![Relief to Polycab Wires: CESTAT Quashes Demand of service tax on Ocean Freight [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/29/500x300_2081755-polycab-wires.webp "Relief to Polycab Wires: CESTAT Quashes Demand of service tax on Ocean Freight [Read Order]")
Relief to Polycab Wires: CESTAT Quashes Demand of service tax on Ocean Freight [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) Ahmedabad bench in a ruling in favour of Polycab Wires Pvt Ltd, quashed the demand...
![CESTAT Rules Leasing of ISO Tank Containers from Overseas Suppliers as Deemed Sale, Not Taxable Service [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/26/250x150_2080756-cestat-ahmedabad-iso-tank-containers-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules Leasing of ISO Tank Containers from Overseas Suppliers as Deemed Sale, Not Taxable Service [Read Order]")
![Relief to Polycab Wires: CESTAT Quashes Demand of service tax on Ocean Freight [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/24/250x150_2080124-polycab-wires-cestat-service-tax-ocean-freight-taxscan.webp "Relief to Polycab Wires: CESTAT Quashes Demand of service tax on Ocean Freight [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty Demand on Re-Imported Rejected Diesel Generator Sets Citing Lack of Suppression [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/250x150_2070548-cestat-ahmedabad-cestat-quashes-cestat-quashes-customs-duty-demand-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty Demand on Re-Imported Rejected Diesel Generator Sets Citing Lack of Suppression [Read Order]")
![Excess amount of service tax paid cannot be alleged to be with malafied intention in absence of Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/250x150_2070037-cestat-absence-of-evidence-service-tax-taxscan.webp "Excess amount of service tax paid cannot be alleged to be with malafied intention in absence of Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty Demand on Re-Imported Rejected Diesel Generator Sets Citing Lack of Suppression [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that customs duty demands on re-imported rejected DG sets are unsustainable when the extended period is...
![CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty Demand on Re-Imported Rejected Diesel Generator Sets Citing Lack of Suppression [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/500x300_2068605-cestat-customs-duty-demand-re-imported-rejected-diesel-generator-citing-lack-of-suppression-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Quashes Customs Duty Demand on Re-Imported Rejected Diesel Generator Sets Citing Lack of Suppression [Read Order]")
MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and related evidence proved the appellant’s active involvement...
![MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067975-mou-proves-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxscan.webp "MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]")
Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under 'Supply of Tangible Goods Service', not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that providing cash vans with drivers to banks falls under the category of “Supply of Tangible Goods...
![Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under Supply of Tangible Goods Service, not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067978-cash-vans-taxscan.webp "Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under Supply of Tangible Goods Service, not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Allows Refund of Amounts Paid Under Mistake, Even Beyond One-Year Limitation Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067944-refund-amount-allahabad-cestat-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Allows Refund of Amounts Paid Under Mistake, Even Beyond One-Year Limitation Period [Read Order]")
Splitting Invoices for Furniture and Building Rent Should Not Deny Legitimate Refund When Service Tax is Properly Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that splitting invoices between furniture and building rent should not lead to denial of a refund when...
![Splitting Invoices for Furniture and Building Rent Should Not Deny Legitimate Refund When Service Tax is Properly Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/500x300_2065041-splitting-invoices-invoices-splitting-invoices-for-furniture-and-building-rent-furniture-and-building-rent-taxscan.webp "Splitting Invoices for Furniture and Building Rent Should Not Deny Legitimate Refund When Service Tax is Properly Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Exported Goods Misdeclared as “Natural Abrasive Grain” Instead of Restricted “Natural Garnet”: CESTAT upholds DGFT Policy Violation [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Tirupati Enterprises misdeclared restricted goods as general abrasives to circumvent export...
![Exported Goods Misdeclared as “Natural Abrasive Grain” Instead of Restricted “Natural Garnet”: CESTAT upholds DGFT Policy Violation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/500x300_2065021-exported-goods-misdeclared-exported-goods-exported-goods-misdeclared-as-natural-abrasive-grain-taxscan.webp "Exported Goods Misdeclared as “Natural Abrasive Grain” Instead of Restricted “Natural Garnet”: CESTAT upholds DGFT Policy Violation [Read Order]")
Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer (SBC) should be classified under “Polymers of Styrene” and not under...
![Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062847-cestat-polymers-styrene-taxscan.webp "Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]")