![GST Demand raises for ITC availment of Rs. 4 crores on Ground that Suppliers GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively: Delhi HC directs for Fresh Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/WhatsApp-Image-2025-05-03-at-9.44.14-AM.jpeg "GST Demand raises for ITC availment of Rs. 4 crores on Ground that Suppliers GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively: Delhi HC directs for Fresh Hearing [Read Order]")
GST Demand raises for ITC availment of Rs. 4 crores on Ground that Supplier's GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively: Delhi HC directs for Fresh Hearing [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has set aside a ₹4.34 crore GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand order under Section 73 of the GST Act...
![Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Denovo-adjudication-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Inordinate 11-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates S. 11A(11) of Central Excise Act: Delhi HC Orders Release of Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Central-Excise-Act-Delhi-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Inordinate 11-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates S. 11A(11) of Central Excise Act: Delhi HC Orders Release of Goods [Read Order]")
![Non-Maintenance of Registered Office: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs on Company and Directors [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/MCA-imposes-Penalty-Company-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Maintenance of Registered Office: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs on Company and Directors [Read Notification]")
![Non-Filing of Annual Returns for 2 Consecutive Years: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and its Directors [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Annual-Returns-Non-Filing-MCA-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Filing of Annual Returns for 2 Consecutive Years: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and its Directors [Read Order]")
Taxpayer fails to Opt for Email Notice in Form-35: ITAT Restores Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Raipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the ex-parte order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and restored the matter for fresh adjudication,...
![Taxpayer fails to Opt for Email Notice in Form-35: ITAT Restores Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Form-35-notice.jpg "Taxpayer fails to Opt for Email Notice in Form-35: ITAT Restores Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Kerala GST Dept. Introduces Video Conferencing for Faster Hearings [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Kerala-GST-Deptment-Kerala-GST-Kerala-GST-Dept.-Introduces-Video-Conferencing-Video-Conferencing-for-Faster-Hearings-Video-Conferencing-Faster-Hearings-taxscan.jpg "Kerala GST Dept. Introduces Video Conferencing for Faster Hearings [Read Circular]")
![Failure to Prove Loan Credibility: ITAT Remands Case to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Loan-Adjudication-Taxscan.jpg "Failure to Prove Loan Credibility: ITAT Remands Case to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Pending Proceedings on and before 16th Sep 2024 to Continue Under Old Rules: MCA amends Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules [Read Notification]
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has amended the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 through notification no. G.S.R. 630(E) dated 9th October 2024. The notification states that the...
Income Tax Notices Sent via Email against Assessee's Request: ITAT Sets aside CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Order [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad “B” bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in a recent case set aside an ex parte order passed against the appellant, noting that the notices were sent to the appellant through...
![Income Tax Notices Sent via Email against Assessees Request: ITAT Sets aside CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Notices-Ex-Parte-Order-Taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Notices Sent via Email against Assessees Request: ITAT Sets aside CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Order [Read Order]")
No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the impugned order and the appellants’ Customs Broker license was restored. In this...
![No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CBLR-regulations-CBLR-Taxscan.jpg "No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]")