![Limitation Period Expired: Delhi HC Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Reassessment-Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Limitation Period Expired: Delhi HC Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Proceedings [Read Order]")
Limitation Period Expired: Delhi HC Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Proceedings [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the High Court of Delhi set aside the reassessment proceedings initiated under section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment...
![Minor’s Income Already Clubbed in Mother’s Return Cannot Be Re-opened in Father’s Hands: ITAT Quashes Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Minor-income-tax.jpg "Minor’s Income Already Clubbed in Mother’s Return Cannot Be Re-opened in Father’s Hands: ITAT Quashes Proceedings [Read Order]")
![Interest Income Earned During Plant Setup Treated as Capital: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Decision to Delete Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/power-plant.jpg "Interest Income Earned During Plant Setup Treated as Capital: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Decision to Delete Addition [Read Order]")
![Jharkhand HC Quashes ITAT Ruling Which Deletes Addition u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg "Jharkhand HC Quashes ITAT Ruling Which Deletes Addition u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![ITAT Restores Cash Deposit Addition to AO for Fresh Examination after Assessee clarifies Bank Account Ownership [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/cash-deposit-itat-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Restores Cash Deposit Addition to AO for Fresh Examination after Assessee clarifies Bank Account Ownership [Read Order]")
Tax Exemption is Allowable to Officer belong to Scheduled Tribe: Gauhati HC Upholds Refund of Income Tax Deducted u/s 10(26) from Salary [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court allowed a request that the central government reimburse the income tax withheld from the wages of a BSF Assistant Commandant who is a member of the Scheduled Tribe. The bench...
![Tax Exemption is Allowable to Officer belong to Scheduled Tribe: Gauhati HC Upholds Refund of Income Tax Deducted u/s 10(26) from Salary [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Refund-Tax-Exemption-Salary-taxscan.jpg "Tax Exemption is Allowable to Officer belong to Scheduled Tribe: Gauhati HC Upholds Refund of Income Tax Deducted u/s 10(26) from Salary [Read Order]")
Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]
In a recent decision made by the Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), it was held that the 15% accumulation claim under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be...
![Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/rajasthan-cricket-site-img.jpg "Excess Expenditure Does Not Bar 15% Accumulation Claim u/s 11(1)(a): ITAT Relieves Rajasthan Cricket Association [Read Order]")
![ITAT Weekly Round-Up [April 27th- May 2nd]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Weekly-Round-Up-Weekly-Round-Up-ITAT-ITAT-Weekly-Round-Up-for-April-and-May-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Weekly Round-Up [April 27th- May 2nd]")
PCIT must Address Documents Submitted During Assessment in its Revisionary Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Rajkot bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) must address documents submitted during assessment in its...
![PCIT must Address Documents Submitted During Assessment in its Revisionary Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/opportunity-to-produce-necessary-documents-AO-for-verification-would-meet-the-ends-of-justice-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "PCIT must Address Documents Submitted During Assessment in its Revisionary Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]")
Disallowance u/s 56(2)(viib) Invalid Despite Evidence of Creditworthiness: ITAT upholds CIT(A) Order [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Incomme Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)]'s order, stating that the disallowance under Section 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act,1961...
![Disallowance u/s 56(2)(viib) Invalid Despite Evidence of Creditworthiness: ITAT upholds CIT(A) Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Disallowance-not-applicable-Payment-Account-Payee-Cheque-Account-Payee-DD-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Disallowance u/s 56(2)(viib) Invalid Despite Evidence of Creditworthiness: ITAT upholds CIT(A) Order [Read Order]")
Trust’s Rejection Order Lacks Date and Proper Service of Notices: ITAT remands 12A Registration Matter back to CIT(E) [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded a trust registration case under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the Commissioner of...
![Trust’s Rejection Order Lacks Date and Proper Service of Notices: ITAT remands 12A Registration Matter back to CIT(E) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Registration-ITAT-CIT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Trust’s Rejection Order Lacks Date and Proper Service of Notices: ITAT remands 12A Registration Matter back to CIT(E) [Read Order]")
ITAT Confirms CIT(A)’s Deletion of Rs.1.82 Crore Addition as Revenue Fails to Produce Contrary Evidence [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) confirmed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]’s deletion of Rs. 1.82 crore addition as revenue failed to produce contrary...
![ITAT Confirms CIT(A)’s Deletion of Rs.1.82 Crore Addition as Revenue Fails to Produce Contrary Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Income-tax-Income-tax-news-Tax-news-Corroborative-Evidence-taxscan-1.jpg "ITAT Confirms CIT(A)’s Deletion of Rs.1.82 Crore Addition as Revenue Fails to Produce Contrary Evidence [Read Order]")