![Improper Procedure adopted by Manufacturer cannot be treated as ‘Illegal’: CESTAT allows Excise Duty Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Manufacturer-Illegal-CESTAT-Excise-Duty-Refund-Taxscan.jpg "Improper Procedure adopted by Manufacturer cannot be treated as ‘Illegal’: CESTAT allows Excise Duty Refund [Read Order]")
Improper Procedure adopted by Manufacturer cannot be treated as ‘Illegal’: CESTAT allows Excise Duty Refund [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai bench has held that an improper procedure adopted by the manufacturer cannot...
![Attempt to Smuggle Prohibited Goods cannot be Brushed aside as mere Violation of CBLR: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Prohibited-Goods-CBLR-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Attempt to Smuggle Prohibited Goods cannot be Brushed aside as mere Violation of CBLR: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Interest on Pre-Deposit not available If Refund of Pre-Deposit sanctioned within Three Months: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Interest-Refund-Pre-Deposit-sanctioned-Three-Months-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Interest on Pre-Deposit not available If Refund of Pre-Deposit sanctioned within Three Months: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CBIC Circular clarifying Pre-SCN Consultation Norms on Service Tax has no Retrospective Effect: Gauhati HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CBIC-Pre-SCN-Service-Tax-has-Gauhati-HC-taxscan.jpg "CBIC Circular clarifying Pre-SCN Consultation Norms on Service Tax has no Retrospective Effect: Gauhati HC [Read Order]")
![NCLAT sets aside Order Admitting Application filed under Section 7 without fulfilling the Threshold of 1 cr [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NCLAT-Order-Application-taxscan.jpg "NCLAT sets aside Order Admitting Application filed under Section 7 without fulfilling the Threshold of 1 cr [Read Order]")
Customer Care Service is classifiable under 'Business Auxiliary Services' u/s 65 (11) of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that customer care service is classifiable under “Business Auxiliary Services” u/s 65(11) of Finance Act...
![Customer Care Service is classifiable under Business Auxiliary Services u/s 65 (11) of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Customer-care-service-Business-Auxiliary-Service-Finance-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Customer Care Service is classifiable under Business Auxiliary Services u/s 65 (11) of Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Salary incrementation is valid by an Employment Agreement or Board Resolution, No claims sustain under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that salary incrementation is valid only by an employment agreement or board resolution, no claims sustained under...
![Salary incrementation is valid by an Employment Agreement or Board Resolution, No claims sustain under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Salary-incrementation-employment-agreement-Board-Resolution-IBC-NCLAT-Taxscan.jpg "Salary incrementation is valid by an Employment Agreement or Board Resolution, No claims sustain under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![CHA not Responsible for Abetment if no Reason to Doubt Malpractice: CESTAT quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/CHA-Abetment-Malpractice-CESTAT-Penalty-Taxscan.jpeg "CHA not Responsible for Abetment if no Reason to Doubt Malpractice: CESTAT quashes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Anti-Dumping Duty paid after Validity of Notification is Refundable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Anti-Dumping-Duty-Validity-of-Notification-Refundable-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Anti-Dumping Duty paid after Validity of Notification is Refundable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Statement u/s 14 of Central Excise Act, 1944 has no Evidentiary Value without Cross Examination: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the statement made under section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 becomes admissible evidence,...
![Statement u/s 14 of Central Excise Act, 1944 has no Evidentiary Value without Cross Examination: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Statement-Central-Excise-Act-1944-Evidentiary-Value-Cross-Examination-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Statement u/s 14 of Central Excise Act, 1944 has no Evidentiary Value without Cross Examination: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Royalty need not be included in Transaction Value if Not Paid to Foreign Supplier: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Royalty-Transaction-Value-Foreign-Supplier-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Royalty need not be included in Transaction Value if Not Paid to Foreign Supplier: CESTAT [Read Order]")