No Appeal under Section 61 may be Filed Against an Order which is not Covered by Part II of I & B Code: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that since the Impugned Order does not fall to be a part of any of the...
![CESTAT upholds Duty Valuation under Rule 10A, Rejects Vehicle Manufacturers appeal on Refund Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Duty-Valuation-Vehicle-Manufacturer-appeal-Refund-Claim-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Duty Valuation under Rule 10A, Rejects Vehicle Manufacturers appeal on Refund Claim [Read Order]")
![Relief to Vodafone: CESTAT Clarifies CENVAT Credit on Debit Notes Valid Under Rule 9 if Essential Details Are Present, Sets Aside Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Vodafone-CENVAT-Credit-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to Vodafone: CESTAT Clarifies CENVAT Credit on Debit Notes Valid Under Rule 9 if Essential Details Are Present, Sets Aside Demand Order [Read Order]")
Use of r-DNA Technology in Manufacturing of Diabetes Insulin amounts to A Mono Component Insulin: CESTAT allows Customs Duty Exemption [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that Use of r-DNA Technology in Manufacturing of Diabetes Insulin Amounts to A Mono Component Insulin and...
![Use of r-DNA Technology in Manufacturing of Diabetes Insulin amounts to A Mono Component Insulin: CESTAT allows Customs Duty Exemption [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-Chennai-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Customs-Customs-Duty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Use of r-DNA Technology in Manufacturing of Diabetes Insulin amounts to A Mono Component Insulin: CESTAT allows Customs Duty Exemption [Read Order]")
Relief BOI, NCLT Directs to Admit CIRP When Statutory Criteria u/s 7 of IBC Is Satisfied [Read Order]
The National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ), Mumbai bench directed to admit Cooperate Insolvency Resolution Proceedings ( CIRP ) when statutory criteria under section 7 of Insolvency Bankruptcy Code (...
Service Tax Must Be Levied on Contract-Specific Basis between Provider and Recipient: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has ruled that the service tax must be levied considering contract-specific basis between the service provider and the recipient. The bench was dealing with...
![Service Tax Must Be Levied on Contract-Specific Basis between Provider and Recipient: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Madras-High-Court-Service-Tax-Madras-HC-service-tax-ruling-Contract-service-tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Service Tax Must Be Levied on Contract-Specific Basis between Provider and Recipient: Madras HC [Read Order]")
75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]
The Madras High Court granted an opportunity to explain the discrepancies between the form GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B as 75% disputed Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) has already been paid. Shri Yamuna, the...
![75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GSTR-GSTR-1-GSTR-3B-Madras-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "75% Disputed GST already Paid: Madras HC grants Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies between Form GSTR-1 and 3B [Read Order]")
Petition u/s 7 of IBC Has to be Decide first When Both Arbitration & Insolvency Petitions are Pending: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) held that the petition under section 7 of Insolvency Bankruptcy Code ( IBC ),2016 has to be decided first when both...
Dissolution Of Corporate Debtor u/s 54 of IBC can be Sought after Complete Liquidation: NCLAT [Read Order]
In a significant case, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) held that the scheme of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code ( IBC ), 2016 clearly provides that...
