Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified For Indian Overseas Bank’s Mistaken DTAA Claim on Hong Kong Income: Madras HC [Read Order] Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified For Indian Overseas Bank’s Mistaken DTAA Claim on Hong Kong Income: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/13/2129179-madras-high-court-indian-overseas-bank-dtaa-hong-kong-dtaa-claim-case-indian-overseas-bank-case-taxscan.webp)
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified For Indian Overseas Bank’s Mistaken DTAA Claim on Hong Kong Income: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has held that a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IncomeTax Act cannot be imposed on the Indian...


![Penalty to be Levied on Tax Amount Sought to be Evaded: ITAT Reduces Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) After Adjusting TDS and Self-Assessment Tax [Read Order] Penalty to be Levied on Tax Amount Sought to be Evaded: ITAT Reduces Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) After Adjusting TDS and Self-Assessment Tax [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/11/2124665-penalty-levied-tax-amount-sought-evaded-itat-reduces-penalty.webp)
![ITAT grants Delta Air Lines Inc. exemption under Article 8 of India-USA DTAA for Code Sharing Transportation [Read Order] ITAT grants Delta Air Lines Inc. exemption under Article 8 of India-USA DTAA for Code Sharing Transportation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/11/2104254-itat-delta-air-lines-inc-india-usa-dtaa-sharing-transportation-taxscan.webp)
![Disallowance Restricted to 12.5% in Quantum Appeal: ITAT Deletes Penalty Citing Faulty Charge [Read Order] Disallowance Restricted to 12.5% in Quantum Appeal: ITAT Deletes Penalty Citing Faulty Charge [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/16/2097123-itat-mumbai-disallowance-penalty-taxscan.webp)
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act Requires Verification of Loss: ITAT Orders Re-Examination [Read Order] Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act Requires Verification of Loss: ITAT Orders Re-Examination [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/23/2090163-tat-mumbai-income-tax-act-penalty-taxscanjpge.webp)
![Relief to Aircel Ltd: Madras HC quashes Income tax Penalty Proceedings as No hearing Granted, Hardly 24 Hrs Granted to Furnish Reply [Read Order] Relief to Aircel Ltd: Madras HC quashes Income tax Penalty Proceedings as No hearing Granted, Hardly 24 Hrs Granted to Furnish Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/2070282-aircel-ltd-taxscan.webp)
![Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order] Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/2063729-deduction-deduction-claim-deduction-claim-on-unpaid-ad-hoc-bonus-ad-hoc-bonus-taxscan.webp)

![Defective Income Tax Notice Invalidates S. 271(1)(C) Proceedings: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order] Defective Income Tax Notice Invalidates S. 271(1)(C) Proceedings: ITAT Deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/25/2054276-penalty-income-tax-act-imposed-for-mistake-by-accountant-itat-taxscan.webp)
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Invalid Without Clear Specification of Grounds in Notice: Delhi HC [Read Order] Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Invalid Without Clear Specification of Grounds in Notice: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Penalty.jpg)
![‘Clear-Cut Case of Concealment’: ITAT Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Rs 2.65 Crore Bogus Share Capital [Reaed Order] ‘Clear-Cut Case of Concealment’: ITAT Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Rs 2.65 Crore Bogus Share Capital [Reaed Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Clear-Cut-Case-Concealment-ITAT-Penalty-Under-Bogus-Share-Capital-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![Taxpayer Underreports Income by Claiming Inadmissible Expenses: ITAT Confirms Penalty [Read Order] Taxpayer Underreports Income by Claiming Inadmissible Expenses: ITAT Confirms Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Penalty-Taxpayer-ITAT-Confirms-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg)