![Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/KSEB-Service-Tax-Liability-Bangalore-bench-Refund-Claim-taxscan.jpg "Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]")
Set Back to KSEB: CESTAT Quashes Granting of Refund Claim of Rs 1.42 crores under ‘Consulting Engineer Service’ on ground of Service Tax Liability [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the granting of a refund claim of Rs. 1.42 crores...
![CA Incorrectly Interpreted Medical Store at hospital run by assessee-trust as “Business” while filing Form 10AB: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ITAT-directs-Readjudication-Ahmedabad-bench-Readjudication-taxscan.jpg "CA Incorrectly Interpreted Medical Store at hospital run by assessee-trust as “Business” while filing Form 10AB: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Set Asides Service Tax Demand on water front royalty charges considered as “port service” on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Set-Asides-Service-Tax-water-front-royalty-charges-CESTAT-quashed-the-service-tax-Customs-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Set Asides Service Tax Demand on water front royalty charges considered as “port service” on ground of Limitation [Read Order]")
![Water front royalty charge does not Include any Service in relation to Vessel or Goods and does not Falls under ‘Port Service’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Port-Service-CESTAT-Quashes-Service-Tax-Demand-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Water front royalty charge does not Include any Service in relation to Vessel or Goods and does not Falls under ‘Port Service’: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Quashes Rejection of Excise Appeal on ground of Violation of Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-Service-order-Ahmedabad-bench-Rejection-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Rejection of Excise Appeal on ground of Violation of Section 37 C (1) of Central Excise Act [Read Order]")
No Service Tax Liability Demandable on Water front Royalty charge recovered from licensee are in nature of statutory levy which credited to consolidated fund of State of Gujarat: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the service tax liability cannot be demanded on the waterfront royalty charge recovered from the...
![No Service Tax Liability Demandable on Water front Royalty charge recovered from licensee are in nature of statutory levy which credited to consolidated fund of State of Gujarat: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Service-Tax-Liability-Royalty-charge-recovered-from-licensee-consolidated-fund-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Service Tax Liability Demandable on Water front Royalty charge recovered from licensee are in nature of statutory levy which credited to consolidated fund of State of Gujarat: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Claim of setoff of Unabsorbed Depreciation carried forward from earlier year against Income from Capital Gains shall be permitted: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the claim of setoff of unabsorbed depreciation carried forward from earlier years against income from capital gains shall be...
![Claim of setoff of Unabsorbed Depreciation carried forward from earlier year against Income from Capital Gains shall be permitted: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Depreciation-income-tax-news-Capital-Gains-shall-be-permitted-TAXSCAN.jpg "Claim of setoff of Unabsorbed Depreciation carried forward from earlier year against Income from Capital Gains shall be permitted: ITAT [Read Order]")
Failure of AO to conduct an Independent Investigation: ITAT deletes Addition u/s 68 made on Presumptions and Conjectures [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 made on presumptions and conjectures and also the failure of the...
![Failure of AO to conduct an Independent Investigation: ITAT deletes Addition u/s 68 made on Presumptions and Conjectures [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Failure-of-AO-ITAT-deletes-Addition-Presumptions-and-Conjectures-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Assessing-Officer-taxscan.jpg "Failure of AO to conduct an Independent Investigation: ITAT deletes Addition u/s 68 made on Presumptions and Conjectures [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on supply of chassis under GTA service on ground of Wrongful Inclusion of Service Category under ‘Supply Tangible Goods Service’ [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the service tax demand on the supply of chassis under the Goods Transport Agent (GTA) service on the...
![CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on supply of chassis under GTA service on ground of Wrongful Inclusion of Service Category under ‘Supply Tangible Goods Service’ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/goods-Transport-Agent-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CESTAT-Transport-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on supply of chassis under GTA service on ground of Wrongful Inclusion of Service Category under ‘Supply Tangible Goods Service’ [Read Order]")
No Service Tax Demandable on Same Transaction both at hands of Service Recipient and Service Provider under different category of services: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that service tax cannot be demanded on the same transaction both at the hands of the service recipient and...
![No Service Tax Demandable on Same Transaction both at hands of Service Recipient and Service Provider under different category of services: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/No-Service-Tax-Demandable-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax Demandable on Same Transaction both at hands of Service Recipient and Service Provider under different category of services: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CENVAT Credit of Excise Duty Allowable on Renting of Immovable Property service of corporate office which is considered as an Input Service: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the CENVAT credit of excise duty is allowable on the renting of immovable property services of...
![CENVAT Credit of Excise Duty Allowable on Renting of Immovable Property service of corporate office which is considered as an Input Service: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Ahmedabad-bench-corporate-office-taxscan.jpg "CENVAT Credit of Excise Duty Allowable on Renting of Immovable Property service of corporate office which is considered as an Input Service: CESTAT [Read Order]")