Punjab And Haryana HC imposes Rs. 10K Costs on Income Tax Dept on failure to serve Notice u/s 148A(b) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Punjab and Haryana High Court imposed Rs. 10,000 costs on income tax dept on failure to serve notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act,...
![CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on ‘Management, Maintenance and Repair Services’ on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Maintenance-and-Repair-Services-repair-services-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on ‘Management, Maintenance and Repair Services’ on ground of Limitation [Read Order]")
![CENVAT credit of Excise Duty allowable to Warranty and AMC services provided by a common service provider as common input services for both manufacturing unit and corporate office: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CENVAT-credit-Excise-Duty-Allowable-to-Warranty-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "CENVAT credit of Excise Duty allowable to Warranty and AMC services provided by a common service provider as common input services for both manufacturing unit and corporate office: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Appeal can be Abated as per Rule 22 of CESTAT Procedure Rules w.e.f date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Appeal-resolution-plan-by-NCLT-Appeal-can-be-Abated-as-per-Rule-22-Bangalore-bench-taxscan.jpg "Appeal can be Abated as per Rule 22 of CESTAT Procedure Rules w.e.f date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Kerala HC directs Kerala Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal to decide Extension of Interim Order within 3 Weeks [Read Order]
A Single Bench of Kerala High Court has directed the Kerala Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal to decide extension of interim order within 3 weeks. The petitioner, K.T. Manojkumar was an assessee...
Service order by Affixing on factory gate as first option is Illegal as per Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the service of the order by pasting on the factory gate as the first option is not proper and...
![Service order by Affixing on factory gate as first option is Illegal as per Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Central-Excise-Act-Ahmedabad-bench-Affixing-on-factory-gate-taxscan.jpg "Service order by Affixing on factory gate as first option is Illegal as per Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the granting of a refund claim of Rs. 1.42 crores against the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB)...
![Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/KSEB-Service-Tax-Liability-Bangalore-bench-Refund-Claim-taxscan.jpg "Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]")
CA Incorrectly Interpreted Medical Store at hospital run by assessee-trust as “Business” while filing Form 10AB: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad bench, while directing readjudication, observed that the chartered accountant of the assessee trust incorrectly interpreted the medical store at...
![CA Incorrectly Interpreted Medical Store at hospital run by assessee-trust as “Business” while filing Form 10AB: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ITAT-directs-Readjudication-Ahmedabad-bench-Readjudication-taxscan.jpg "CA Incorrectly Interpreted Medical Store at hospital run by assessee-trust as “Business” while filing Form 10AB: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
CESTAT Set Asides Service Tax Demand on water front royalty charges considered as “port service” on ground of Limitation [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the service tax demand on waterfront royalty charges by considering it included in the ‘Port...
![CESTAT Set Asides Service Tax Demand on water front royalty charges considered as “port service” on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Set-Asides-Service-Tax-water-front-royalty-charges-CESTAT-quashed-the-service-tax-Customs-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Set Asides Service Tax Demand on water front royalty charges considered as “port service” on ground of Limitation [Read Order]")
Water front royalty charge does not Include any Service in relation to Vessel or Goods and does not Falls under ‘Port Service’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the water front royalty charge does not include any services concerning vessels or goods and does not...
![Water front royalty charge does not Include any Service in relation to Vessel or Goods and does not Falls under ‘Port Service’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Port-Service-CESTAT-Quashes-Service-Tax-Demand-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Water front royalty charge does not Include any Service in relation to Vessel or Goods and does not Falls under ‘Port Service’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")