![Rs 1.90 Crore FDR Renewal Not a Fresh Investment: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099293-fdr-renewal-fresh-investment-itat-taxscan.webp "Rs 1.90 Crore FDR Renewal Not a Fresh Investment: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]")
Rs 1.90 Crore FDR Renewal Not a Fresh Investment: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs 1.90 Crore under Section 69, observing that the amount was a renewal of ...
![Awaiting CCIT order on Delayed ITR Condonation Petition: ITAT Remands on 80P Deduction Disallowance Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099278-ccit-order-delayed-itr-condonation-petition-itat-remands-80p-deduction-disallowance-taxscan.webp "Awaiting CCIT order on Delayed ITR Condonation Petition: ITAT Remands on 80P Deduction Disallowance Matter [Read Order]")
![Interest Deduction u/s 57: ITAT Allows Claim After Verifying Payments and Interest Earned [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099260-itat-verifying-payments-interest-earned-taxscan.webp "Interest Deduction u/s 57: ITAT Allows Claim After Verifying Payments and Interest Earned [Read Order]")
![Denial of S.80G Approval Due to Excess ‘Pooja Expenses’: ITAT Remands Matter to CIT(E) for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099250-pooja-expenses-itat-taxscan.webp "Denial of S.80G Approval Due to Excess ‘Pooja Expenses’: ITAT Remands Matter to CIT(E) for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]")
![CSR Donations Eligibility for Section 80G Deduction: ITAT Quashes PCIT Revision Order in Hapag Lloyd Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099265-csr-donations-eligibility-section-80g-deduction-itat-quashes-pcit-revision-order-hapag-lloyd-taxscan.webp "CSR Donations Eligibility for Section 80G Deduction: ITAT Quashes PCIT Revision Order in Hapag Lloyd Matter [Read Order]")
Non-Filing of Form 3CL Not Ground to Reopen Assessment u/s 147: Kerala HC Quashes ITAT Order Against Apollo Tyres on Limitation [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Kerala High Court held that the non-filing of Form 3CL could not be treated as suppression of material facts for reopening an assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax...
![Non-Filing of Form 3CL Not Ground to Reopen Assessment u/s 147: Kerala HC Quashes ITAT Order Against Apollo Tyres on Limitation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099258-appollo-tyres-taxscan.webp "Non-Filing of Form 3CL Not Ground to Reopen Assessment u/s 147: Kerala HC Quashes ITAT Order Against Apollo Tyres on Limitation [Read Order]")
Limitation of Income Tax Rule 68B Not Applicable to Debt Recovery under RDDB Act: Kerala High Court [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court has clarified that the limitation period prescribed under Rule 68B of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not govern recovery proceedings under the Recovery...
![Limitation of Income Tax Rule 68B Not Applicable to Debt Recovery under RDDB Act: Kerala High Court [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099248-limitation-income-tax-rule-68b-applicable-debt-recovery-under-rddb-act-kerala-high-court-taxscan.webp "Limitation of Income Tax Rule 68B Not Applicable to Debt Recovery under RDDB Act: Kerala High Court [Read Order]")
Excess Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) on Jointly Purchased Property: ITAT Restricts It to 50% and Partly Allows Appeal [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, restricting the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of Income Tax Act,1961 on a jointly ...
![Excess Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) on Jointly Purchased Property: ITAT Restricts It to 50% and Partly Allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099244-excess-addition-jointly-purchased-property-itat-partly-appeal-taxscan.webp "Excess Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) on Jointly Purchased Property: ITAT Restricts It to 50% and Partly Allows Appeal [Read Order]")
Rs. 18.76 cr Disallowed for Non-Deduction of TDS u/s 194Q: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) restored the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] in the matter, where a disallowance of Rs. 18.76 crore was made...
![Rs. 18.76 cr Disallowed for Non-Deduction of TDS u/s 194Q: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099221-nondeduction-tds-taxscan.webp "Rs. 18.76 cr Disallowed for Non-Deduction of TDS u/s 194Q: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Contributions for Business and Commercial Purposes Not Considered Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that contributions made for business and commercial purposes do not qualify as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of Income Tax...
![Contributions for Business and Commercial Purposes Not Considered Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/22/500x300_2099146-itat-surat-deemed-dividend-contributions-for-business-and-commercial-taxscan.webp "Contributions for Business and Commercial Purposes Not Considered Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]")
Bombay HC Condones 447-Day Delay by Income Tax Dept in Filing Appeal Against Acquittal in Tax Evasion Case {Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court condoned a delay of 447 days by the Income Tax Department in filing an appeal against the acquittal of an accused in a tax evasion case, observing that the ...
![Bombay HC Condones 447-Day Delay by Income Tax Dept in Filing Appeal Against Acquittal in Tax Evasion Case {Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/22/500x300_2099160-bombay-hc-income-tax-dept-filing-appeal-tax-evasion-tax-evasion-case-taxscan.webp "Bombay HC Condones 447-Day Delay by Income Tax Dept in Filing Appeal Against Acquittal in Tax Evasion Case {Read Order]")
Interest on Partner's Capital Not Restricted to Business Start Date: ITAT Deletes ₹1.83 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted an addition of ₹1,83,248 and held that the Assessing Officer (AO) was incorrect to restrict the allowance of interest paid to ...
![Interest on Partners Capital Not Restricted to Business Start Date: ITAT Deletes ₹1.83 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/22/500x300_2099130-interest-partners-capital-restricted-business-start-date-itat-disallowance-taxscan.webp "Interest on Partners Capital Not Restricted to Business Start Date: ITAT Deletes ₹1.83 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]")