![ITAT Rules Abandoned IPO Expenses as Revenue in Nature, Deletes Disallowance u/s 37(1) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Rules-ITAT-Rules-Abandoned-IPO-Expenses-IPO-Revenue-in-Nature-Deletes-Disallowance-Disallowance-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Rules Abandoned IPO Expenses as Revenue in Nature, Deletes Disallowance u/s 37(1) [Read Order]")
ITAT Rules Abandoned IPO Expenses as Revenue in Nature, Deletes Disallowance u/s 37(1) [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that expenses incurred on an abandoned Initial Public Offering (IPO) are revenue in...
![Relief to Indian Oil: ITAT Grants Interest on Excess Tax, Allows Delayed Refund Interest from June 2016 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/itat-itat-mumbai-Indian-Oil-ITAT-Grants-Interest-on-Excess-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to Indian Oil: ITAT Grants Interest on Excess Tax, Allows Delayed Refund Interest from June 2016 [Read Order]")
![Service Tax leviable only on ‘Service Component’ under Tyre Retreaders’ Composite Works Contract: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Service-Tax-Service-Component-Tyre-Retreaders-Composite-Works-Contract-Karnataka-HC-taxscan.jpg "Service Tax leviable only on ‘Service Component’ under Tyre Retreaders’ Composite Works Contract: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")
Statutory Functionary Cannot Assume powers not Conferred Upon It: Supreme Court Directs Refund of Unduly Retained Stamp Duty [Read Judgement]
In a notable judgment, the Supreme Court of India directed a real-estate developer to issue refund of an amount of ₹27,00,000 received from a buyer, against the Agreement to sell while observing that...
[Breaking] S. 87A Rebate Update: Bombay HC Rules Rebate Applies to Total Tax, Including Special Rates Unless Explicitly Excluded [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court ruled that the rebate under Section 87A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, applies to the total tax liability of eligible taxpayers, including tax on income...
![[Breaking] S. 87A Rebate Update: Bombay HC Rules Rebate Applies to Total Tax, Including Special Rates Unless Explicitly Excluded [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Rebate-Update-Bombay-HC-Rebate-Applies-Total-Tax-Including-Special-Rates-Unless-Explicitly-Excluded-taxscan.jpg "[Breaking] S. 87A Rebate Update: Bombay HC Rules Rebate Applies to Total Tax, Including Special Rates Unless Explicitly Excluded [Read Order]")
[BREAKING] Bombay HC quashes GST on Leasehold Rights, directs to Consider Gujarat HC decision while Remanding Matter [Read Order]
The issue involved was whether the GST Authorities can levy GST on a Deed of Assignment under which the land and the building constructed thereon is transferred by a Lessee to the 3rd party. ...
![[BREAKING] Bombay HC quashes GST on Leasehold Rights, directs to Consider Gujarat HC decision while Remanding Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Bombay-HC-Bombay-HC-quashes-GST-GST-on-Leasehold-Rights-Leasehold-Rights-Gujarat-HC-Gujarat-HC-decision-Remanding-Matter-taxscan.jpg "[BREAKING] Bombay HC quashes GST on Leasehold Rights, directs to Consider Gujarat HC decision while Remanding Matter [Read Order]")
“Fit Case for Exemplary Costs on Complainant and ED”: Bombay HC in Cooked up Case against Developer [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Bombay High Court, presided over by Justice Milind N. Jadhav quashed criminal proceedings against the developers Rakesh Brijlal Jain and others, initiated under the...
Bankers' Higher Salaries Justify Proportionate Tax Burden, No Arbitrariness: Bombay HC Upholds S. 17(2) Income Tax Amendment [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court stated that requiring higher-paid bank employees to bear a proportionately higher tax burden was justified and not violative of Article 14 of the...
![Bankers Higher Salaries Justify Proportionate Tax Burden, No Arbitrariness: Bombay HC Upholds S. 17(2) Income Tax Amendment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Bombay-HC-Bombay-High-Court-Higher-Salaries-Tax-Burden-Income-Tax-Amendment-taxscan.jpg "Bankers Higher Salaries Justify Proportionate Tax Burden, No Arbitrariness: Bombay HC Upholds S. 17(2) Income Tax Amendment [Read Order]")
![No Retrospective Amendment to Section 14A: ITAT Dismisses Revenues Plea [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Section-14A-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Dismisses-Revenue-Taxscan.jpg "No Retrospective Amendment to Section 14A: ITAT Dismisses Revenues Plea [Read Order]")
SC Orders ₹1,600 Crore Refund to Vodafone Idea, Slams Income Tax Dept for Negligence and Procedural Failures
The Supreme Court on Monday (20.01.2025) upheld a Bombay High Court order directing the Income Tax Department to refund Rs. 1,128 crore to Vodafone Idea Limited along with interest of Rs. 500 crore....
