![Unreasoned approval by PCCIT is not valid for Reopening of Income Tax Assessment: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Unreasoned-PCCIT-Reopening-Income-Tax-Assessment-Delhi-HC-taxscan.jpg "Unreasoned approval by PCCIT is not valid for Reopening of Income Tax Assessment: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Unreasoned approval by PCCIT is not valid for Reopening of Income Tax Assessment: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has ruled that simply appending the word "approved" by the PCCIT when granting approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act...
![Interest Expenditure incurred for Earning Income Chargeable under Income from Business and Profession Eligible for Deduction u/s 36(1)(iii): ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/TAT-Deduction-Interest-Expenditure-Income-from-Business-Income-from-Other-Sources-Section-361iii-of-the-Income-Tax-ITAT-Raipur-taxscan.webp "Interest Expenditure incurred for Earning Income Chargeable under Income from Business and Profession Eligible for Deduction u/s 36(1)(iii): ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT Restores Case to AO for Proper Verification of Rs. 18.5 Lakhs Unexplained Cash Additions from Opening Balance and Unsecured Loans [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-ITAT-AO-issues-Opening-Balance-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Restores Case to AO for Proper Verification of Rs. 18.5 Lakhs Unexplained Cash Additions from Opening Balance and Unsecured Loans [Read Order]")
![Non Compliance with Section 153(3) of Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court bars Passing of Fresh Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Non-Compliance-Income-Tax-Act-Delhi-High-Court-bars-Passing-Fresh-Assessment-Order-taxscan.jpg "Non Compliance with Section 153(3) of Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court bars Passing of Fresh Assessment Order [Read Order]")
![Cash Sales Evidence not Produced to Prove genuineness of Cash Deposit Made During Demonetisation Period: ITAT directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-directs-Adjudication-Cash-Sales-Fresh-Adjudication-Cash-Deposit-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Appeals-taxscan.webp "Cash Sales Evidence not Produced to Prove genuineness of Cash Deposit Made During Demonetisation Period: ITAT directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Income Computation Admitted Before CIT(A) cannot be Easily Contested at Tribunal Level: ITAT [Read Order]
The Nagpur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) emphasizing that once the assessee’s income computation is admitted before...
![Income Computation Admitted Before CIT(A) cannot be Easily Contested at Tribunal Level: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-CITA-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Appeals-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Taxscan.webp "Income Computation Admitted Before CIT(A) cannot be Easily Contested at Tribunal Level: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Section 80IA Deduction not allowable for Belated Income Tax Returns: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-Income-Tax-Returns-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-Calcutta-High-Court-ITAT-Nagpur-Section-80IA-Deduction-taxscan.jpg "Section 80IA Deduction not allowable for Belated Income Tax Returns: ITAT [Read Order]")
Bombay HC slaps Income Tax JAO and Chief Commissioner with Rs. 25k Fine for ignorance of Hexaware Decision [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has imposed a fine of Rs. 25,000 on the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) for failing to adhere to a binding judgement in the case of Hexaware Technologies Limited vs....
![Bombay HC slaps Income Tax JAO and Chief Commissioner with Rs. 25k Fine for ignorance of Hexaware Decision [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Bombay-HC-Income-Tax-JAO-Chief-Commissioner-Fine-for-ignorance-Hexaware-Decision-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC slaps Income Tax JAO and Chief Commissioner with Rs. 25k Fine for ignorance of Hexaware Decision [Read Order]")
No Affidavit showing Cause of 2086-Day Delay in Filing Income Tax Appeal: ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision dismissing Appeal in-limine [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], dismissing an appeal that was delayed by 2086 days. The...
![No Affidavit showing Cause of 2086-Day Delay in Filing Income Tax Appeal: ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision dismissing Appeal in-limine [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/TAT-ITAT-upholds-CITA-Income-Tax-Appeal-Income-Tax-Filing-Income-Tax-Appeal-Filing-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "No Affidavit showing Cause of 2086-Day Delay in Filing Income Tax Appeal: ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision dismissing Appeal in-limine [Read Order]")
![Non-mentioning of Reason for dismissal of appeal by CIT(A): ITAT remands Income Tax matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-Ranchi-ITAT-Appeal-CIT-under-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Non-mentioning of Reason for dismissal of appeal by CIT(A): ITAT remands Income Tax matter [Read Order]")
AO lacked Jurisdiction to Initiate Proceedings: ITAT quashes Order u/s 153C of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
Recently, The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed an order passed under section 153C of the Income Tax ACT 1961 (ITA) against assessee for the assessment year...
![AO lacked Jurisdiction to Initiate Proceedings: ITAT quashes Order u/s 153C of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Assessing-Officer-section-153C-of-the-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Jurisdiction-Taxscan.jpg "AO lacked Jurisdiction to Initiate Proceedings: ITAT quashes Order u/s 153C of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")