![Relief to EY GDS: ITAT Upholds S. 10AA Deduction, Rules Revised Return Irrelevant as No Changes in Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/EY-GDS-ITAT-Bangalore-Deduction-taxscan.jpg "Relief to EY GDS: ITAT Upholds S. 10AA Deduction, Rules Revised Return Irrelevant as No Changes in Claim [Read Order]")
Relief to EY GDS: ITAT Upholds S. 10AA Deduction, Rules Revised Return Irrelevant as No Changes in Claim [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), held that the revised return, which did not alter the...
![ITAT Imposes ₹10,000 Cost on Taxpayer for Non-Appearance for Hearing, Remands Gift and Gold Sale Addition Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Taxpayer-for-Non-Appearance-for-Hearing-Hearing-Remands-Gift-and-Gold-Sale-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Imposes ₹10,000 Cost on Taxpayer for Non-Appearance for Hearing, Remands Gift and Gold Sale Addition Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
![Unsubstantiated Foreign Remittances Ineligible for Exemption u/s 10(4): ITAT Partly Upholds Claim of NRI [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAt-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Foreign-remittance-exemption-denied-TAXSCAN.jpg "Unsubstantiated Foreign Remittances Ineligible for Exemption u/s 10(4): ITAT Partly Upholds Claim of NRI [Read Order]")
![Clean Slate Doctrine Under IBC Prevents Income Tax Dept from Reopening Assessments Excluded from Approved RP: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Clean-Slate-Doctrine-Under-IBC-IBC-Income-Tax-Depatment-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Clean Slate Doctrine Under IBC Prevents Income Tax Dept from Reopening Assessments Excluded from Approved RP: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![CBDT notifies Revised Income Tax Return Form ITR-2 [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CBDT-Revised-Income-Tax-Return-ITR-2-taxscan.jpg "CBDT notifies Revised Income Tax Return Form ITR-2 [Read Notification]")
Settlement of dispute under DTVSV Scheme is Impossible in Stage of Issuance of Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: Patna HC [Read Order]
The Patna High Court has held that settlement of dispute under DTVSV Scheme is Impossible in stage of issuance of notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act,1961.           Domino Printing...
![Settlement of dispute under DTVSV Scheme is Impossible in Stage of Issuance of Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: Patna HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/dispute-under-DTVSV-Scheme-Stage-of-Issuance-of-Notice-Section148-of-Income-Tax-Act-Section-148-of-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Settlement of dispute under DTVSV Scheme is Impossible in Stage of Issuance of Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: Patna HC [Read Order]")
Income Tax Dept Admits Bonafide Error in Denying Requested Video Conference Hearing: Bombay HC remands for fresh Assessment [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has set aside an assessment order, after the Income Tax Department admitted it had committed a bonafide error by failing to grant the taxpayer a hearing through video...
![Income Tax Dept Admits Bonafide Error in Denying Requested Video Conference Hearing: Bombay HC remands for fresh Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CONFERENCE-INCOME-TAX-BOMBAY-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Dept Admits Bonafide Error in Denying Requested Video Conference Hearing: Bombay HC remands for fresh Assessment [Read Order]")
Income Tax Proceedings against Dissolved HUF Invalid: Calcutta HC Quashes ₹7.29 Crore Penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court quashed a penalty order of Rs. 7.29 crore, ruling that the penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act were legally unsustainable, as...
![Income Tax Proceedings against Dissolved HUF Invalid: Calcutta HC Quashes ₹7.29 Crore Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Proceedings-Calcutta-High-Court-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Proceedings against Dissolved HUF Invalid: Calcutta HC Quashes ₹7.29 Crore Penalty [Read Order]")
10-Year Extended Reassessment Invalid as Escaped Income Not Represented as Asset u/s 153A(1) Proviso: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court ruled that the 10-year reassessment window allowed under the proviso to Section 153A(1) was inapplicable as the escaped income was not represented in the...
![10-Year Extended Reassessment Invalid as Escaped Income Not Represented as Asset u/s 153A(1) Proviso: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Delhi-high-court-Extended-reassessment-under-Section-153A-TAXSCAN.jpg "10-Year Extended Reassessment Invalid as Escaped Income Not Represented as Asset u/s 153A(1) Proviso: Delhi HC [Read Order]")