![Non-Filing of Form 10B with ITR does not bar Exemption u/s 11 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITR-ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Form-10B-Section-11-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Return-ITAT-news-Income-tax-news-taxscan.jpg "Non-Filing of Form 10B with ITR does not bar Exemption u/s 11 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Non-Filing of Form 10B with ITR does not bar Exemption u/s 11 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench Of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that non-filing of Form No. 10B with Income Tax Return ( ITR ) is a procedural...
![No Material Found during Search: ITAT deletes Addition made by AO u/s 41(1) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-in-bangalore-AO-Assessing-Officer-Section-411-ITAT-deletes-Addition-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Material Found during Search: ITAT deletes Addition made by AO u/s 41(1) [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Orders Violating Natural Justice Deemed Non-Est in Law: Madras HC Remands Matter to PCIT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Natural-Justice-Madras-HC-Madras-High-Court-PCIT-madras-high-court-on-pcit-madras-high-court-about-pcit-Violation-of-Natural-Justice-taxnews-taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Orders Violating Natural Justice Deemed Non-Est in Law: Madras HC Remands Matter to PCIT [Read Order]")
![ITAT directs AO to deletes addition of 3.92 Lakhs if Market Value difference is within 10% Tolerance limit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Mumbai-Stamp-duty-valuation-Stamp-duty-warehouse-stamp-duty-taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs AO to deletes addition of 3.92 Lakhs if Market Value difference is within 10% Tolerance limit [Read Order]")
![Relief to City Union Bank: Madras HC Defers Income Tax Dept Dues Until Bank’s Dues Are Settled [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Department-Income-Tax-Act-Madras-High-Court-City-Union-Bank-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to City Union Bank: Madras HC Defers Income Tax Dept Dues Until Bank’s Dues Are Settled [Read Order]")
Delay in Filing ITR due to COVID-19 Pandemic: ITAT remands matter to consider Condonation of Delay [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) directed CIT(A) to consider the case of the assessee by condoning the delay as the reason for delay has been...
![Delay in Filing ITR due to COVID-19 Pandemic: ITAT remands matter to consider Condonation of Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Delay-in-filing-ITR-COVID-19-COVID-19-Pandemic-ITAT-remands-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-news-taxscan.jpg "Delay in Filing ITR due to COVID-19 Pandemic: ITAT remands matter to consider Condonation of Delay [Read Order]")
Non-mentioning of Specific Limb in Income Tax Notice and Assessment Order by AO: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in a recent decision reaffirmed the need for ensuring clarity and avoiding all sorts of procedural ambiguity while issuing Notices and...
![Non-mentioning of Specific Limb in Income Tax Notice and Assessment Order by AO: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-Assessment-Order-taxscan.jpg "Non-mentioning of Specific Limb in Income Tax Notice and Assessment Order by AO: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
Hardship allowances Received From Housing Developers to Compensate Dispossession are Non Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]
Recently in a case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of Mumbai held that hardship and rehabilitation allowances received from housing developers as compensation for the hardship endured due...
![Hardship allowances Received From Housing Developers to Compensate Dispossession are Non Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Hardship-Allowances-Non-Taxable-Compensate-Dispossession-ITAT-News-taxscan.jpg "Hardship allowances Received From Housing Developers to Compensate Dispossession are Non Taxable: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Penalty after Completion of Scrutiny Assessment u/s 143(3) of IT Act, when necessary Evidence is Furnished: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court directed for the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Assessment Unit ( AO ) and set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), even after the petitioner has...
![No Penalty after Completion of Scrutiny Assessment u/s 143(3) of IT Act, when necessary Evidence is Furnished: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Scrutiny-Assessment-Delhi-High-Court-ITAT-penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty after Completion of Scrutiny Assessment u/s 143(3) of IT Act, when necessary Evidence is Furnished: ITAT [Read Order]")
Consolidated Penalty u/s 271D and 271E of Income Tax Act not leviable without Specifying Individual Cash Transactions: ITAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Cochin Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the consolidated penalty under section 271D and 271E of Income Tax Act (ITA) cannot be levied without specifying...
![Consolidated Penalty u/s 271D and 271E of Income Tax Act not leviable without Specifying Individual Cash Transactions: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-Cochin-ITAT-Income-Tax-individual-cash-transactions-Cash-Transactions-Penalty-Consolidated-Penalty-taxscan.webp "Consolidated Penalty u/s 271D and 271E of Income Tax Act not leviable without Specifying Individual Cash Transactions: ITAT [Read Order]")
Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act Unjustified Due to Incorrect Tax Neutrality: ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[ CIT(A)] order, observing that the reopening of assessment was based on incorrect facts...
![Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act Unjustified Due to Incorrect Tax Neutrality: ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Income-Tax-Commissioner-Tax-Neutrality-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act Unjustified Due to Incorrect Tax Neutrality: ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order [Read Order]")