Penalty u/s 45 of Gujarat Sales Tax Act is statutory and Mandatory, Commissioner/AO has no Discretionary Powers: Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court in its recent judgement has held that the Commissioner or Assessing Officer has no discretionary powers on levying of penalty and...
![Litigation Expenses incurred by Assesee Company for Recovery of Money from Debtors cannot be Disallowed: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ITAT-Mumbai-Litigation-Expenses-CITA-Assessee-Section-40aia-Income-Tax-Act-taxsan.jpg "Litigation Expenses incurred by Assesee Company for Recovery of Money from Debtors cannot be Disallowed: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Assesse cannot Claim Cost of Improvement and Indexation Cost unless provides Evidence to Prove Construction: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Assesse-Improvement-Indexation-Cost-Evidence-Prove-Construction-Construction-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Assesse cannot Claim Cost of Improvement and Indexation Cost unless provides Evidence to Prove Construction: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Mere filing of Affidavit is not sufficient to prove the Capacity and Source of Persons who gave Money to Assessee: ITAT grants Rs.10 lakh Relief [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Mere-filing-of-Affidavit-sufficient-Capacity-and-Source-Capacity-Assessee-Money-to-Assessee-Money-ITAT-Relief-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Mere filing of Affidavit is not sufficient to prove the Capacity and Source of Persons who gave Money to Assessee: ITAT grants Rs.10 lakh Relief [Read Order]")
Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]
The Supreme Court (SC) has held that rejecting the value at which goods were sold by treating assessee as related person under section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in absence of proper...
![Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Goods-Sold-Assessee-Related-Person-Excise-Act-Test-is-Erroneous-SC-Supreme-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]")
AO Bound to give Explanation for Not Accepting Submissions of Assessee through a Speaking Order u/s 69 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that assessing officers are bound to give explanation for not accepting submissions of assessee through a speaking order under...
![AO Bound to give Explanation for Not Accepting Submissions of Assessee through a Speaking Order u/s 69 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AO-Explanation-Assessee-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "AO Bound to give Explanation for Not Accepting Submissions of Assessee through a Speaking Order u/s 69 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), comprising PV Subba Rao, Technical Member and Dr Rachna Gupta, Judicial Member observed that procedural...
![Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Procedural-Irregularities-Apparent-Loss-Revenue-Apparent-Loss-to-Revenue-Apparent-Benefit-Benefit-Assessee-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan-.jpg "Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court (HC)held that the order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax Act, 1961 by Assessing Officer (AO) based on a wrong assumption is not valid when the assessee preferred for appeal. ...
![Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Assumption-AO-Order-Income-Tax-assessee-appeal-Orissa-High-Court-Assessing-Officer-Taxscan.jpg "Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
Order for Cancellation of GST Registration without Determining Amount Payable by Assessee Not Valid: Gujarat HC [Read Order]
The Gujarat High Court ( HC ) held that the order for cancellation of GST registration without determining the amount payable by the assessee is not valid. Devi Products, the petitioner challenged...
![Order for Cancellation of GST Registration without Determining Amount Payable by Assessee Not Valid: Gujarat HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Order-for-Cancellation-of-GST-Registration-Cancellation-of-GST-Registration-GST-Registration-Amount-Payable-Assessee-Gujarat-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Order for Cancellation of GST Registration without Determining Amount Payable by Assessee Not Valid: Gujarat HC [Read Order]")
CST: C Forms cannot be Cancelled with Retrospective Effect to Deny Benefit to Assessee, says Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court (HC) held that C Forms cannot be cancelled with its retrospective effect to deny the benefit to the assessee. Zapsell Retail, the petitioner is...
![CST: C Forms cannot be Cancelled with Retrospective Effect to Deny Benefit to Assessee, says Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CST-C-Forms-Retrospective-Effect-Benefit-Benefit-to-Assessee-Delhi-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "CST: C Forms cannot be Cancelled with Retrospective Effect to Deny Benefit to Assessee, says Delhi HC [Read Order]")
No “Purchase” If Sale Deed Executed in favor of Assessee to Claim Capital Gain exemption u/s 54/54F: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that no purchase can be said to be made, if sale deed is executed in favor of the assessee to...
![No “Purchase” If Sale Deed Executed in favor of Assessee to Claim Capital Gain exemption u/s 54/54F: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Capital-Gain-exemption-ITAT-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Assessee-Purchase-Sale-Deed-taxscan.jpg "No “Purchase” If Sale Deed Executed in favor of Assessee to Claim Capital Gain exemption u/s 54/54F: ITAT [Read Order]")