Income Tax Search at Refex: Company Issues Statement Advising Not to Spread Speculations
The Income Tax Department has carried out search operations at the registered office of Refex Industries Limited and at certain other locations ...
![No Deemed Dividend on Business Advances between Holding and Subsidiary Companies u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/250x150_2111154-no-deemed-dividend-business-advances-holding-subsidiary-companies-itat-taxscan-jpg.webp "No Deemed Dividend on Business Advances between Holding and Subsidiary Companies u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]")
![Relief for Viacom 18 Media: ITAT Rules AO Made Adequate Inquiry on ₹195.32 Cr Depreciation of Goodwill, Quashes PCIT’s Revision [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111603-relief-viacom-18-media-itat-rules-ao-adequate-inquiry-depreciation-goodwill-quashes-pcits-taxscan.webp "Relief for Viacom 18 Media: ITAT Rules AO Made Adequate Inquiry on ₹195.32 Cr Depreciation of Goodwill, Quashes PCIT’s Revision [Read Order]")
![Derived From’ Means First-Degree Nexus: Supreme Court Rejects NCDC’s Claim for Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) of Income tax [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/11/250x150_2111472-derived-nexus-supreme-court-rejects-ncdcs-claim-deduction-us-361viii-of-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Derived From’ Means First-Degree Nexus: Supreme Court Rejects NCDC’s Claim for Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) of Income tax [Read Judgement]")
Interest from Bank Deposit Does Not qualify for S. 36(1)(viii) Deduction: SC says it’s Not Income ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has held that interest earned from short-term bank deposits cannot qualify for deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as such interest is not income...
![Interest from Bank Deposit Does Not qualify for S. 36(1)(viii) Deduction: SC says it’s Not Income ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/11/500x300_2111469-interest-from-bank-deposit-qualify-s-361viii-deduction-sc-income-derived-long-term-finance-taxscan.webp "Interest from Bank Deposit Does Not qualify for S. 36(1)(viii) Deduction: SC says it’s Not Income ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance [Read Judgement]")
Income tax Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) Limited to Profits ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance: Supreme Court says ‘No Deduction’ to Incidental or Ancillary income [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has ruled that the income-tax deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is available only on profits that are directly and strictly derived from the business of...
![Income tax Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) Limited to Profits ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance: Supreme Court says ‘No Deduction’ to Incidental or Ancillary income [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/11/500x300_2111464-income-tax-deduction-us-361viii-limited-profits-derived-from-long-term-finance-supreme-court-deduction-incidental-ancillary-income-taxscan.webp "Income tax Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) Limited to Profits ‘Derived From’ Long-Term Finance: Supreme Court says ‘No Deduction’ to Incidental or Ancillary income [Read Judgement]")
Relief to Anil Ambani: ITAT deletes Addition based on BUP ID, Says it’s just Internal Identifier Not Bank A/c [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that Business Partner Identification Numbers (BUP ID)s were not bank account but they were internal identifiers and upheld the ...
![Relief to Anil Ambani: ITAT deletes Addition based on BUP ID, Says it’s just Internal Identifier Not Bank A/c [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/500x300_2111304-relief-anil-ambani-itat-deletes-addition-based-bup-id-says-internal-identifier-taxscan.webp "Relief to Anil Ambani: ITAT deletes Addition based on BUP ID, Says it’s just Internal Identifier Not Bank A/c [Read Order]")
Wrong Sanction for Reopening u/s 151 Invalidates Income Tax Proceedings: Supreme Court Upholds Bombay HC Ruling [Read Order]
In a recent development, the Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court’s ruling that the Income Tax Department had obtained approval from the wrong authority for reopening an assessment, rendering...
![Wrong Sanction for Reopening u/s 151 Invalidates Income Tax Proceedings: Supreme Court Upholds Bombay HC Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/500x300_2111176-invalidates-income-tax-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Wrong Sanction for Reopening u/s 151 Invalidates Income Tax Proceedings: Supreme Court Upholds Bombay HC Ruling [Read Order]")
![UAE Company Earned ₹4+ Cr Interest in India, No ITR Required Despite TDS: Here’s Why [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2110979-uae-company-earned-interest-india-itr-required-despite-tds.webp "UAE Company Earned ₹4+ Cr Interest in India, No ITR Required Despite TDS: Here’s Why [Read Order]")