![Statement u/s 14 of Central Excise Act, 1944 has no Evidentiary Value without Cross Examination: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Statement-Central-Excise-Act-1944-Evidentiary-Value-Cross-Examination-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Statement u/s 14 of Central Excise Act, 1944 has no Evidentiary Value without Cross Examination: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Statement u/s 14 of Central Excise Act, 1944 has no Evidentiary Value without Cross Examination: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the statement made under section 14 of the...
![Royalty need not be included in Transaction Value if Not Paid to Foreign Supplier: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Royalty-Transaction-Value-Foreign-Supplier-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Royalty need not be included in Transaction Value if Not Paid to Foreign Supplier: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Intimation of Notice: Delhi HC quashes Order canceling GST Registration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Intimation-Notice-Delhi-High-Court-GST-Registration-GST-Taxscan.jpg "No Intimation of Notice: Delhi HC quashes Order canceling GST Registration [Read Order]")
![No Demand Sustainable Merely on Shortage and Statements of Persons, who has not Cross-Examined: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Demand-Shortage-Statements-Persons-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "No Demand Sustainable Merely on Shortage and Statements of Persons, who has not Cross-Examined: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Allegation of Non-Re-Warehousing of the Goods Prove by Substantial Evidence but not on Assumption: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Non-Re-Warehousing-of-the-Goods-Substantial-Evidence-Assumption-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Allegation of Non-Re-Warehousing of the Goods Prove by Substantial Evidence but not on Assumption: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Refund of Deposit during Investigation: CESTAT allows Interest @12% from the Date of Deposit [Read Order]
The CESTAT, Kolkata bench, on Monday, allowed interest at 12% from the date of deposit in cases where amount was deposited during the investigation. The Appellant, M/s. Green Valley Industries...
![Refund of Deposit during Investigation: CESTAT allows Interest @12% from the Date of Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Refund-Deposit-Investigation-CESTAT-Interest-Date-of-Deposit-Taxscan.jpg "Refund of Deposit during Investigation: CESTAT allows Interest @12% from the Date of Deposit [Read Order]")
Resolution Professional of its own cannot withhold any plan and refuse to submit same before CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principle bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has held that Resolution Professional of its own cannot withhold any plan and refuse to submit the same before the Committee of...
![Resolution Professional of its own cannot withhold any plan and refuse to submit same before CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Resolution-Professional-cannot-withhold-refuse-submit-CoC-Taxscan.jpg "Resolution Professional of its own cannot withhold any plan and refuse to submit same before CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![IBBI notifies Voluntary Liquidation Process Amendment Regulations, 2022 [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/IBBI-Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Board-of-India-Voluntary-Liquidation-Process-Amendment-Regulations-taxscan.jpg "IBBI notifies Voluntary Liquidation Process Amendment Regulations, 2022 [Read Notification]")
CESTAT slams CGST Commissioner for not complying Tribunal Order, directs to Show Cause as to Why Proceedings for Contempt of Court should not be drawn against him [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of New Delhi Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has slammed CGST Commissioner for not complying with Tribunal Order, directs to Show Cause as to why...
![CESTAT slams CGST Commissioner for not complying Tribunal Order, directs to Show Cause as to Why Proceedings for Contempt of Court should not be drawn against him [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/CESTAT-CGST-Commissioner-Tribunal-Order-Show-Cause-Court-taxscan.jpeg "CESTAT slams CGST Commissioner for not complying Tribunal Order, directs to Show Cause as to Why Proceedings for Contempt of Court should not be drawn against him [Read Order]")
![State Authorities and Tax Departments cannot challenge Resolution Plan: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/State-Authorities-Tax-Depts-Resolution-Plan-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "State Authorities and Tax Departments cannot challenge Resolution Plan: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Assesse is entitled for an Interest of 12% on Pre-Deposit Amount u/s 35F: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Assesse-Interest-Pre-Deposit-Amount-CESTAT-Section-35F-Taxscan.jpeg "Assesse is entitled for an Interest of 12% on Pre-Deposit Amount u/s 35F: CESTAT [Read Order]")
PF Dues are Not the Assets of the Corporate Debtor: NCLAT Directs to Release Full Provident Fund to Ex-Employees [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) has held that PF dues are not the assets of the Corporate Debtor and directs to release the full provident fund to ex-employees. The...
![PF Dues are Not the Assets of the Corporate Debtor: NCLAT Directs to Release Full Provident Fund to Ex-Employees [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/PF-Dues-PF-Assets-dues-Corporate-Debtor-NCLAT-Full-Provident-Fund-Ex-Employees-Taxscan.jpg "PF Dues are Not the Assets of the Corporate Debtor: NCLAT Directs to Release Full Provident Fund to Ex-Employees [Read Order]")