CBIC and Finance Ministry’s Top Initiatives: 2024 Year End Recap
The year of 2024 is passing and there have been a lot of changes and steps taken in the area of indirect taxes by the Ministry of Finance in GST,...
Connectors used in PCBAs for Mobile Phones Classified under CTH 85177090, Exempted from BCD under Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that connectors imported for use in Printed Circuit Board Assemblies (PCBAs) of mobile phones were correctly...
![Connectors used in PCBAs for Mobile Phones Classified under CTH 85177090, Exempted from BCD under Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Printed-Circuit-Board-Assemblies.jpg "Connectors used in PCBAs for Mobile Phones Classified under CTH 85177090, Exempted from BCD under Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Chettinad Cement Fails to Prove Chettinad Builders is an Associate, Not a Related Party: CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Recalculation [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that Chettinad Builders Private Limited ( CBPL ) was a "related party" as the appellant failed to prove...
![Chettinad Cement Fails to Prove Chettinad Builders is an Associate, Not a Related Party: CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Recalculation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chennai-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Chettinad-Cement-TAXSCAN.jpg "Chettinad Cement Fails to Prove Chettinad Builders is an Associate, Not a Related Party: CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Recalculation [Read Order]")
Denial of Cross-Examination upon Imposing Penalty under GST Act Violates Natural Justice: Kerala HC sets aside Order [Read Order]
In a recent case, the High Court of Kerala viewed that failure to grant an opportunity for cross examination upon imposing penalty under the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 ('CGST Act')...
![Denial of Cross-Examination upon Imposing Penalty under GST Act Violates Natural Justice: Kerala HC sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Denial-of-Cross-Examination-kerala-hc-GST-Act-sets-aside-order-Natural-Justice.jpg "Denial of Cross-Examination upon Imposing Penalty under GST Act Violates Natural Justice: Kerala HC sets aside Order [Read Order]")
Expenditure u/s 57 Justified with Established Income Nexus: ITAT allows to claim Deduction [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed the assessee to claim a deduction of Rs. 30.4 lakhs under Section 57 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as...
![Expenditure u/s 57 Justified with Established Income Nexus: ITAT allows to claim Deduction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-Section-57-of-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Expenditure u/s 57 Justified with Established Income Nexus: ITAT allows to claim Deduction [Read Order]")
![Inadequate Decision by CIT(A) on Rs. 11.45 Lacs Unexplained Money Addition: ITAT Remits Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Unexplained-Money-Commissioner-of-Income-TaxAppeals-taxscan.jpg "Inadequate Decision by CIT(A) on Rs. 11.45 Lacs Unexplained Money Addition: ITAT Remits Matter [Read Order]")