![Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Excise-and-Customs-CESTAT-on-Orders-posting-TAXSCAN.jpg "Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Orders-In-Original to be Posted at Conspicuous Part of Factory u/s 37(1) Excise Act before Posting on Dept. Notice Board: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that an Order-in-Original under the Central Excise...
![Provision of S. 11BB of Excise Act not applicable for Claiming Interest on Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Excise-and-Customs-Section-11BB-of-Central-Excise-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Provision of S. 11BB of Excise Act not applicable for Claiming Interest on Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Excise-Demand-Order-Kolkata-Bench-of-CESTAT-cross-examination-opportunity-citing-Excise-Duty-and-imposed-penalties-Customs-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/r 209A of Central Excise Limited to Individuals Dealing with Confiscable Goods, Not Applicable to Partnership Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Confiscable-Goods-Central-Excise-Limited-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/r 209A of Central Excise Limited to Individuals Dealing with Confiscable Goods, Not Applicable to Partnership Firms: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 10]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Annual-Digest-2024-Annual-Digest-2024-Indirect-Tax-Cases-CESTAT-Annual-Digest-Bangalore-bench-of-CESTAT-GTA-services-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Orders-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 10]")
Deposit made 'Under Protest' without SCN cannot be Barred by Unjust Enrichment u/s 11B of Central Excise: CESTAT allows Refund [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that deposits made "under protest" without the issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) cannot be barred by...
Rule 8(3) Ultra Vires to 11AB (1) of Central Excise Act: Punjab & Haryana HC Allows Refund of Excessive Interest [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Punjab And Haryana High Court has held that Rule 8(3) ultra vires to section 11AB(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944 . The court directed the department to refund the amount...
Monetary Threshold Limit not Considered only for Constitutional Validity or Ultra Vires Issues: CESTAT Rules Dept. Appeal Not Maintainable [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) dismissed department’s appeal stating that appeals filed by the revenue department are exempt from the...
![Monetary Threshold Limit not Considered only for Constitutional Validity or Ultra Vires Issues: CESTAT Rules Dept. Appeal Not Maintainable [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Customs-Constitutional-Validity-Monetary-Threshold-Limit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Monetary Threshold Limit not Considered only for Constitutional Validity or Ultra Vires Issues: CESTAT Rules Dept. Appeal Not Maintainable [Read Order]")
No Penalty Applies when wrongful CENVAT Credit Claim Reversed Voluntarily before issuance of SCN: CESTAT reduces Penalty [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Chennai has reduced the penalty imposed on M/s. Natesan Synchrocones Pvt. Ltd. for wrongful availing of Central Value Added Tax (...
![No Penalty Applies when wrongful CENVAT Credit Claim Reversed Voluntarily before issuance of SCN: CESTAT reduces Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chennai-CENVAT-Credit-SCN-Show-Cause-Notice-CESTAT-Reduces-Penalty-on-CENVAT-Claim-Taxscan.jpg "No Penalty Applies when wrongful CENVAT Credit Claim Reversed Voluntarily before issuance of SCN: CESTAT reduces Penalty [Read Order]")
No Provision under Central Excise Act, 1944 & Rules to enable Assessee to Pay Central Excise Duty under protest: CESTATÂ rejects Refund Claim [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that there is no provision under the Central Excise Act, 1944 & Rules made thereunder for the...
![No Provision under Central Excise Act, 1944 & Rules to enable Assessee to Pay Central Excise Duty under protest: CESTATÂ rejects Refund Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CESTAT-Allahabad-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Provision under Central Excise Act, 1944 & Rules to enable Assessee to Pay Central Excise Duty under protest: CESTATÂ rejects Refund Claim [Read Order]")
Pre-GST Dues can be Cleared in Monthly Instalments: Madras HC rules Partly in Favour of Manufacturing Company in Loss [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled in favour of a manufacturing company facing financial difficulties, allowing it to clear its pre-GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) dues of Rs. 1.2 crores through monthly...
![Pre-GST Dues can be Cleared in Monthly Instalments: Madras HC rules Partly in Favour of Manufacturing Company in Loss [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-Pre-GST-Dues-Goods-and-Services-Tax-Monthly-instalments-for-tax-dues-Monthly-Instalments-taxscan.jpg "Pre-GST Dues can be Cleared in Monthly Instalments: Madras HC rules Partly in Favour of Manufacturing Company in Loss [Read Order]")
![Panchnama should Not be treated as Certificate: CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty under Central Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Delhi-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Penalty-Panchnama-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Panchnama should Not be treated as Certificate: CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty under Central Excise Act [Read Order]")