![Penalty for Non-Compliance with Notice During Covid-19: ITAT Deletes It Citing Pandemic Disruptions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Penalty-Penalty-for-Non-Compliance-Non-Compliance-Covid-19-ITAT-ITAT-Deletes-It-Citing-Pandemic-Disruptions-Pandemic-Disruptions-taxscan-1.jpg "Penalty for Non-Compliance with Notice During Covid-19: ITAT Deletes It Citing Pandemic Disruptions [Read Order]")
Penalty for Non-Compliance with Notice During Covid-19: ITAT Deletes It Citing Pandemic Disruptions [Read Order]
The Agra Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT)Â deleted a penalty imposed for non-compliance with a notice during the Covid-19 pandemic,...
![CIT(A) Must Decide Ex-Parte Appeal on Merits: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-ITAT-Chennai-Ex-Parte-Ex-Parte-Appeal-on-Merits-taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) Must Decide Ex-Parte Appeal on Merits: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Failure to Consider Assessees Delay Condonation Request u/s 249(3): ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-11.jpg "Failure to Consider Assessees Delay Condonation Request u/s 249(3): ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
![Adani Infrastructure Gets Relief from ITAT: Revision Order Passed by PCIT Set Aside Due to Lack of Error and Prejudice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Adani-Infrastructure.jpg "Adani Infrastructure Gets Relief from ITAT: Revision Order Passed by PCIT Set Aside Due to Lack of Error and Prejudice [Read Order]")
![Denial of S.80P Deduction Over Late Filing: ITAT Rules Appeal Infructuous [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-ITAT-Rajkot-Section-80P-Deduction-TAXSCAN.jpg "Denial of S.80P Deduction Over Late Filing: ITAT Rules Appeal Infructuous [Read Order]")
Consideration received for Sale of Truck through Banking Channel not "Unexplained Cash Credit" u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that the consideration received for the sale of a truck through the banking channel does not qualify as "unexplained cash credit"...
![Consideration received for Sale of Truck through Banking Channel not Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Consideration-received-for-Sale-Sale-of-Truck-Banking-Channel-Unexplained-Cash-Credit-Section-68-of-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Consideration received for Sale of Truck through Banking Channel not Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Denial of Immunity from Penalty u/s 270A to Co-operative Bank: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]
The Cochin Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) restored the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) after noting that the denial of immunity from penalty under Section 270A of Income Tax...
![Denial of Immunity from Penalty u/s 270A to Co-operative Bank: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-Penalty-under-section-270A-section-270A-of-income-tax-act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Denial of Immunity from Penalty u/s 270A to Co-operative Bank: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]")
Unexplained Cash Deposit of ₹22.78 Lakh u/s 69A: ITAT Deletes Addition due to Sufficient Evidence [Read Order]
The Rajkot Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition of ₹22.78 lakh made under section 69A of Income Tax Act,1961, citing sufficient evidence supporting the cash deposits. ...
![Unexplained Cash Deposit of ₹22.78 Lakh u/s 69A: ITAT Deletes Addition due to Sufficient Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-Rajkot-Unexplained-Cash-Deposit-Unexplained-Cash-taxscan.jpg "Unexplained Cash Deposit of ₹22.78 Lakh u/s 69A: ITAT Deletes Addition due to Sufficient Evidence [Read Order]")
₹81.44 Lakh Addition for Alleged Bogus Purchases: ITAT Dismisses Appeal Due to 125-Day Delay Without Condonation Request [Read Order]
The Raipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) dismissed an appeal due to a 125-day delay without a condonation request in a matter involving an ₹81.44 lakh addition for alleged bogus...
![₹81.44 Lakh Addition for Alleged Bogus Purchases: ITAT Dismisses Appeal Due to 125-Day Delay Without Condonation Request [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Condonation-Request-Bogus-Purchases-ITAT-Raipur-taxscan.jpg "₹81.44 Lakh Addition for Alleged Bogus Purchases: ITAT Dismisses Appeal Due to 125-Day Delay Without Condonation Request [Read Order]")
![Ex-Parte Orders Due to Accountant’s Unnotified Exit: ITAT Remands Case to AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Ex-Parte-Orders-Due-to-Accountants-ITAT-Remands-Case-AO-TAXSCAN.webp "Ex-Parte Orders Due to Accountant’s Unnotified Exit: ITAT Remands Case to AO [Read Order]")
![DVO Valuation Exceeding Stamp Duty Value: ITAT Upholds Addition Based on DVO’s Report [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/DVO-Valuation-Exceeding-Stamp-Duty-Value-ITAT-DVOs-Report-TAXSCAN.jpg "DVO Valuation Exceeding Stamp Duty Value: ITAT Upholds Addition Based on DVO’s Report [Read Order]")
Assessee’s Wife’s Illness Causes Delay in Filing Tax Appeal: ITAT Condones 147-Day Delay and Remands Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Rajkot Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) condoned a 147-day delay in filing a tax appeal, citing the severe illness of the assessee's wife as a valid reason and remanded the case back...
![Assessee’s Wife’s Illness Causes Delay in Filing Tax Appeal: ITAT Condones 147-Day Delay and Remands Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Income-tax-appeal-delay-condonation.jpg "Assessee’s Wife’s Illness Causes Delay in Filing Tax Appeal: ITAT Condones 147-Day Delay and Remands Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")