![Relief to Vodafone: CESTAT Clarifies CENVAT Credit on Debit Notes Valid Under Rule 9 if Essential Details Are Present, Sets Aside Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Vodafone-CENVAT-Credit-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to Vodafone: CESTAT Clarifies CENVAT Credit on Debit Notes Valid Under Rule 9 if Essential Details Are Present, Sets Aside Demand Order [Read Order]")
Relief to Vodafone: CESTAT Clarifies CENVAT Credit on Debit Notes Valid Under Rule 9 if Essential Details Are Present, Sets Aside Demand Order [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that CENVAT credit on debit notes is allowable under...
![Use of r-DNA Technology in Manufacturing of Diabetes Insulin amounts to A Mono Component Insulin: CESTAT allows Customs Duty Exemption [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-Chennai-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Customs-Customs-Duty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Use of r-DNA Technology in Manufacturing of Diabetes Insulin amounts to A Mono Component Insulin: CESTAT allows Customs Duty Exemption [Read Order]")
Service Tax Must Be Levied on Contract-Specific Basis between Provider and Recipient: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has ruled that the service tax must be levied considering contract-specific basis between the service provider and the recipient. The bench was dealing with...
![Service Tax Must Be Levied on Contract-Specific Basis between Provider and Recipient: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Madras-High-Court-Service-Tax-Madras-HC-service-tax-ruling-Contract-service-tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Service Tax Must Be Levied on Contract-Specific Basis between Provider and Recipient: Madras HC [Read Order]")
75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]
The Madras High Court granted an opportunity to explain the discrepancies between the form GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B as 75% disputed Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) has already been paid. Shri Yamuna, the...
![75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GSTR-GSTR-1-GSTR-3B-Madras-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]")
Petition u/s 7 of IBC Has to be Decide first When Both Arbitration & Insolvency Petitions are Pending: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) held that the petition under section 7 of Insolvency Bankruptcy Code ( IBC ),2016 has to be decided first when both...
Dissolution Of Corporate Debtor u/s 54 of IBC can be Sought after Complete Liquidation: NCLAT [Read Order]
In a significant case, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) held that the scheme of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code ( IBC ), 2016 clearly provides that...
![Document Name being ‘Debit Note is no Reason to Deny CENVAT Credit to Vodafone: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Customs-Vodafone-CENVAT-Credit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Document Name being ‘Debit Note is no Reason to Deny CENVAT Credit to Vodafone: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Adjudicating Authority have Inherent Power to Recall Its Judgement But Has No Power To Review: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) has held that adjudicating authority have inherent power to recall its judgement but has no power to review. The Tribunal clarified that the...
