Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court, Bombay HC, Mumbai High Court, High Court of Bombay
![Sales Tax Tribunal Can Rectify Glaring Errors Ignoring Precedents and Jurisdictional Lapses u/s 62: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/20/2089091-bombay-hc-sales-tax.webp "Sales Tax Tribunal Can Rectify Glaring Errors Ignoring Precedents and Jurisdictional Lapses u/s 62: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Sales Tax Tribunal Can Rectify Glaring Errors Ignoring Precedents and Jurisdictional Lapses u/s 62: Bombay HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court held that the Sales Tax Tribunal has the power to rectify glaring errors under Section 62 of the Bombay...
![Income Tax Penalty Cannot Be Levied on Estimated Additions for Alleged Bogus Purchases: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/20/2089066-income-tax-pently-bogus-purchases-sales-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Penalty Cannot Be Levied on Estimated Additions for Alleged Bogus Purchases: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Win for Parle Products: Bombay HC Rules Freight Charges Reimbursed by Wholesalers Do Not Form Part of Sale Price, No Sales Tax Payable [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/20/2089058-win-for-parle-products-parle-products-taxscan.webp "Win for Parle Products: Bombay HC Rules Freight Charges Reimbursed by Wholesalers Do Not Form Part of Sale Price, No Sales Tax Payable [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC remands Order of ITAT to Decide on Nature of Service of AMC Charges on Medical Equipment X-ray machines and its TDS deduction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/20/2088959-x-ray-machine.webp "Bombay HC remands Order of ITAT to Decide on Nature of Service of AMC Charges on Medical Equipment X-ray machines and its TDS deduction [Read Order]")
![CBIC Notification on GST Amnesty Scheme cannot Prescribe Retrospective Cut-Off Date: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/19/2088737-cbic-cbic-notification-gst-gst-amnesty-scheme-taxscan.webp "CBIC Notification on GST Amnesty Scheme cannot Prescribe Retrospective Cut-Off Date: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Payment to Consultant Doctors not salary in absence of Fixed Pay, TDS Deductible u/s 194J: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has held that payments to consultant doctors are not salary in absence of fixed pay. Hence, TDS ( Tax Deduction at Source ) is deductible under Section 194J of the Income Tax...
![Payment to Consultant Doctors not salary in absence of Fixed Pay, TDS Deductible u/s 194J: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/19/2088596-consultant-doctors-absence-of-fixed-pay-tds-deductible-taxscan.webp "Payment to Consultant Doctors not salary in absence of Fixed Pay, TDS Deductible u/s 194J: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Challenge on Application filed u/s 35-C(2) of the Excise Act: Bombay HC blames for Wasting Judicial time for no valid reason [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Bombay High Court blamed the applicant for wasting judicial time for no valid reason. The issue was whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause to condone delay, in filing...
![Challenge on Application filed u/s 35-C(2) of the Excise Act: Bombay HC blames for Wasting Judicial time for no valid reason [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/18/2088364-bombay-highcourt-taxscan.webp "Challenge on Application filed u/s 35-C(2) of the Excise Act: Bombay HC blames for Wasting Judicial time for no valid reason [Read Order]")
Bogus Royalty Expenses Exceed ₹50 Lakh: Bombay HC upholds Income Tax Reassessment Beyond 3 Years [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court at Goa has clarified that income tax reassessment proceedings initiated beyond three years are valid where the alleged bogus royalty expenses exceed ₹50 lakh. The ...
![Bogus Royalty Expenses Exceed ₹50 Lakh: Bombay HC upholds Income Tax Reassessment Beyond 3 Years [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/17/2088140-bogus-royalty-expenses-bogus-royalty-bombay-hc-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Bogus Royalty Expenses Exceed ₹50 Lakh: Bombay HC upholds Income Tax Reassessment Beyond 3 Years [Read Order]")
SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has ruled that after the omission of the Rules 89(4B) and 96(10) of GST ( Goods and Services tax), the pending proceedings, in the absence of any saving clauses or the benefit...
![SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/2085862-scn-appeals-and-non-finalised-orders-gst-rules-taxscan.webp "SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
GST Liability in Construction JDA Arises Only Upon Transfer of Possession or Rights, Not on Execution of Agreement: Bombay HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court ruled that GST liability in a construction joint development agreement (JDA) arises only upon the conveyance or transfer of possession or rights, and not on...
![GST Liability in Construction JDA Arises Only Upon Transfer of Possession or Rights, Not on Execution of Agreement: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/04/2084070-gst-liability-non-payment-short-payment-tax-on-outward-supplies-madras-hc-reasonable-opportunity-pre-deposit-taxscan.webp "GST Liability in Construction JDA Arises Only Upon Transfer of Possession or Rights, Not on Execution of Agreement: Bombay HC [Read Order]")