Attending the ICSI CSEET Exam? Most Important Guidelines and Tech Requirements for CS Aspirants
The Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) will hold the July 2025 session of the Company Secretary Executive Entrance Test (CSEET) on...
![No Bar on Retaining Cash for Reasonable Period if Source Traceable: ITAT Quashes Cash Deposit Addition During Demonetisation in absence of Corroborative Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/250x150_2057044-site-img30-.webp "No Bar on Retaining Cash for Reasonable Period if Source Traceable: ITAT Quashes Cash Deposit Addition During Demonetisation in absence of Corroborative Evidence [Read Order]")
![No Proof from Assessee, No Comparables from Income Tax Dept: ITAT cuts Ad Hoc Disallowance to 4% from 10%, Says Not to be treated as Precedent [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/250x150_2057049-itat-disallowance.webp "No Proof from Assessee, No Comparables from Income Tax Dept: ITAT cuts Ad Hoc Disallowance to 4% from 10%, Says Not to be treated as Precedent [Read Order]")
![Technical Dismissal Without Going into Merits Unsustainable: ITAT Restores back Case to Decide ₹52 Lakh Capital Loss Adjustment with Proper Reasoning [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/250x150_2057048-technical-dismissal-going-into-merits-unsustainable-merits-unsustainable-taxscan.webp "Technical Dismissal Without Going into Merits Unsustainable: ITAT Restores back Case to Decide ₹52 Lakh Capital Loss Adjustment with Proper Reasoning [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds ₹2.93 Cr Interest and ₹4.01 Cr Management Expenses Deduction Citing Business Purpose u/s 36(1)(iii) and 37(1) [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [ CIT(A) ] order that allowed deductions of Rs. 2.93 crore in interest expenses and Rs. ...
![ITAT Upholds ₹2.93 Cr Interest and ₹4.01 Cr Management Expenses Deduction Citing Business Purpose u/s 36(1)(iii) and 37(1) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2056951-business-purpose-itat-taxscan.webp "ITAT Upholds ₹2.93 Cr Interest and ₹4.01 Cr Management Expenses Deduction Citing Business Purpose u/s 36(1)(iii) and 37(1) [Read Order]")
₹2.17 Crore Income, ₹30 Lakh Tax and No Real “Rewards” from the System: X Users Split over Bangalore IT Employee’s Termination
The ongoing debate around India’s taxation system and social safety nets took center stage on social media after a post by Venkatesh Alla (@venkat_fin9) went viral on X. Alla, a vocal critic of...
No Bar on Claiming S.80P Deduction via ITR Filed u/s 142(1): ITAT Sets Aside Denial over e-Verification Delay [Read Order]
The Bengaluru Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the benefit of deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be denied merely on technical grounds...
![No Bar on Claiming S.80P Deduction via ITR Filed u/s 142(1): ITAT Sets Aside Denial over e-Verification Delay [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2057014-e-verification-delay.webp "No Bar on Claiming S.80P Deduction via ITR Filed u/s 142(1): ITAT Sets Aside Denial over e-Verification Delay [Read Order]")
Delay Should Not Defeat Meritorious Case: ITAT Condones 221-Days Delayed Appeal of Senior Citizen [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has observed that mere procedural delays should not be allowed to defeat a meritorious case, especially when the...
![Delay Should Not Defeat Meritorious Case: ITAT Condones 221-Days Delayed Appeal of Senior Citizen [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2057007-gavel.webp "Delay Should Not Defeat Meritorious Case: ITAT Condones 221-Days Delayed Appeal of Senior Citizen [Read Order]")
NRI’s Property Investment Explained with Bank Statements and Agreements: ITAT Quashes Addition Due to Jurisdictional Error
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has set aside an assessment order adding Rs. 69.99 lakh as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the...
![CESTAT quashes Service Tax Penalties, upholds Admitted Demands [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2056976-service-tax.webp "CESTAT quashes Service Tax Penalties, upholds Admitted Demands [Read Order]")