![ITAT Remands Case in Reassessment Dispute after Assessee Seeks Fresh Opportunity, Imposes Cost for Non-Compliance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/12/500x300_2042833-itat-itat-ahmedabad-reassessment-taxscan.webp "ITAT Remands Case in Reassessment Dispute after Assessee Seeks Fresh Opportunity, Imposes Cost for Non-Compliance [Read Order]")
ITAT Remands Case in Reassessment Dispute after Assessee Seeks Fresh Opportunity, Imposes Cost for Non-Compliance [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded a reassessment matter involving the assessee, Naimishbhai Kantibhai Patel,...
![Non Compliance to Income Tax Notices Due to working in Saudi Arabia: ITAT Remands Rs.1.90 Cr Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Notices-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non Compliance to Income Tax Notices Due to working in Saudi Arabia: ITAT Remands Rs.1.90 Cr Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![No Tangible Evidence to Prove GE Steam Power has PE in India: Delhi HC sets aside Reassessment Notices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Delhi-High-court-GE-Steam-Power-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Tangible Evidence to Prove GE Steam Power has PE in India: Delhi HC sets aside Reassessment Notices [Read Order]")
![Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 98 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Citing Taxpayer’s Illiteracy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Filing-Appeal-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 98 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Citing Taxpayer’s Illiteracy [Read Order]")
![Notice Issued u/s 148 of Income Tax Act cannot be Challenged through Writ Petition After Passing of Assessment Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Calcutta-High-Court-Income-tax-Section-148-of-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Notice Issued u/s 148 of Income Tax Act cannot be Challenged through Writ Petition After Passing of Assessment Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Mere Mention of Sale and Estimated Gain, No Tangible Material Linking Deceased CFO to Escaped Income: ITAT Invalidates Reopening [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the reassessment proceedings against the legal heir of a deceased CFO, ruling that the reopening of assessment under Section 147 of...
![Mere Mention of Sale and Estimated Gain, No Tangible Material Linking Deceased CFO to Escaped Income: ITAT Invalidates Reopening [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.jpg "Mere Mention of Sale and Estimated Gain, No Tangible Material Linking Deceased CFO to Escaped Income: ITAT Invalidates Reopening [Read Order]")
Reopening u/s 147 Must Be Based on Specific and Clear Grounds, Not Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes ₹68L Addition [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reason for reopening under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be on definite and specific grounds. It...
![Reopening u/s 147 Must Be Based on Specific and Clear Grounds, Not Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes ₹68L Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Kolkata-Reopening-under-section-147-TAXSCAN.jpg "Reopening u/s 147 Must Be Based on Specific and Clear Grounds, Not Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes ₹68L Addition [Read Order]")
![ITAT Weekly Round-Up [April 1st-26th]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-Income-tax-news-Income-tax-updates-ITAT-Tax-judgments-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Weekly Round-Up [April 1st-26th]")
AO Provided Only 6 Days to Reply to Notice Instead of Mandatory 7 u/s 148A(b): ITAT Quashes Reassessment [Read Order]
The Raipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the Assessing Officer (AO) violating the mandatory statutory timeline prescribed under Section...
![AO Provided Only 6 Days to Reply to Notice Instead of Mandatory 7 u/s 148A(b): ITAT Quashes Reassessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-ITAT-Raipur-reassessment-notice-Income-Tax-reassessment-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO Provided Only 6 Days to Reply to Notice Instead of Mandatory 7 u/s 148A(b): ITAT Quashes Reassessment [Read Order]")
![Cash Deposits Were Duly Recorded in NBFC’s Books: ITAT Deletes Rs. 14.84 Lakh Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-ITAT-Chennai-Cash-deposits-recorded-NBFC-books-TAXSCAN.jpg "Cash Deposits Were Duly Recorded in NBFC’s Books: ITAT Deletes Rs. 14.84 Lakh Addition [Read Order]")
Bombay HC sets aside Income Tax Reassessment Order in Citing Violation of mandatory unamended provisions under Section 144B [Read Order]
In a ruling, the Bombay High Court sets aside Income Tax Reassessment Order in violation of mandatory unamended provisions under Section 144B, read with the first proviso to Section 147 of the...
![Bombay HC sets aside Income Tax Reassessment Order in Citing Violation of mandatory unamended provisions under Section 144B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Tax-Reassessment-Order.jpg "Bombay HC sets aside Income Tax Reassessment Order in Citing Violation of mandatory unamended provisions under Section 144B [Read Order]")
ITAT Confirms ₹4.10 Cr Addition U/s 69, Upholds Courts’ Authority to Dismiss Defaulted Cases [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) of Surat upheld the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to...
![ITAT Confirms ₹4.10 Cr Addition U/s 69, Upholds Courts’ Authority to Dismiss Defaulted Cases [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-Section-69-Income-tax-act-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Confirms ₹4.10 Cr Addition U/s 69, Upholds Courts’ Authority to Dismiss Defaulted Cases [Read Order]")