![Violation of GST S. 75(4), Reply Filed not Considered: Calcutta HC sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/500x300_2070249-gst-violation-taxscan.webp "Violation of GST S. 75(4), Reply Filed not Considered: Calcutta HC sets aside Order [Read Order]")
Violation of GST S. 75(4), Reply Filed not Considered: Calcutta HC sets aside Order [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST order passed by the proper officer under Section 73 of the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) Act 2017 for the ...
![Merely Quoting Section and Alleging Fraud, Wilful Misstatement or Suppression of Facts in SCN not Enough to Cancel GST Registration: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/250x150_2064308-scn-gst-taxscan.webp "Merely Quoting Section and Alleging Fraud, Wilful Misstatement or Suppression of Facts in SCN not Enough to Cancel GST Registration: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Two Income Tax Notice issued by CIT(A) in one Week amounts to Gross Violation of Opportunity to respond: ITAT Allows appeal of Geovista Technology LTD [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/25/250x150_2054151-geovista.webp "Two Income Tax Notice issued by CIT(A) in one Week amounts to Gross Violation of Opportunity to respond: ITAT Allows appeal of Geovista Technology LTD [Read Order]")
![SCN Demanded IGST, But Final Order Imposes CGST & SGST with Penalty: Allahabad HC Finds Order wholly Contrary to Original SCN [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/250x150_2053207-scn-scn-demanded-igst-final-order-imposes-cgst-sgst-cgst-sgst-cgst-sgst-with-penalty-taxscan.webp "SCN Demanded IGST, But Final Order Imposes CGST & SGST with Penalty: Allahabad HC Finds Order wholly Contrary to Original SCN [Read Order]")
![CA and Trader Faces GST SCN for Alleged Ties with Fake Firms: Delhi HC Refuses Stay Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GST-SC-1.jpg "CA and Trader Faces GST SCN for Alleged Ties with Fake Firms: Delhi HC Refuses Stay Adjudication [Read Order]")
GST Demand raises for ITC availment of Rs. 4 crores on Ground that Supplier's GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively: Delhi HC directs for Fresh Hearing [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has set aside a ₹4.34 crore GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand order under Section 73 of the GST Act raised against a proprietor for availment of the Input...
![GST Demand raises for ITC availment of Rs. 4 crores on Ground that Suppliers GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively: Delhi HC directs for Fresh Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/WhatsApp-Image-2025-05-03-at-9.44.14-AM.jpeg "GST Demand raises for ITC availment of Rs. 4 crores on Ground that Suppliers GST Registration Cancelled Retrospectively: Delhi HC directs for Fresh Hearing [Read Order]")
![Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Denovo-adjudication-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]")
Inordinate 11-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates S. 11A(11) of Central Excise Act: Delhi HC Orders Release of Goods [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court quashed orders of confiscation and penalty issued under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, due to an inordinate delay of over 11 years in completing...
![Inordinate 11-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates S. 11A(11) of Central Excise Act: Delhi HC Orders Release of Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Central-Excise-Act-Delhi-HC-taxscan.jpeg "Inordinate 11-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates S. 11A(11) of Central Excise Act: Delhi HC Orders Release of Goods [Read Order]")
Non-Maintenance of Registered Office: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs on Company and Directors [Read Notification]
In the adjudication passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, a penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs was imposed on a company and its 3...
![Non-Maintenance of Registered Office: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs on Company and Directors [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/MCA-imposes-Penalty-Company-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Maintenance of Registered Office: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs on Company and Directors [Read Notification]")
Non-Filing of Annual Returns for 2 Consecutive Years: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and its Directors [Read Order]
The order of adjudication passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies, under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, has imposed a penalty of around 5.2 lakhs on both the...
![Non-Filing of Annual Returns for 2 Consecutive Years: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and its Directors [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Annual-Returns-Non-Filing-MCA-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Filing of Annual Returns for 2 Consecutive Years: MCA Imposes Penalty on Company and its Directors [Read Order]")
Taxpayer fails to Opt for Email Notice in Form-35: ITAT Restores Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Raipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the ex-parte order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and restored the matter for fresh adjudication,...
![Taxpayer fails to Opt for Email Notice in Form-35: ITAT Restores Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Form-35-notice.jpg "Taxpayer fails to Opt for Email Notice in Form-35: ITAT Restores Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")