Read all Latest Updates on and about Section 11A of the Central Excise Act

Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Home
»
Section 11A of the...

CESTAT Weekly Round-up

Adjournment Not a Matter of Right: CESTAT Refuses to Entertain Late E-mail Request after Pronouncing Order in Open Court M/s Purple Products Pvt....

Relief for Bridgestone India: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹96 Lakh Excise Demand for Alleged Excess CENVAT...

No Interest on Belated Excise Duty where Situation is Revenue-Neutral: Calcutta HC Upholds CESTAT...

Inadvertent Wrong Citation of Notification Not Fatal When Eligibility Conditions are same: CESTAT...

Annual Tax & Corporate Law Digest 2025: Complete Supreme Court Cases [Part IV]

Input-Output Ratio Insufficient to Prove Clandestine Removal of Pig Iron: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand and Penalties [Read Order]

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside an excise duty demand exceeding ₹5.10 crore relating to alleged clandestine clearance of pig iron, holding...

Finalization of Provisional Assessment after 5 Years Invalid: CESTAT Quashes Differential Duty Demand issued Without S. 28 SCN [Read Order]

The Chandigarh bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside a differential duty demand and ruled that the finalization of a provisional assessment cannot be made ...

Clandestine Removal must be proven through Complete Chain of Evidence, Not Estimates or Assumptions: CESTAT [Read Order]

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that allegations of clandestine removal cannot be sustained unless the department establishes a complete...

Sending Testing Samples to In-House Laboratory Not Exciseable Activity: CESTAT quashes Excise ₹2.57 Crore Demand against Navin Fluorine [Read Order]

The New Delhi bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has quashed a demand of ₹2.57 crore against the famous Navin Fluorine International Limited, holding that...

‘Hopelessly Timebarred’: Allahabad HC Strikes Down 2021 Excise SCN for Reopening Settled MODVAT Issue Concluded 16 years ago [Read Order]

The Allahabad High Court quashed a 2021 show cause notice issued by the Central Excise authorities calling it time-barred and beyond jurisdiction, as it sought to reopen a MODVAT issue that had...

Exempted Supplies made to ICB-based Petroleum Project: CESTAT quashes ₹87 Lakh Excise Demand [Read Order]

The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed an excise duty demand of ₹87,71,656 against appellant, ruling that subcontractors supplying goods to ...

Time Barred SCN Beyond Statutory One-Year Period: CESTAT allows Cum-Duty Benefit and sets aside Time-Barred Excise Demand [Read Order]

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore Regional Bench, has ruled that one of the two excise duty demands was time-barred and that the assessee is entitled to...