HC does not Exercise Parallel Jurisdiction of CIT to entertain Stay Application: Kerala HC dismisses Writ Petition challenging Stay of Income Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court dismissed writ petition challenging stay of income tax demand and observed that the High Court does not exercise parallel...
![Exemption u/s 54EC shall not be allowed when Investment has not been made during Period of limitation provided u/s 54EC: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ITAT-Investment-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Exemption u/s 54EC shall not be allowed when Investment has not been made during Period of limitation provided u/s 54EC: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Ex-Parte order passed for Non-Appearance of Assessee: ITAT grants another opportunity giving relief to Oriental Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Oriental-Bank-site-img.jpg "Ex-Parte order passed for Non-Appearance of Assessee: ITAT grants another opportunity giving relief to Oriental Bank [Read Order]")
![No Notice issued u/s 143(2) of Income Tax Act by department before framing assessment order: Delhi HC dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/assessment-order-Delhi-HC-Commissioner-Of-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "No Notice issued u/s 143(2) of Income Tax Act by department before framing assessment order: Delhi HC dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on ‘Management, Maintenance and Repair Services’ on ground of Limitation [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the service tax demand on management, maintenance, and repair services on the grounds of...
![CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on ‘Management, Maintenance and Repair Services’ on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Maintenance-and-Repair-Services-repair-services-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on ‘Management, Maintenance and Repair Services’ on ground of Limitation [Read Order]")
CENVAT credit of Excise Duty allowable to Warranty and AMC services provided by a common service provider as common input services for both manufacturing unit and corporate office: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the warranty and Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC) service provided by a common service provider as...
![CENVAT credit of Excise Duty allowable to Warranty and AMC services provided by a common service provider as common input services for both manufacturing unit and corporate office: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CENVAT-credit-Excise-Duty-Allowable-to-Warranty-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "CENVAT credit of Excise Duty allowable to Warranty and AMC services provided by a common service provider as common input services for both manufacturing unit and corporate office: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Appeal can be Abated as per Rule 22 of CESTAT Procedure Rules w.e.f date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that as per Rule 22 of the CESTAT procedure rules,1982 any appeal can be abated with effect from the date...
![Appeal can be Abated as per Rule 22 of CESTAT Procedure Rules w.e.f date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Appeal-resolution-plan-by-NCLT-Appeal-can-be-Abated-as-per-Rule-22-Bangalore-bench-taxscan.jpg "Appeal can be Abated as per Rule 22 of CESTAT Procedure Rules w.e.f date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Failure to clarify ground on which penalty levied: Delhi HC dismisses Departmental appeal without question of law [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi High Court quashed an appeal filed for the levy of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to a failure to clarify the ground on which the...
Kerala HC directs Kerala Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal to decide Extension of Interim Order within 3 Weeks [Read Order]
A Single Bench of Kerala High Court has directed the Kerala Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal to decide extension of interim order within 3 weeks. The petitioner, K.T. Manojkumar was an assessee...
Service order by Affixing on factory gate as first option is Illegal as per Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the service of the order by pasting on the factory gate as the first option is not proper and...
![Service order by Affixing on factory gate as first option is Illegal as per Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Central-Excise-Act-Ahmedabad-bench-Affixing-on-factory-gate-taxscan.jpg "Service order by Affixing on factory gate as first option is Illegal as per Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")