![At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050643-gst-reminder-gst-reminder-must-be-sent-via-rpad-via-rpad-taxscan.webp "At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]")
At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that before passing an ex-parte order, the tax authority must send at least one reminder notice through Registered...
![ITAT Denies Section 54F Exemption for Property Purchased in Mothers Name [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/250x150_2050580-itat-itat-roundup-weeklyrounup-taxscan-5.webp "ITAT Denies Section 54F Exemption for Property Purchased in Mothers Name [Read Order]")
![Sale of REC/ Carbon Credits are Capital Receipt: ITAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/250x150_2050590-carbon-credits-itat-quashes-capital-receipt-taxscan.webp "Sale of REC/ Carbon Credits are Capital Receipt: ITAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]")
![Failure to examine legality of ITC availed: Calcutta HC Remands Appeal of Bajaj Wheels to GST adjudicating authority [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/250x150_2050658-failure-to-examine-legality-legality-of-itc-availed-itc-calcutta-hc-taxscan.webp "Failure to examine legality of ITC availed: Calcutta HC Remands Appeal of Bajaj Wheels to GST adjudicating authority [Read Order]")
![Reopening of Assessment Without Complying with S. 143(2) Procedure Is Bad in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/250x150_2050631-procedure-procedure-is-bad-in-law-madras-high-court-taxscan.webp "Reopening of Assessment Without Complying with S. 143(2) Procedure Is Bad in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]")
NCLAT Admits Appeal in Exclusive Capital Dispute: Keeps Tribunal Proceedings Subject to Supreme Court Orders [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, has admitted an appeal filed by Exclusive Capital Limited (ECL) against interim directions passed by the ...
![NCLAT Admits Appeal in Exclusive Capital Dispute: Keeps Tribunal Proceedings Subject to Supreme Court Orders [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/500x300_2053799-nclat-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Admits Appeal in Exclusive Capital Dispute: Keeps Tribunal Proceedings Subject to Supreme Court Orders [Read Order]")
GST Portal Essentials: Know How to Accept/Reject Taxpayers' Engagement Request as a GST Practitioner
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime in India has created a framework where registered GST Practitioners (GSTPs) can perform tax-related tasks on behalf of taxpayers. However, this engagement is...
No S.153C Income Tax Assessment if Documents only ‘Pertain to’ and do Not ‘Belong to’ Assessee: ITAT Deletes ₹85L Addition [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed an aggregate tax addition of ₹85.88 lakh, observing that the proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were...
![No S.153C Income Tax Assessment if Documents only ‘Pertain to’ and do Not ‘Belong to’ Assessee: ITAT Deletes ₹85L Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/20/500x300_2050786-itat-itat-delhi-income-tax-assessment-taxscan.webp "No S.153C Income Tax Assessment if Documents only ‘Pertain to’ and do Not ‘Belong to’ Assessee: ITAT Deletes ₹85L Addition [Read Order]")
Relief to SpiceJet: ITAT Dismisses Income Tax Department Appeals on Supplementary Rent Disallowance [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that supplementary rent payments are exempt from tax in India under Section 10(15A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and not subject to ...
![Relief to SpiceJet: ITAT Dismisses Income Tax Department Appeals on Supplementary Rent Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050678-income-tax-spicejet-itat-taxscan.webp "Relief to SpiceJet: ITAT Dismisses Income Tax Department Appeals on Supplementary Rent Disallowance [Read Order]")
Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be granted without reducing the amount allowed under Section 80IB. The first question...
![Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050629-income-tax-deduction-income-tax-deduction-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]")
GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has condoned a 58-day delay in filing a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) appeal, caused by the pendency of a rectification application, and directed the authorities to hear ...
![GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050617-gst-appeal-filing-gst-appeal-pendency-in-rectification-application-taxscan.webp "GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]")
GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand of ₹16.67 crore raised against a tollway company, holding that the proceedings were mechanical and failed to consider the...
![GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050620-madras-hc-gst-demand-mismatch-itc-taxscan.webp "GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")