Sandhra Suresh
![Entry 54 Omission of State List No Bar: Kerala HC Upholds S.174 KGST Saving Pre-GST Liabilities Against Josco Jewellers [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/17/500x300_2106064-omission-of-state-list-kerala-hc-pre-gst-liabilities-josco-jewellers-taxscan.webp "Entry 54 Omission of State List No Bar: Kerala HC Upholds S.174 KGST Saving Pre-GST Liabilities Against Josco Jewellers [Read Order]")
Entry 54 Omission of State List No Bar: Kerala HC Upholds S.174 KGST Saving Pre-GST Liabilities Against Josco Jewellers [Read Order]
In a batch of writ petitions led by Josco Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., the Kerala High Court has delivered a decisive ruling on the scope of State...
![Delhi HC Denies Customs Duty Exemption of ₹56.15 Cr on Aircraft Import: Supreme Court to Hear East India Hotels’ Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/17/250x150_2105938-aircraft-site-image.webp "Delhi HC Denies Customs Duty Exemption of ₹56.15 Cr on Aircraft Import: Supreme Court to Hear East India Hotels’ Appeal [Read Order]")
![Hostel Use by Working-Class Tenants Constitutes Residential Occupancy: Madras HC Sets Aside Commercial Tax Demands [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/250x150_2104904-working-class-tenants-commercial-tax-demands-taxscan.webp "Hostel Use by Working-Class Tenants Constitutes Residential Occupancy: Madras HC Sets Aside Commercial Tax Demands [Read Order]")
![Failure to Opt u/s 115BAA and File Form 10‑IC Bars Concessional Tax: Supreme Court upholds Delhi HC Order Against Appellant [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/17/250x150_2105901-supreme-court-upholds-delhi-hc-order-against-appellant-taxscan.webp "Failure to Opt u/s 115BAA and File Form 10‑IC Bars Concessional Tax: Supreme Court upholds Delhi HC Order Against Appellant [Read Order]")
Delhi HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹2.4 Cr Foreign Cigarette Smuggling Case: SC Admits SLP Challenging Rejection [Read Order]
The Supreme Court of India has admitted the Special Leave Petition filed by the appellant in a high-stakes smuggling case involving foreign-origin cigarettes worth ₹2.4 crore. The relief comes in...
![Delhi HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹2.4 Cr Foreign Cigarette Smuggling Case: SC Admits SLP Challenging Rejection [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/17/500x300_2105957-foreign-cigarette-smuggling-case-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹2.4 Cr Foreign Cigarette Smuggling Case: SC Admits SLP Challenging Rejection [Read Order]")
Wrong Tax Advice Not a ‘Sufficient Cause’ for 1,370-Day Delay: ITAT Says Assessee Cannot Shift Entire Blame to Consultant [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has dismissed the appeal on grounds of an inordinate delay of 1,370 days in filing, holding that the assessee’s reliance on its...
![Wrong Tax Advice Not a ‘Sufficient Cause’ for 1,370-Day Delay: ITAT Says Assessee Cannot Shift Entire Blame to Consultant [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/14/500x300_2105140-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Wrong Tax Advice Not a ‘Sufficient Cause’ for 1,370-Day Delay: ITAT Says Assessee Cannot Shift Entire Blame to Consultant [Read Order]")
Reassessment in Wrong Year and Notice Beyond Limitation: ITAT Quashes ₹2.13 Cr Additions u/s 50C [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Indore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the assessee for AY...
![Reassessment in Wrong Year and Notice Beyond Limitation: ITAT Quashes ₹2.13 Cr Additions u/s 50C [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104877-reassessment-itat-taxscan.webp "Reassessment in Wrong Year and Notice Beyond Limitation: ITAT Quashes ₹2.13 Cr Additions u/s 50C [Read Order]")
Promotional Expenses for Dealer Scheme Recognised as Liquor Business Expenditure: ITAT Deletes ₹16.22 Lakh Addition [Read Order]
The Nagpur bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed the appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2014–15, holding that ₹16.22 lakh claimed as promotional expenses under a dealer scheme were...
![Promotional Expenses for Dealer Scheme Recognised as Liquor Business Expenditure: ITAT Deletes ₹16.22 Lakh Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104839-promotional-expenses-dealer-scheme-liquor-business-expenditure-itat-taxscan.webp "Promotional Expenses for Dealer Scheme Recognised as Liquor Business Expenditure: ITAT Deletes ₹16.22 Lakh Addition [Read Order]")
Additions on Cash Deposits and Property Purchase Made Without Proper Appraisal of Evidence: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification [Read Order]
The Nagpur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions made under Sections 69A, 69C, and 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act against an individual taxpayer, holding that the...
![Additions on Cash Deposits and Property Purchase Made Without Proper Appraisal of Evidence: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104797-whatsapp-image-2025-11-13-at-103613-am.webp "Additions on Cash Deposits and Property Purchase Made Without Proper Appraisal of Evidence: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification [Read Order]")