![Death of Assessee shall not abate Income Tax Appellate Proceedings as per Rule 26:ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ITAT-Ahmedabad-Assessee-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Death of Assessee shall not abate Income Tax Appellate Proceedings as per Rule 26:ITAT [Read Order]")
Death of Assessee shall not abate Income Tax Appellate Proceedings as per Rule 26:ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that death of assessee shall not abate assessment proceedings as per...
![Recovery of SAD Refund is not valid when Assessee compiled with all conditions under Refund Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CESTAT-Ahmedabad-SAD-Assessee-Refund-Recovery-taxscan.jpg "Recovery of SAD Refund is not valid when Assessee compiled with all conditions under Refund Notification: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Courts shall not go strictly by the Rulebook to deny Justice to Deserving Litigant as it would lead to Miscarriage of Justice: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ITAT-Supreme-Court-CITA-Courts-taxscan.jpg "Courts shall not go strictly by the Rulebook to deny Justice to Deserving Litigant as it would lead to Miscarriage of Justice: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Litigation Expenses incurred by Assesee Company for Recovery of Money from Debtors cannot be Disallowed: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ITAT-Mumbai-Litigation-Expenses-CITA-Assessee-Section-40aia-Income-Tax-Act-taxsan.jpg "Litigation Expenses incurred by Assesee Company for Recovery of Money from Debtors cannot be Disallowed: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assesse cannot Claim Cost of Improvement and Indexation Cost unless provides Evidence to Prove Construction: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that assessees could not claim cost of improvement and indexation cost unless they provide evidence to prove...
![Assesse cannot Claim Cost of Improvement and Indexation Cost unless provides Evidence to Prove Construction: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Assesse-Improvement-Indexation-Cost-Evidence-Prove-Construction-Construction-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Assesse cannot Claim Cost of Improvement and Indexation Cost unless provides Evidence to Prove Construction: ITAT [Read Order]")
Mere filing of Affidavit is not sufficient to prove the Capacity and Source of Persons who gave Money to Assessee: ITAT grants Rs.10 lakh Relief [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) while granting Rupees 10 lakh relief to assessee held that merely filing of the affidavit is not sufficient to prove...
![Mere filing of Affidavit is not sufficient to prove the Capacity and Source of Persons who gave Money to Assessee: ITAT grants Rs.10 lakh Relief [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Mere-filing-of-Affidavit-sufficient-Capacity-and-Source-Capacity-Assessee-Money-to-Assessee-Money-ITAT-Relief-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Mere filing of Affidavit is not sufficient to prove the Capacity and Source of Persons who gave Money to Assessee: ITAT grants Rs.10 lakh Relief [Read Order]")
Punjab & Haryana HC sets aside Order passed without giving Opportunity to Assessee to Produce the Relevant Documents for Service Tax Exemption
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside the order passed without allowing the assessee to produce the relevant documents for service tax exemption. The Assessing Authority has made a demand...
Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]
The Supreme Court (SC) has held that rejecting the value at which goods were sold by treating assessee as related person under section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in absence of proper...
![Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Goods-Sold-Assessee-Related-Person-Excise-Act-Test-is-Erroneous-SC-Supreme-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Rejecting value at which Goods were Sold by Treating Assessee as Related Person u/s 4(4)(c) of Excise Act in absence of proper Test is Erroneous: SC [Read Order]")
AO Bound to give Explanation for Not Accepting Submissions of Assessee through a Speaking Order u/s 69 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that assessing officers are bound to give explanation for not accepting submissions of assessee through a speaking order under...
![AO Bound to give Explanation for Not Accepting Submissions of Assessee through a Speaking Order u/s 69 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AO-Explanation-Assessee-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "AO Bound to give Explanation for Not Accepting Submissions of Assessee through a Speaking Order u/s 69 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), comprising PV Subba Rao, Technical Member and Dr Rachna Gupta, Judicial Member observed that procedural...
![Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Procedural-Irregularities-Apparent-Loss-Revenue-Apparent-Loss-to-Revenue-Apparent-Benefit-Benefit-Assessee-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan-.jpg "Procedural Irregularities can be Ignored when there is no Apparent Loss to Revenue nor any Apparent Benefit to Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court (HC)held that the order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax Act, 1961 by Assessing Officer (AO) based on a wrong assumption is not valid when the assessee preferred for appeal. ...
![Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Assumption-AO-Order-Income-Tax-assessee-appeal-Orissa-High-Court-Assessing-Officer-Taxscan.jpg "Wrong Assumption by AO, Order u/s 270 passed under Income Tax not valid when Assessee Preferred for Appeal: Orissa HC [Read Order]")