No Time Limitation for Section 66(1) Fraudulent Trading Actions: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that there is no look-back period limitation for actions under Section 66(1) of the...
![Writ Petition Founded on Misrepresentation and Suppression: Calcutta HC Upholds WBIDC’s Transfer Fee Demand and Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/12/250x150_2111750-writ-petition-founded-misrepresentation-suppression-calcutta-hc-upholds-wbidcs-transfer-fee-demand-dismisses-appeal.webp "Writ Petition Founded on Misrepresentation and Suppression: Calcutta HC Upholds WBIDC’s Transfer Fee Demand and Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
![Pre- Existing Dispute Defence Mere Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores CIRP Admission Against Engineering Company [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/16/250x150_2112636-supreme-court-restores-cirp-admission-against-engineering-company-taxscan.webp "Pre- Existing Dispute Defence Mere Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores CIRP Admission Against Engineering Company [Read Order]")
![Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete Supreme Court Cases [Part II]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/250x150_2112795-annual-tax-corporate-law-digest-2025-complete-supreme-court-cases-part-2-taxscan.webp "Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete Supreme Court Cases [Part II]")
Interlocutory Orders Merge with Final Dismissal, Cannot Be Used Independently: NCLAT Bars Extraction of Stray Findings from Dismissed Company Petition [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruled that all interlocutory and docket orders merged with the final dismissal of a company petition and lost their independent...
![Interlocutory Orders Merge with Final Dismissal, Cannot Be Used Independently: NCLAT Bars Extraction of Stray Findings from Dismissed Company Petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/13/500x300_2111927-interlocutory-orders-merge-final-dismissal-cannot-used-independently-nclat-bars-extraction-stray-findings-dismissed-company-petition-taxscan.webp "Interlocutory Orders Merge with Final Dismissal, Cannot Be Used Independently: NCLAT Bars Extraction of Stray Findings from Dismissed Company Petition [Read Order]")
![NCLAT Distinguishes Fraudulent Trading from Wrongful Trading Provisions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/500x300_2111093-nclat-distinguishes-fraudulent-trading-wrongful-trading-provisions-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Distinguishes Fraudulent Trading from Wrongful Trading Provisions [Read Order]")
Form‑B Contemplates Mutual Dealings: NCLAT Admits CNH Industrial’s ₹3.40 Cr Net Claim After Set‑off but Confirms Nil Payout in CIRP [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), principal bench, New Delhi, in a recent case, has clarified that Form B under the CIRP Regulations permits disclosure of mutual dealings and...
![Form‑B Contemplates Mutual Dealings: NCLAT Admits CNH Industrial’s ₹3.40 Cr Net Claim After Set‑off but Confirms Nil Payout in CIRP [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/500x300_2110902-nclat-admits-cnh-industrials-taxscan.jfif "Form‑B Contemplates Mutual Dealings: NCLAT Admits CNH Industrial’s ₹3.40 Cr Net Claim After Set‑off but Confirms Nil Payout in CIRP [Read Order]")
![NCLAT upholds ₹36.53 Crore Liability against Former Directors in Fraudulent Trading Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110721-nclat-upholds-liability-former-directors-fraudulent-trading-case.webp "NCLAT upholds ₹36.53 Crore Liability against Former Directors in Fraudulent Trading Case [Read Order]")
Forgery Allegations on Subsequent Guarantees Cannot Discharge an Earlier Continuing Guarantee: NCLAT Upholds SBI’s Section 95 Petition [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has upheld the initiation of insolvency resolution proceedings against a personal guarantor under Section 95 of...
![Forgery Allegations on Subsequent Guarantees Cannot Discharge an Earlier Continuing Guarantee: NCLAT Upholds SBI’s Section 95 Petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/500x300_2108733-forgery-allegations-subsequent-discharge-guarantee-nclat-upholds-sbi-taxscan.webp "Forgery Allegations on Subsequent Guarantees Cannot Discharge an Earlier Continuing Guarantee: NCLAT Upholds SBI’s Section 95 Petition [Read Order]")
![Contractor accepting Flats as Payment Cannot be Reclassified as a Financial Creditor: NCLT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/500x300_2108811-flat-contracting-taxscan.jfif "Contractor accepting Flats as Payment Cannot be Reclassified as a Financial Creditor: NCLT [Read Order]")
