Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Erroneous GST Filing by Former Auditor: Madras HC directs Udhagamandalam Municipality Commissioner to Appear Before AO [Read Order]

The Court observed that over 25% of the tax demand had already been paid, reflecting the petitioner's bona fide intent, and held that the inadvertent lapse warranted an opportunity to rectify the filing error.

Erroneous GST Filing by Former Auditor: Madras HC directs Udhagamandalam Municipality Commissioner to Appear Before AO [Read Order]
X

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) assessment order passed under Section 63 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against the Udhagamandalam Municipality, owing to an inadvertent error in return filing by its previous auditor. The Court held that the order was passed without properly notifying the petitioner and without affording them a...




The Madras High Court has set aside a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) assessment order passed under Section 63 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against the Udhagamandalam Municipality, owing to an inadvertent error in return filing by its previous auditor.

The Court held that the order was passed without properly notifying the petitioner and without affording them a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

The petitioner, represented by the Commissioner of Udhagamandalam Municipality, had challenged the assessment order dated 21.02.2025.

Also Read: Delhi HC Declines to Exercise Writ Jurisdiction in Fraudulent GST ITC Case, Follows Mukesh Kumar Garg Precedent [Read Order]

How to Audit Public Charitable Trusts under the Income Tax Act Click Here

It was contended that the impugned order arose solely due to the incorrect filing of GST returns by the Municipality’s former auditor. Further, the Court noted that the notice preceding the order was posted in the “Additional Notices” tab of the GST portal, a section often overlooked and not prominently displayed. This lack of visibility, combined with the absence of physical or direct communication, led the petitioner to miss the notice entirely.

The Court found that the petitioner had already paid more than 25% of the demand amount, indicating a bona fide effort to comply with tax obligations. Recognizing that the lapse was neither willful nor malicious, the Court decided in favor of granting an opportunity to rectify the error.

Know the complete aspects of tax implications of succession, Click here

Justice G.R. Swaminathan, presiding over the matter, quashed the impugned assessment order and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer. The petitioner was directed to appear before the officer on 10.06.2025 at 4:00 PM, and was granted liberty to submit corrected GST returns and place all relevant materials on record.

The Court further directed the Assessing Officer to provide the Municipality with a proper opportunity of hearing and, after due consideration, pass a fresh assessment order strictly in accordance with law. The writ petition was accordingly allowed, and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.

Also Read: CGST SCN for Personal Hearing Issued on old Address: Delhi HC Allows [Read Order]

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Next Story

Related Stories

Advertisement
Advertisement
All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019