Ingredients for Invocation of Extended Period not Alleged: CESTAT upholds Non-Imposition of Penalty u/s 11A of Central Excise Act [Read Order]

The CESTAT upheld the non-imposition of penalty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act as there was no allegation for invocation of extended period

By Kalyani B. Nair - On February 7, 2024 2:33 pm - 2 mins read

CESTAT - CESTAT Chandigarh - Non Imposition of Penalty - Penalty - Excise - Customs - TAXSCAN

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upheld the non-imposition of penalty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as there was no allegation for invocation of extended period. Department was of the opinion that these duties and cesses are not notified for grant of…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?

Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
Receive Daily newsletters
Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)

₹1199 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Topics