Kerala GST Dept. issues Instruction on Waiver of Interest/Penalty under GST Amnesty Scheme Â
Through Instruction No. 06/2025 – Kerala SGST, the Kerala GST Department has released guidelines for the Amnesty Scheme's implementation under...
![Kerala GST Dept. Introduces Video Conferencing for Faster Hearings [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Kerala-GST-Deptment-Kerala-GST-Kerala-GST-Dept.-Introduces-Video-Conferencing-Video-Conferencing-for-Faster-Hearings-Video-Conferencing-Faster-Hearings-taxscan.jpg "Kerala GST Dept. Introduces Video Conferencing for Faster Hearings [Read Circular]")
![Failure to Prove Loan Credibility: ITAT Remands Case to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Loan-Adjudication-Taxscan.jpg "Failure to Prove Loan Credibility: ITAT Remands Case to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Notices Sent via Email against Assessees Request: ITAT Sets aside CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Notices-Ex-Parte-Order-Taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Notices Sent via Email against Assessees Request: ITAT Sets aside CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Order [Read Order]")
No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the impugned order and the appellants’ Customs Broker license was restored. In this...
![No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CBLR-regulations-CBLR-Taxscan.jpg "No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]")
CIT(E)'s Fails to Serve Email Notices due to Technical Glitch: ITAT Condones Delay, remands Rejection of Registration u/s 80G(5) Matter [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) condoned a 129-day delay in filing the appeal due to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) CIT(E) failure to serve email...
![CIT(E)s Fails to Serve Email Notices due to Technical Glitch: ITAT Condones Delay, remands Rejection of Registration u/s 80G(5) Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-Ahmedabad-ITAT-Income-Tax-Notice-Email-CITE-Taxscan.jpg "CIT(E)s Fails to Serve Email Notices due to Technical Glitch: ITAT Condones Delay, remands Rejection of Registration u/s 80G(5) Matter [Read Order]")
Extended Gap due to Covid 19 Pandemic led to Inability to Track Hearing Notice: ITAT remands case to CIT (A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded the case to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) (CIT (A) for fresh adjudication, noting that the...
![Extended Gap due to Covid 19 Pandemic led to Inability to Track Hearing Notice: ITAT remands case to CIT (A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CIT-A-Covid-19-Covid-19-Pandemic-Extended-Gap-Extended-Gap-Due-to-Covid-19-TAXSCAN.jpg "Extended Gap due to Covid 19 Pandemic led to Inability to Track Hearing Notice: ITAT remands case to CIT (A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Proper Adjudication and Verification Needed for Addition of Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act:ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) for proper verification and adjudication under Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961 after...
![Proper Adjudication and Verification Needed for Addition of Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act:ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Adjudication-Verification-Cash-Credit-Unexplained-Cash-Credit-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Proper Adjudication and Verification Needed for Addition of Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68 of Income Tax Act:ITAT [Read Order]")
Re-Opening of Assessment by AO u/s 147 of Income Tax Act is Illegal and unjustified due to Unprocessed Original Return: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) quashed the assessment, holding that the re-opening of the assessment under Section 147 of Income Tax Act,1961 was illegal.The Tribunal's...
![Re-Opening of Assessment by AO u/s 147 of Income Tax Act is Illegal and unjustified due to Unprocessed Original Return: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Section-147-of-Income-Tax-Act-Re-Opening-of-Assessment-ITAT-Delhi-taxscan.webp "Re-Opening of Assessment by AO u/s 147 of Income Tax Act is Illegal and unjustified due to Unprocessed Original Return: ITAT [Read Order]")
Treatment of S. 153D Income Tax Act as pari-materia to S. 148 mechanism by AO without Approval: ITAT remands 49 Appeals to CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) Cochin Bench recently addressed a significant issue in a batch of 49 appeals involving various entities from the ABC Sales Corporation group for improper...
![Treatment of S. 153D Income Tax Act as pari-materia to S. 148 mechanism by AO without Approval: ITAT remands 49 Appeals to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Cochin-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-remand-ITAT-remands-49-Appeals-CITA-Section-153D-AO-TAXSCAN.webp "Treatment of S. 153D Income Tax Act as pari-materia to S. 148 mechanism by AO without Approval: ITAT remands 49 Appeals to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Consolidated Penalty u/s 271D and 271E of Income Tax Act not leviable without Specifying Individual Cash Transactions: ITAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Cochin Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the consolidated penalty under section 271D and 271E of Income Tax Act (ITA) cannot be levied without specifying...
![Consolidated Penalty u/s 271D and 271E of Income Tax Act not leviable without Specifying Individual Cash Transactions: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-Cochin-ITAT-Income-Tax-individual-cash-transactions-Cash-Transactions-Penalty-Consolidated-Penalty-taxscan.webp "Consolidated Penalty u/s 271D and 271E of Income Tax Act not leviable without Specifying Individual Cash Transactions: ITAT [Read Order]")