![Appeal can be Abated as per Rule 22 of CESTAT Procedure Rules w.e.f date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Appeal-resolution-plan-by-NCLT-Appeal-can-be-Abated-as-per-Rule-22-Bangalore-bench-taxscan.jpg "Appeal can be Abated as per Rule 22 of CESTAT Procedure Rules w.e.f date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Appeal can be Abated as per Rule 22 of CESTAT Procedure Rules w.e.f date of approval of resolution plan by NCLT: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that as per Rule 22 of the CESTAT procedure rules,1982...
![Service order by Affixing on factory gate as first option is Illegal as per Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Central-Excise-Act-Ahmedabad-bench-Affixing-on-factory-gate-taxscan.jpg "Service order by Affixing on factory gate as first option is Illegal as per Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the granting of a refund claim of Rs. 1.42 crores against the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB)...
![Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/KSEB-Service-Tax-Liability-Bangalore-bench-Refund-Claim-taxscan.jpg "Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]")
CA Incorrectly Interpreted Medical Store at hospital run by assessee-trust as “Business” while filing Form 10AB: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad bench, while directing readjudication, observed that the chartered accountant of the assessee trust incorrectly interpreted the medical store at...
![CA Incorrectly Interpreted Medical Store at hospital run by assessee-trust as “Business” while filing Form 10AB: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ITAT-directs-Readjudication-Ahmedabad-bench-Readjudication-taxscan.jpg "CA Incorrectly Interpreted Medical Store at hospital run by assessee-trust as “Business” while filing Form 10AB: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
CESTAT Set Asides Service Tax Demand on water front royalty charges considered as “port service” on ground of Limitation [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the service tax demand on waterfront royalty charges by considering it included in the ‘Port...
![CESTAT Set Asides Service Tax Demand on water front royalty charges considered as “port service” on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Set-Asides-Service-Tax-water-front-royalty-charges-CESTAT-quashed-the-service-tax-Customs-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Set Asides Service Tax Demand on water front royalty charges considered as “port service” on ground of Limitation [Read Order]")
Water front royalty charge does not Include any Service in relation to Vessel or Goods and does not Falls under ‘Port Service’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the water front royalty charge does not include any services concerning vessels or goods and does not...
![Water front royalty charge does not Include any Service in relation to Vessel or Goods and does not Falls under ‘Port Service’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Port-Service-CESTAT-Quashes-Service-Tax-Demand-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Water front royalty charge does not Include any Service in relation to Vessel or Goods and does not Falls under ‘Port Service’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Rejection of Excise Appeal on ground of Violation of Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the rejection of the excise appeal on the grounds of violation of section 37 C (1) of the Central Excise...
![CESTAT Quashes Rejection of Excise Appeal on ground of Violation of Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-Service-order-Ahmedabad-bench-Rejection-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Rejection of Excise Appeal on ground of Violation of Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act [Read Order]")
No Service Tax Liability Demandable on Water front Royalty charge recovered from licensee are in nature of statutory levy which credited to consolidated fund of State of Gujarat: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the service tax liability cannot be demanded on the waterfront royalty charge recovered from the...
![No Service Tax Liability Demandable on Water front Royalty charge recovered from licensee are in nature of statutory levy which credited to consolidated fund of State of Gujarat: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Service-Tax-Liability-Royalty-charge-recovered-from-licensee-consolidated-fund-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Service Tax Liability Demandable on Water front Royalty charge recovered from licensee are in nature of statutory levy which credited to consolidated fund of State of Gujarat: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Claim of setoff of Unabsorbed Depreciation carried forward from earlier year against Income from Capital Gains shall be permitted: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the claim of setoff of unabsorbed depreciation carried forward from earlier years against income from capital gains shall be...
![Claim of setoff of Unabsorbed Depreciation carried forward from earlier year against Income from Capital Gains shall be permitted: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Depreciation-income-tax-news-Capital-Gains-shall-be-permitted-TAXSCAN.jpg "Claim of setoff of Unabsorbed Depreciation carried forward from earlier year against Income from Capital Gains shall be permitted: ITAT [Read Order]")