![Penalty for Delayed Excise Duty Payment to Be Calculated Only for Actual Days of Delay, Not Entire Month: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/03/2101877-penalty-delayed-excise-duty-payment-calculated-actual-delay-cestat-txn.webp "Penalty for Delayed Excise Duty Payment to Be Calculated Only for Actual Days of Delay, Not Entire Month: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalty for Delayed Excise Duty Payment to Be Calculated Only for Actual Days of Delay, Not Entire Month: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that penalties for delayed excise duty payments must be...
![Wipro Wins Excise Battle: CESTAT Upholds Transaction Value for Laptops Supplied to Govt Undertaking for Student Scheme [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/03/2101786-wipro-cestat-taxscan.webp "Wipro Wins Excise Battle: CESTAT Upholds Transaction Value for Laptops Supplied to Govt Undertaking for Student Scheme [Read Order]")
![Adani’s Circular Trading of Gold Jewellery allegations: Supreme Court takes up Matter [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/02/2101627-adanis-circular-trading-gold-jewellery-allegations-supreme-court-txn.webp "Adani’s Circular Trading of Gold Jewellery allegations: Supreme Court takes up Matter [Read Judgement]")
![CBIC Allows Post-Clearance Digital Correction of Customs Entries Under New Regulations [Read Notification]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/2101340-cbic-digital-correction-digital-correction-of-customs-customs-entries-under-new-regulations-taxscan.webp "CBIC Allows Post-Clearance Digital Correction of Customs Entries Under New Regulations [Read Notification]")
Services by HIMUDA as Governmental authority like Maintenance, Conversion, and Water Charges Not Taxable: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Chandigarh Bench has ruled in favour of the Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority (HIMUDA), holding that...
![Services by HIMUDA as Governmental authority like Maintenance, Conversion, and Water Charges Not Taxable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/2101289-cestat-chandigarh-services-by-himuda-himuda-as-governmental-authority-taxscan.webp "Services by HIMUDA as Governmental authority like Maintenance, Conversion, and Water Charges Not Taxable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Service Tax on Book Reversal Entries, Security and Electricity Deposits u/s Section 67 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Bench at Chennai, has ruled in favour of appellant., quashing a service tax demand of ₹8.83 lakh raised by the Revenue. The demand...
![No Service Tax on Book Reversal Entries, Security and Electricity Deposits u/s Section 67 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/2101299-service-tax-reversal-entries-electricity-deposits-deposits-section-67-of-finance-act-taxscan.webp "No Service Tax on Book Reversal Entries, Security and Electricity Deposits u/s Section 67 of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Service Tax without Proper Categorisation of Services: CESTAT Quashes Demands against HIMUDA for Vagueness and Lack of Specific Classification [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Chandigarh Bench, has quashed service tax demands raised against the Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority...
![No Service Tax without Proper Categorisation of Services: CESTAT Quashes Demands against HIMUDA for Vagueness and Lack of Specific Classification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/2101286-cestat-chandigarh-himuda-service-tax-taxscan.webp "No Service Tax without Proper Categorisation of Services: CESTAT Quashes Demands against HIMUDA for Vagueness and Lack of Specific Classification [Read Order]")
CENVAT Credit Denied on Endorsed Bills of Entry without Hearing: CESTAT Remands Matter to Assistant Commissioner [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has remanded a matter back to the Assistant Commissioner after finding that CENVAT credit was denied on endorsed...
![CENVAT Credit Denied on Endorsed Bills of Entry without Hearing: CESTAT Remands Matter to Assistant Commissioner [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/2101296-cenvat-credit-taxscan.webp "CENVAT Credit Denied on Endorsed Bills of Entry without Hearing: CESTAT Remands Matter to Assistant Commissioner [Read Order]")
Governmental Authorities Not ‘Business Entities’: CESTAT Rules HIMUDA Not Liable under RCM for Legal Services [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that the Himachal Pradesh Housing and Urban Development Authority (HIMUDA), being a statutory...
![Governmental Authorities Not ‘Business Entities’: CESTAT Rules HIMUDA Not Liable under RCM for Legal Services [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/2101298-rcm-cestat-chandigarh-cestat-rules-taxscan.webp "Governmental Authorities Not ‘Business Entities’: CESTAT Rules HIMUDA Not Liable under RCM for Legal Services [Read Order]")
Mere Procedural Lapse Not Penal Offence in Excess Customs Duty Drawback Claim: CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 114 & 114AA [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Bench at Chennai has set aside penalties imposed on appellant and its Managing Director for allegedly availing excess duty drawback by...
![Mere Procedural Lapse Not Penal Offence in Excess Customs Duty Drawback Claim: CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 114 & 114AA [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/2101261-penalty-cestat-taxscan.webp "Mere Procedural Lapse Not Penal Offence in Excess Customs Duty Drawback Claim: CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 114 & 114AA [Read Order]")
Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside a penalty of ₹1 lakh imposed on appellant under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that no...
![Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/2101252-cestat-mumbai-penalty-on-co-noticee-customs-act-taxscan.webp "Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]")