Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act for determination of Tax Liability by Revenue Authorities: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Hearing Opportunity is Mandatory u/s 75(4) of GST Act for determination of Tax Liability by Revenue Authorities: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court held that an opportunity for hearing is mandatory under Section 75(4) of the Goods and Services Tax...
![Retired Employee Faces Inquiry Six Years After Retirement Over Alleged GST Irregularities: Allahabad HC orders Hearing on Merit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-GST-Irregularities-Allahabad-High-Court-Retired-Employee-Inquiry-post-retirement-inquiry-taxscan.jpg "Retired Employee Faces Inquiry Six Years After Retirement Over Alleged GST Irregularities: Allahabad HC orders Hearing on Merit [Read Order]")
![Personal Hearing under GST Act Mandatory not only when requested but also for Adverse Orders: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-Act-Madras-High-Court-GST-Section-754-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-updates-GST-news-taxscan.jpg "Personal Hearing under GST Act Mandatory not only when requested but also for Adverse Orders: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Quantification of Tax Liability cannot be done u/s 130 of GST Act: Allahabad HC Sets aside Ex Parte Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/site-img-12.jpg "Quantification of Tax Liability cannot be done u/s 130 of GST Act: Allahabad HC Sets aside Ex Parte Order [Read Order]")
Confiscation of 3.5 kg of Gold Bars Seized u/s 111 of Customs Act: Allahabad HC dismisses Revenue Appeals due to Low Monetary Limit [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court dismissed appeals challenging an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) which had set aside the confiscation of 3.5 kg of gold bars valued...
![Confiscation of 3.5 kg of Gold Bars Seized u/s 111 of Customs Act: Allahabad HC dismisses Revenue Appeals due to Low Monetary Limit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Allahabad-HC-Revenue-Appeals-Gold-Bars-Seized-Confiscation-of-Gold-Bars-Low-Monetary-Limit-taxscan.jpg "Confiscation of 3.5 kg of Gold Bars Seized u/s 111 of Customs Act: Allahabad HC dismisses Revenue Appeals due to Low Monetary Limit [Read Order]")
Voluntary Disclosure does not align with Provisions for Misreporting or Suppression u/s 270A(9) of GST Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that voluntary disclosure misreporting of GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) during scrutiny negated the basis for misreporting under the Section...
![Voluntary Disclosure does not align with Provisions for Misreporting or Suppression u/s 270A(9) of GST Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-rajasthan-high-court-Voluntary-Disclosure-Provisions-for-Misreporting-Suppression-Provisions-taxscan.jpg "Voluntary Disclosure does not align with Provisions for Misreporting or Suppression u/s 270A(9) of GST Act: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]")
Bombay HC quashes Maharashtra VAT Order passed after Expiry of Four Years from End Relevant Period [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court held that assessment order under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act having been passed after expiry of four years from the end of the year containing period to...
![Bombay HC quashes Maharashtra VAT Order passed after Expiry of Four Years from End Relevant Period [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Bombay-high-court-Maharashtra-VAT-order-VAT-tax-act-assessment-orders-TAXSCAN.jpg "Bombay HC quashes Maharashtra VAT Order passed after Expiry of Four Years from End Relevant Period [Read Order]")
Ignored Notice Disqualifies from Natural Justice Plea: Allahabad HC upholds GST Registration Cancellation [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has upheld the cancellation of Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration stating that the ignored notice disqualifies the petitioner from claiming a violation of natural...
![Ignored Notice Disqualifies from Natural Justice Plea: Allahabad HC upholds GST Registration Cancellation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/HC-upholds-GST-Registration-Registration-Cancellation-Goods-and-Services-Tax-natural-justice-Allahabad-HC-taxscan.jpg "Ignored Notice Disqualifies from Natural Justice Plea: Allahabad HC upholds GST Registration Cancellation [Read Order]")
Proceedings initiated u/s 129 of the CGST Act without Providing Hearing Opportunity is invalid: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that proceedings initiated under section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST ) Act, 2017 without providing an opportunity to hear to the assessee is...
![Proceedings initiated u/s 129 of the CGST Act without Providing Hearing Opportunity is invalid: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court-Section-129-CGST-Act-GST-GST-Act-taxscan.jpg "Proceedings initiated u/s 129 of the CGST Act without Providing Hearing Opportunity is invalid: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]")
Lack of Observations in Appellate Order indicates Non-Application of Mind: Bombay HC remands Excise Matter to CESTAT [Read Order]
A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court quashed an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) that rejected an application by HDFC Bank to rectify a mistake, for...
![Lack of Observations in Appellate Order indicates Non-Application of Mind: Bombay HC remands Excise Matter to CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/bombay-high-court-Appellate-Order-Non-Application-of-Mind-Lack-of-Observations-Excise-Matter-taxscan.jpeg "Lack of Observations in Appellate Order indicates Non-Application of Mind: Bombay HC remands Excise Matter to CESTAT [Read Order]")