Sufficient Evidences adduced to allege Clandestine Removal: CESTAT upholds Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]

allege Clandestine Removal - CESTAT upholds Penalty - Central Excise Rules - Clandestine Removal - upholds Penalty - CESTAT - CESTAT News - Excise - Customs - Service Tax -Tax News - TAXSCAN

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), upheld the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the proof that sufficient evidences adduced to allege clandestine removal. Intelligence was received that Appellant (Shri Paresh Tyagi) and his brother Shri Pintu Tyagi (Expired on 17.06.2013) and were…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹1599 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now